IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/erevae/v26y1999i3p371-88.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implementation of the WTO Agreement on Agriculture and Developments for the Next Round of Negotiations

Author

Listed:
  • Josling, Tim
  • Tangermann, Stefan

Abstract

The Uruguay Round Agreement on Agriculture has fundamentally changed the rules for international agricultural trade, and established quantitative constraints for agricultural policies of all WTO members. Although countries have tried to escape the new disciplines here and there, overall there has been substantial compliance, and implementation of the Agreement has proceeded smoothly. The next round of WTO negotiations on agriculture, to be launched in 1999, will have to clarify and strengthen some of the rules agreed during the Uruguay Round, but should mainly be devoted to negotiating further significant reductions. In addition, other issues that have emerged as contentious in the area of agricultural trade, and that will affect the next Round, will be discussed. Copyright 1999 by Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Josling, Tim & Tangermann, Stefan, 1999. "Implementation of the WTO Agreement on Agriculture and Developments for the Next Round of Negotiations," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 26(3), pages 371-388, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:erevae:v:26:y:1999:i:3:p:371-88
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mittenzwei, Klaus & Britz, Wolfgang & Wieck, Christine, 2014. "Does the “green box” of the European Union distort global markets?," Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA), vol. 3(1), pages 1-20, April.
    2. Carl GAIGNÉ & Cathie LAROCHE DUPRAZ & Alan MATTHEWS, 2015. "Thirty years of European research on international trade in food and agricultural products," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 96(1), pages 91-130.
    3. Vaittinen, Risto, 2003. "Liberalisation of Agricultural Trade - Global Implications and what it Means for the EU," Discussion Papers 303, VATT Institute for Economic Research.
    4. Johan F.M.Swinnen & Alessandro Olper & Thijs Vandemoortele, 2011. "The Political Economy of Policy Instrument Choice: Theory and Evidence from Agricultural Policies," LICOS Discussion Papers 27911, LICOS - Centre for Institutions and Economic Performance, KU Leuven.
    5. Akram A. Khan & Nazli Bano, 2007. "Declining Indian Agricultural Trade in an Unequal World," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 8(1), pages 99-117, February.
    6. Gaeta, Davide & Corsinovi, Paola, 2015. "Traditional Terms and Appellation Wines Debates in Sight of TTIP Negotiation," 145th Seminar, April 14-15, 2015, Parma, Italy 200234, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    7. Blandford, David, 1999. "The Upcoming Round Of Agricultural Trade Negotiations: Possible Us Objectives And Constraints," Agricultural Policy Papers 23682, Massey University, Centre for Applied Economics and Policy Studies.
    8. Bertoni, Danilo & Olper, Alessandro, 2012. "The Political Economy Of Agri-Environmental Measures: An Empirical Assessment At The Eu Regional Level," APSTRACT: Applied Studies in Agribusiness and Commerce, AGRIMBA, vol. 6(3-4), pages 1-12, November.
    9. Halmai, Peter & Elekes, Andrea, 2005. "CAP Reform in the Light of the WTO Doha Round Negotiations," 2005 International Congress, August 23-27, 2005, Copenhagen, Denmark 24693, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    10. Berger, Jurij & Dalheimer, Bernhard & Brümmer, Bernhard, 2021. "Effects of variable EU import levies on corn price volatility," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    11. Roland Herrmann & Marc Kramb & Christina Mönnich, 2001. "Tariff rate quotas and the economic impact of agricultural trade liberalization in the world trade organization," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 7(1), pages 1-19, February.
    12. Bradley J. Rickard & Abigail M. Okrent & Julian M. Alston, 2013. "How Have Agricultural Policies Influenced Caloric Consumption In The United States?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(3), pages 316-339, March.
    13. Herrmann, Roland & Kramb, Marc Christopher & Moennich, Christina, 2000. "Tariff Rate Quotas And The Economic Impacts Of Agricultural Trade Liberalization In The Wto," Discussion Papers 26466, University of Giessen, Center for International Development and Environmental Research.
    14. Glebe, Thilo & Latacz-Lohmann, Uwe, 2007. "Agricultural multifunctionality and trade liberalisation," Cahiers d'Economie et de Sociologie Rurales (CESR), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 82.
    15. Pascal L. Ghazalian & Bruno Larue & Jean‐Philippe Gervais, 2009. "Exporting to new destinations and the effects of tariffs: the case of meat commodities," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 40(6), pages 701-714, November.
    16. Jörg-Volker Schrader, 2000. "CAP reform, the Berlin summit, and EU enlargement," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 35(5), pages 231-242, September.
    17. Alan Matthews, 2000. "The WTO agricultural trade negotiations after Seattle," Trinity Economics Papers 20005, Trinity College Dublin, Department of Economics.
    18. Edwards, Geoff & Fraser, Iain, 2001. "Reconsidering agri-environmental policy permitted by the Uruguay round agreement," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 313-326, May.
    19. Schrader, Jörg-Volker, 2000. "CAP Reform, the Berlin Summit, and EU Enlargement," Kiel Working Papers 973, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    20. Thilo Glebe & Uwe Latacz-Lohmann, 2007. "Agricultural multifunctionality and trade liberalisation," Post-Print hal-01201147, HAL.
    21. Thilo Glebe & Uwe Latacz-Lohmann, 2007. "Agricultural multifunctionality and trade liberalisation," Cahiers d'Economie et Sociologie Rurales, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 82, pages 57-73.
    22. Jones, Keithly G. & Blayney, Donald P., 2004. "Evaluating Trade Developments in Dairy Products," 2004 Annual Meeting, February 14-18, 2004, Tulsa, Oklahoma 34696, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    23. Gohin, Alexandre & Guyomard, Hervé, 2000. "The Agenda 2000 CAP Reform in the WTO Context: Distortion Effects of Compensatory Payments and Area Set-aside Requirements," 2000 Conference, August 13-18, 2000, Berlin, Germany 197222, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    24. Schmitz, P.M., 2000. "Integration der europäischen Land- und Ernährungswirtschaft in die Weltagrarwirtschaft: Chancen und Probleme," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 36.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:erevae:v:26:y:1999:i:3:p:371-88. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.