IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cambje/v33y2009i6p1153-1167.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economics, postcolonial theory and the problem of culture: institutional analysis and hybridity

Author

Listed:
  • Eiman O. Zein-Elabdin

Abstract

Postcolonial theory has not yet made an impact in economics. This may be explained by the different treatment of culture in each field. In postcolonial theory, culture serves as a central analytical category. In economics, despite increased attention in recent history, general approaches to culture continue to underestimate its role in economic behaviour and decision making. Borrowing some insights from postcolonial theory, this paper calls for further attention to culture in economics. It is argued that such a turn improves current understanding of contemporary economic phenomena, and allows subaltern cultures (currently theorised as less developed) to equally participate in the global construction of social meaning and economic well being. It is further argued that incorporating the postcolonial idea of hybridity into the institutional economic approach holds the most promise for theorising contemporary postcolonial economies. This argument is illustrated by examining some hybrid economic patterns within Africa. Copyright The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Cambridge Political Economy Society. All rights reserved., Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Eiman O. Zein-Elabdin, 2009. "Economics, postcolonial theory and the problem of culture: institutional analysis and hybridity," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 33(6), pages 1153-1167, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:33:y:2009:i:6:p:1153-1167
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cje/bep040
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alex Hughes & Cheryl McEwan & David Bek, 2015. "Postcolonial Perspectives on Global Production Networks: Insights from Flower Valley in South Africa," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 47(2), pages 249-266, February.
    2. Ortiz-Przychodzka, Stefan & Benavides-Frías, Camila & Raymond, Christopher M. & Díaz-Reviriego, Isabel & Hanspach, Jan, 2023. "Rethinking Economic Practices and Values As Assemblages of More-Than-Human Relations," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    3. Ingrid Harvold Kvangraven & Surbhi Kesar, 2021. "Standing in the Way of Rigor? Economics’ Meeting with the Decolonizing Agenda," Working Papers 2110, New School for Social Research, Department of Economics.
    4. N/A, 2016. "Winners of the Ashby prizes," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 48(11), pages 2103-2107, November.
    5. Madhavi Venkatesan & Fenner Dreyfuss-Wells & Anjali Nair & Astrid Pedersen & Vishnu Prasad, 2021. "Evaluating Conscious Consumption: A Discussion of a Survey Development Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-19, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:33:y:2009:i:6:p:1153-1167. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.