IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/copoec/v31y2012i1p77-89.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On PIIGs, GAFFs, And BRICs: An Insider-Outsider's Perspective on Structural and Institutional Foundations of the Greek Crisis

Author

Listed:
  • Christos N. Pitelis

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Christos N. Pitelis, 2012. "On PIIGs, GAFFs, And BRICs: An Insider-Outsider's Perspective on Structural and Institutional Foundations of the Greek Crisis," Contributions to Political Economy, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 31(1), pages 77-89.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:copoec:v:31:y:2012:i:1:p:77-89
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cpe/bzs002
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Christos Pitelis, 2013. "Towards a More ‘Ethically Correct’ Governance for Economic Sustainability," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 118(3), pages 655-665, December.
    2. Samuel Brazys & Niamh Hardiman, 2013. "From Tiger to PIIGS: Ireland and the use of heuristics in comparative political economy," Working Papers 201316, Geary Institute, University College Dublin.
    3. Xanthippi Chapsa & Nikolaos Tabakis & Athanasios L. Athanasenas, 2018. "Investigating the Catching-Up Hypothesis Using Panel Unit Root Tests: Evidence from the PIIGS," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 250-271.
    4. repec:liu:liucej:v:14:y:2017:i:1:p:37-56 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Gioacchino Garofoli, 2017. "Virtuous and Vicious Circles: Lessons for Current European Policies from Italian Post-War Development," European Journal of Comparative Economics, Cattaneo University (LIUC), vol. 14(1), pages 39-58, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:copoec:v:31:y:2012:i:1:p:77-89. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.