IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cambje/v36y2012i5p1019-1032.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prospects for a heterodox economics of the environment and sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • Ali Douai
  • Andrew Mearman
  • Ioana Negru

Abstract

This paper introduces this special issue on heterodox economics of the environment and sustainability. At present humanity faces several challenges, such as resource scarcity, biodiversity loss and climate change. And yet, we would argue, contributions from traditional 'heterodox' schools of thought such as Post Keynesianism, Marxism and (to a lesser extent) Institutionalism have had relatively little to say about them. Instead, as discussed below, economic analysis of environmental issues has been dominated by approaches inspired by neoclassical economics; and latterly by 'ecological economics'. This special issue is part of an effort to stimulate more heterodox work on the environment, and to explore connections between existing groups of scholars; particularly between 'ecological' and 'heterodox' economists. The papers gathered in this special issue and their authors reflect different traditions but appear to share some ways of thinking. The papers in the special issue display the vigour and variety within heterodox approaches to the environment and sustainability. The papers themselves are summarised briefly in section 3, and referred to in other sections. Prior to that, section 2 attempts to summarise the state of play in the economics of the environment, and then proposes a conceptual map of contemporary 'ecological economics'.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Ali Douai & Andrew Mearman & Ioana Negru, 2012. "Prospects for a heterodox economics of the environment and sustainability," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 36(5), pages 1019-1032.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:36:y:2012:i:5:p:1019-1032
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cje/bes053
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Géraldine THIRY & Philippe ROMAN, 2015. "L’indice de richesse inclusive : l’économie Mainstream au-delà de ses limites, mais en deçà de la soutenabilité ?," LIDAM Discussion Papers IRES 2015001, Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de Recherches Economiques et Sociales (IRES).
    2. Valentina Erasmo, 2022. "“Econosophy”: Venturing a Transdisciplinary Approach to Philosophy and Economics," Annals of the Fondazione Luigi Einaudi. An Interdisciplinary Journal of Economics, History and Political Science, Fondazione Luigi Einaudi, Torino (Italy), vol. 56(2), pages 127-144, December.
    3. Gemma Cairó-i-Céspedes & David Castells-Quintana, 2016. "Dimensions of the current systemic crisis: Capitalism in short circuit?," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 16(1), pages 1-23, January.
    4. Gendron, Corinne, 2014. "Beyond environmental and ecological economics: Proposal for an economic sociology of the environment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 240-253.
    5. Ewa Dziwok & Johannes Jäger, 2021. "A Classification of Different Approaches to Green Finance and Green Monetary Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-15, October.
    6. Emanuele Felice, 2016. "The Misty Grail: The Search for a Comprehensive Measure of Development and the Reasons for GDP Primacy," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 47(5), pages 967-994, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:36:y:2012:i:5:p:1019-1032. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.