IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v64by2009i1p45-54.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Generativity in Later Life: Perceived Respect From Younger Generations as a Determinant of Goal Disengagement and Psychological Well-being

Author

Listed:
  • Sheung-Tak Cheng

Abstract

It was hypothesized that actions to benefit the next generation would not lead to well-being unless they are perceived to be valued and respected and that the lack of perceived respect would further lead to disengagement from generative goals. Older persons responded to measures of generative concern, action, perceived respect, and psychological well-being at 2 time points 12 months apart. Structural equation modeling showed that at both time points, the effect of action on well-being was completely mediated by perceived respect. Moreover, a lack of perceived respect at baseline predicted a decrease in generative concern 12 months later, suggesting that, in later life, continuing concern is partly dependent on the attitudes of younger generations. When their attitudes are unfavorable, a downward spiral in generativity development and well-being is possible. Copyright 2009, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Sheung-Tak Cheng, 2009. "Generativity in Later Life: Perceived Respect From Younger Generations as a Determinant of Goal Disengagement and Psychological Well-being," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 64(1), pages 45-54.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:64b:y:2009:i:1:p:45-54
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbn027
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rodrigo Serrat & Karima Chacur-Kiss & Feliciano Villar, 2023. "Ageing Activisms: A Narrative Exploration of Older Adults’ Experiences of Political Participation," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 28(1), pages 73-92, March.
    2. Haoyi Guo & Steven Sek-yum Ngai, 2021. "Domestic Generative Acts and Life Satisfaction among Supplementary Grandparent Caregivers in Urban China: Mediated by Social Support and Moderated by Hukou Status," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-14, November.
    3. Wang, Kun & Marbut, Alexander R. & Suntai, Zainab & Zheng, Dianhan & Chen, Xiayu, 2022. "Patterns in older adults' perceived chronic stressor types and cognitive functioning trajectories: Are perceived chronic stressors always bad?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    4. Chien-Chung Huang & Yuanfa Tan & Shannon P. Cheung & Hongwei Hu, 2021. "Adverse Childhood Experiences and Psychological Well-Being in Chinese College Students: Mediation Effect of Mindfulness," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-12, February.
    5. J. Tomás & P. Sancho & M. Gutiérrez & L. Galiana, 2014. "Predicting Life Satisfaction in the Oldest-Old: A Moderator Effects Study," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 117(2), pages 601-613, June.
    6. Haoyi Guo & Steven Sek-yum Ngai, 2021. "Validation of the Generative Acts Scale-Chinese Version (GAS-C) among Middle-Aged and Older Adults as Grandparents in Mainland China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-14, September.
    7. Lin, Tian & Harris, Elizabeth A. & Heemskerk, Amber & Van Bavel, Jay J. & Ebner, Natalie C., 2021. "A multi-national test on self-reported compliance with COVID-19 public health measures: The role of individual age and gender demographics and countries’ developmental status," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 286(C).
    8. Yu-Chih Chen & Natalee Hung & Bobo H. P. Lau & Rebecca M. P. Choy Yung & Ellmon S. M. Fung & Cecilia L. W. Chan, 2022. "Generativity and Gendered Pathways to Health: The Role of Human, Social, and Financial Capital Past Mid-Life," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-14, April.
    9. Karl Pillemer & Julia Nolte & Leslie Schultz & Harry Yau & Charles R. Henderson & Marie Tillema Cope & Barbara Baschiera, 2022. "The Benefits of Intergenerational Wisdom-Sharing: A Randomized Controlled Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-15, March.
    10. Alma Au & Simon Lai & Wen Wu & Jan Hofer & Holger Busch & Iva Poláčková Šolcová & Peter Tavel & Sheung-Tak Cheng, 2020. "Generativity and Positive Emotion in Older Adults: Mediation of Achievement and Altruism Goal Attainment Across Three Cultures," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 677-692, February.
    11. Sarvarubini Nainee & Intan Hashimah Mohd Hashim & Masarah Mohamad Yusof, 2023. "Generativity and Subjective Wellbeing of Malaysian Old Adults: The Role of Gender and Living Arrangement," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, October.
    12. Tara L. Gruenewald & Elizabeth K. Tanner & Linda P. Fried & Michelle C. Carlson & Qian-Li Xue & Jeanine M. Parisi & George W. Rebok & Lisa M. Yarnell & Teresa E. Seeman, 2016. "The Baltimore Experience Corps Trial: Enhancing Generativity via Intergenerational Activity Engagement in Later Life," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 71(4), pages 661-670.
    13. Kumiko Nonaka & Hiroshi Murayama & Yoh Murayama & Sachiko Murayama & Masataka Kuraoka & Yuta Nemoto & Erika Kobayashi & Yoshinori Fujiwara, 2023. "The Impact of Generativity on Maintaining Higher-Level Functional Capacity of Older Adults: A Longitudinal Study in Japan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(11), pages 1-10, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:64b:y:2009:i:1:p:45-54. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.