IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/erevae/v19y1992i3p331-50.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Policies for Nature and Landscape Conservation in Dutch Agriculture: An Evaluation of Objectives, Means, Effects and Programme Costs

Author

Listed:
  • Slangen, L H G

Abstract

In the Netherlands the policy for conserving nature and landscape in agriculture is largely prescriptive. Management agreements, the creation of nature reserves and maintenance agreements are the most important instruments the government uses to implement its policy. The government has decided to designate 200,000 hectares as management and reserve areas. This will require a sum of about 2,650 million gilders for land purchase and some 218 million gilders annually for management agreements and to meet the cost of managing and maintaining the nature reserves. These sums might seriously restrict the feasibility of the policies of land management in the future. Copyright 1992 by Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Slangen, L H G, 1992. "Policies for Nature and Landscape Conservation in Dutch Agriculture: An Evaluation of Objectives, Means, Effects and Programme Costs," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 19(3), pages 331-350.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:erevae:v:19:y:1992:i:3:p:331-50
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Abebayehu Tegene & Keith Wiebe & Betsey Kuhn, 1999. "Irreversible Investment Under Uncertainty: Conservation Easements and the Option to Develop Agricultural Land," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(2), pages 203-219, May.
    2. Hyytia, Nina & Kola, Jukka, 2005. "Citizens' Attitudes Towards Multifunctional Agriculture," 2005 International Congress, August 23-27, 2005, Copenhagen, Denmark 24736, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    3. Latacz-Lohmann, Uwe & Hodge, Ian D., 2003. "European agri-environmental policy for the 21st century," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 47(1), pages 1-17.
    4. Latacz-Lohmann, Uwe, 2000. "European Agri-Environmental Policy Facing the 21st Century," 2000 Conference (44th), January 23-25, 2000, Sydney, Australia 171918, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    5. Merlo, Maurizio & Ferro, Ottone & Povellato, Andrea, 1995. "Valuation and Remuneration of Countryside Stewardship Performed by Agriculture and Forestry," 1994 Conference, August 22-29, 1994, Harare, Zimbabwe 183402, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    6. Keith Wiebe & Abebayehu Tegene & Betsey Kuhn, 1997. "Managing Public And Private Land Through Partial Interests," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 15(2), pages 35-43, April.
    7. Marie-José Smits & Peter Driessen & Pieter Glasbergen, 2008. "Governing Agri-Environmental Schemes: Lessons to Be Learned from the New Institutional-Economics Approach," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 26(3), pages 627-643, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:erevae:v:19:y:1992:i:3:p:331-50. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.