IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v30y2019i1p57-67..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Counting crows: population structure and group size variation in an urban population of crows

Author

Listed:
  • Florian Uhl
  • Max Ringler
  • Rachael Miller
  • Sarah A Deventer
  • Thomas Bugnyar
  • Christine Schwab

Abstract

With data collected over a 1-year period, we detail the spatio-temporal structure of a flock of crows displaying distinct social categories. Presence of carrion and hooded crows was affected by the environmental factors that modulate the party size component of fission–fusion dynamics and thereby influence social complexity.

Suggested Citation

  • Florian Uhl & Max Ringler & Rachael Miller & Sarah A Deventer & Thomas Bugnyar & Christine Schwab, 2019. "Counting crows: population structure and group size variation in an urban population of crows," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 30(1), pages 57-67.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:30:y:2019:i:1:p:57-67.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/ary157
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guillermo Paz-y-Miño C & Alan B. Bond & Alan C. Kamil & Russell P. Balda, 2004. "Pinyon jays use transitive inference to predict social dominance," Nature, Nature, vol. 430(7001), pages 778-781, August.
    2. James J. H. St Clair & Zackory T. Burns & Elaine M. Bettaney & Michael B. Morrissey & Brian Otis & Thomas B. Ryder & Robert C. Fleischer & Richard James & Christian Rutz, 2015. "Experimental resource pulses influence social-network dynamics and the potential for information flow in tool-using crows," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 6(1), pages 1-8, November.
    3. Jorg J. M. Massen & Andrius Pašukonis & Judith Schmidt & Thomas Bugnyar, 2014. "Ravens notice dominance reversals among conspecifics within and outside their social group," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 5(1), pages 1-7, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elizabeth A Hobson & Simon DeDeo, 2015. "Social Feedback and the Emergence of Rank in Animal Society," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(9), pages 1-20, September.
    2. Ivan D Chase & W Brent Lindquist, 2016. "The Fragility of Individual-Based Explanations of Social Hierarchies: A Test Using Animal Pecking Orders," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(7), pages 1-16, July.
    3. Gifford Jr., Adam, 2009. "Cultural, cognition and human action," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 13-24, January.
    4. DeScioli, Peter & Krishna, Siddhi, 2013. "Giving to whom? Altruism in different types of relationships," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 218-228.
    5. Takashi Hotta & Kentaro Ueno & Yuya Hataji & Hika Kuroshima & Kazuo Fujita & Masanori Kohda, 2020. "Transitive inference in cleaner wrasses (Labroides dimidiatus)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-13, August.
    6. Daizaburo Shizuka & Allison E Johnson & Leigh Simmons, 2020. "How demographic processes shape animal social networks," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 31(1), pages 1-11.
    7. Greg Jensen & Fabian Muñoz & Yelda Alkan & Vincent P Ferrera & Herbert S Terrace, 2015. "Implicit Value Updating Explains Transitive Inference Performance: The Betasort Model," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(9), pages 1-27, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:30:y:2019:i:1:p:57-67.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.