IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/biomet/v94y2007i3p661-672.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Recursive computing and simulation-free inference for general factorizable models

Author

Listed:
  • Nial Friel
  • Håvard Rue

Abstract

We illustrate how the recursive algorithm of Reeves & Pettitt (2004) for general factorizable models can be extended to allow exact sampling, maximization of distributions and computation of marginal distributions. All of the methods we describe apply to discrete-valued Markov random fields with nearest neighbour integrations defined on regular lattices; in particular we illustrate that exact inference can be performed for hidden autologistic models defined on moderately sized lattices. In this context we offer an extension of this methodology which allows approximate inference to be carried out for larger lattices without resorting to simulation techniques such as Markov chain Monte Carlo. In particular our work offers the basis for an automatic inference machine for such models. Copyright 2007, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Nial Friel & Håvard Rue, 2007. "Recursive computing and simulation-free inference for general factorizable models," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 94(3), pages 661-672.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:94:y:2007:i:3:p:661-672
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/biomet/asm052
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Håvard Rue & Ingelin Steinsland & Sveinung Erland, 2004. "Approximating hidden Gaussian Markov random fields," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 66(4), pages 877-892, November.
    2. R. Reeves, 2004. "Efficient recursions for general factorisable models," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 91(3), pages 751-757, September.
    3. Scott S. L., 2002. "Bayesian Methods for Hidden Markov Models: Recursive Computing in the 21st Century," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 97, pages 337-351, March.
    4. Julian Besag & Jeremy York & Annie Mollié, 1991. "Bayesian image restoration, with two applications in spatial statistics," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 43(1), pages 1-20, March.
    5. C. P. Robert & T. Rydén & D. M. Titterington, 2000. "Bayesian inference in hidden Markov models through the reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo method," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 62(1), pages 57-75.
    6. Ming Gao Gu & Hong‐Tu Zhu, 2001. "Maximum likelihood estimation for spatial models by Markov chain Monte Carlo stochastic approximation," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 63(2), pages 339-355.
    7. Francesco Bartolucci, 2002. "A recursive algorithm for Markov random fields," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 89(3), pages 724-730, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jin, Ick Hoon & Liang, Faming, 2014. "Use of SAMC for Bayesian analysis of statistical models with intractable normalizing constants," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 402-416.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wanchuang Zhu & Yanan Fan, 2023. "A synthetic likelihood approach for intractable markov random fields," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 38(2), pages 749-777, June.
    2. R. Reeves, 2004. "Efficient recursions for general factorisable models," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 91(3), pages 751-757, September.
    3. Solaiman Afroughi & Soghrat Faghihzadeh & Majid Jafari Khaledi & Mehdi Ghandehari Motlagh & Ebrahim Hajizadeh, 2011. "Analysis of clustered spatially correlated binary data using autologistic model and Bayesian method with an application to dental caries of 3--5-year-old children," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(12), pages 2763-2774, February.
    4. Magnussen, Steen & Reeves, Rob, 2008. "A method for bias-reduction of sample-based MLE of the autologistic model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 103-111, September.
    5. Cécile Hardouin & Xavier Guyon, 2014. "Recursions on the marginals and exact computation of the normalizing constant for Gibbs processes," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 29(6), pages 1637-1650, December.
    6. Vinicius Mayrink & Dani Gamerman, 2009. "On computational aspects of Bayesian spatial models: influence of the neighboring structure in the efficiency of MCMC algorithms," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 641-669, December.
    7. Lim, Johan & Wang, Xinlei & Sherman, Michael, 2007. "An adjustment for edge effects using an augmented neighborhood model in the spatial auto-logistic model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(8), pages 3679-3688, May.
    8. Bartolucci, Francesco, 2011. "An alternative to the Baum-Welch recursions for hidden Markov models," MPRA Paper 38778, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Hugh Christensen & Simon Godsill & Richard E Turner, 2020. "Hidden Markov Models Applied To Intraday Momentum Trading With Side Information," Papers 2006.08307, arXiv.org.
    10. Kobayashi, Kiyoshi & Kaito, Kiyoyuki & Lethanh, Nam, 2012. "A statistical deterioration forecasting method using hidden Markov model for infrastructure management," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(4), pages 544-561.
    11. Katie Wilson & Jon Wakefield, 2022. "A probabilistic model for analyzing summary birth history data," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 47(11), pages 291-344.
    12. Eibich, Peter & Ziebarth, Nicolas, 2014. "Examining the Structure of Spatial Health Effects in Germany Using Hierarchical Bayes Models," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 49, pages 305-320.
    13. Rulloni, Valeria, 2014. "Uniqueness condition for an auto-logistic model," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 1-6.
    14. Shreosi Sanyal & Thierry Rochereau & Cara Nichole Maesano & Laure Com-Ruelle & Isabella Annesi-Maesano, 2018. "Long-Term Effect of Outdoor Air Pollution on Mortality and Morbidity: A 12-Year Follow-Up Study for Metropolitan France," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-8, November.
    15. Mayer Alvo & Jingrui Mu, 2023. "COVID-19 Data Analysis Using Bayesian Models and Nonparametric Geostatistical Models," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-13, March.
    16. Gil, Guilherme Dôco Roberti & Costa, Marcelo Azevedo & Lopes, Ana Lúcia Miranda & Mayrink, Vinícius Diniz, 2017. "Spatial statistical methods applied to the 2015 Brazilian energy distribution benchmarking model: Accounting for unobserved determinants of inefficiencies," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 373-383.
    17. Vanessa Santos-Sánchez & Juan Antonio Córdoba-Doña & Javier García-Pérez & Antonio Escolar-Pujolar & Lucia Pozzi & Rebeca Ramis, 2020. "Cancer Mortality and Deprivation in the Proximity of Polluting Industrial Facilities in an Industrial Region of Spain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-15, March.
    18. Berti, Patrizia & Dreassi, Emanuela & Rigo, Pietro, 2014. "Compatibility results for conditional distributions," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 190-203.
    19. Louise Choo & Stephen G. Walker, 2008. "A new approach to investigating spatial variations of disease," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 171(2), pages 395-405, April.
    20. Young‐Geun Choi & Lawrence P. Hanrahan & Derek Norton & Ying‐Qi Zhao, 2022. "Simultaneous spatial smoothing and outlier detection using penalized regression, with application to childhood obesity surveillance from electronic health records," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(1), pages 324-336, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:94:y:2007:i:3:p:661-672. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/biomet .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.