IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0032904.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Corvid Re-Caching without ‘Theory of Mind’: A Model

Author

Listed:
  • Elske van der Vaart
  • Rineke Verbrugge
  • Charlotte K Hemelrijk

Abstract

Scrub jays are thought to use many tactics to protect their caches. For instance, they predominantly bury food far away from conspecifics, and if they must cache while being watched, they often re-cache their worms later, once they are in private. Two explanations have been offered for such observations, and they are intensely debated. First, the birds may reason about their competitors' mental states, with a ‘theory of mind’; alternatively, they may apply behavioral rules learned in daily life. Although this second hypothesis is cognitively simpler, it does seem to require a different, ad-hoc behavioral rule for every caching and re-caching pattern exhibited by the birds. Our new theory avoids this drawback by explaining a large variety of patterns as side-effects of stress and the resulting memory errors. Inspired by experimental data, we assume that re-caching is not motivated by a deliberate effort to safeguard specific caches from theft, but by a general desire to cache more. This desire is brought on by stress, which is determined by the presence and dominance of onlookers, and by unsuccessful recovery attempts. We study this theory in two experiments similar to those done with real birds with a kind of ‘virtual bird’, whose behavior depends on a set of basic assumptions about corvid cognition, and a well-established model of human memory. Our results show that the ‘virtual bird’ acts as the real birds did; its re-caching reflects whether it has been watched, how dominant its onlooker was, and how close to that onlooker it has cached. This happens even though it cannot attribute mental states, and it has only a single behavioral rule assumed to be previously learned. Thus, our simulations indicate that corvid re-caching can be explained without sophisticated social cognition. Given our specific predictions, our theory can easily be tested empirically.

Suggested Citation

  • Elske van der Vaart & Rineke Verbrugge & Charlotte K Hemelrijk, 2012. "Corvid Re-Caching without ‘Theory of Mind’: A Model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(3), pages 1-8, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0032904
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032904
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0032904
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0032904&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0032904?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. N. J. Emery & N. S. Clayton, 2001. "Effects of experience and social context on prospective caching strategies by scrub jays," Nature, Nature, vol. 414(6862), pages 443-446, November.
    2. Guillermo Paz-y-Miño C & Alan B. Bond & Alan C. Kamil & Russell P. Balda, 2004. "Pinyon jays use transitive inference to predict social dominance," Nature, Nature, vol. 430(7001), pages 778-781, August.
    3. C. R. Raby & D. M. Alexis & A. Dickinson & N. S. Clayton, 2007. "Planning for the future by western scrub-jays," Nature, Nature, vol. 445(7130), pages 919-921, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elizabeth A Hobson & Simon DeDeo, 2015. "Social Feedback and the Emergence of Rank in Animal Society," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(9), pages 1-20, September.
    2. Karbowski, Adam, 2011. "O kilku modelach samolubnego karania w ekonomii behawioralnej [Evolution of altruism in the light of behavioral economics]," MPRA Paper 69604, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Marusha Dekleva & Valérie Dufour & Han de Vries & Berry M Spruijt & Elisabeth H M Sterck, 2011. "Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) Fail a What-Where-When Task but Find Rewards by Using a Location-Based Association Strategy," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(2), pages 1-11, February.
    4. Florian Uhl & Max Ringler & Rachael Miller & Sarah A Deventer & Thomas Bugnyar & Christine Schwab, 2019. "Counting crows: population structure and group size variation in an urban population of crows," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 30(1), pages 57-67.
    5. Elias Khalil, 2009. "Natural selection and rational decision: two concepts of optimization," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 417-435, June.
    6. Gifford Jr., Adam, 2009. "Cultural, cognition and human action," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 13-24, January.
    7. DeScioli, Peter & Krishna, Siddhi, 2013. "Giving to whom? Altruism in different types of relationships," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 218-228.
    8. Takashi Hotta & Kentaro Ueno & Yuya Hataji & Hika Kuroshima & Kazuo Fujita & Masanori Kohda, 2020. "Transitive inference in cleaner wrasses (Labroides dimidiatus)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-13, August.
    9. Gifford, Adam, 2013. "Sociality, trust, kinship and cultural evolution," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 218-227.
    10. Ivan D Chase & W Brent Lindquist, 2016. "The Fragility of Individual-Based Explanations of Social Hierarchies: A Test Using Animal Pecking Orders," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(7), pages 1-16, July.
    11. Marie-Claire Cammaerts & Roger Cammaerts, 2022. "A Synthesis of Six Recent Studies on Numerosity Abilities in an Ant," Journal of Biology and Life Science, Macrothink Institute, vol. 13(1), pages 1-23, February.
    12. Geerat Vermeij, 2009. "Comparative economics: evolution and the modern economy," Journal of Bioeconomics, Springer, vol. 11(2), pages 105-134, August.
    13. Johanni Brea & Nicola S. Clayton & Wulfram Gerstner, 2023. "Computational models of episodic-like memory in food-caching birds," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    14. Adam Gifford, 2009. "Rationality and intertemporal choice," Journal of Bioeconomics, Springer, vol. 11(3), pages 223-248, December.
    15. Hiroshi Ohta, 2020. "The Analysis of Japan’s Energy and Climate Policy from the Aspect of Anticipatory Governance," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-22, October.
    16. Greg Jensen & Fabian Muñoz & Yelda Alkan & Vincent P Ferrera & Herbert S Terrace, 2015. "Implicit Value Updating Explains Transitive Inference Performance: The Betasort Model," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(9), pages 1-27, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0032904. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.