IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v28y2017i3p874-882..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Individual aggression, but not winner–loser effects, predicts social rank in male domestic fowl

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Favati
  • Hanne Løvlie
  • Olof Leimar

Abstract

Lay Summary We show that winning or losing a contest change male aggressiveness, and that aggressiveness predicts future social rank better than winner–loser effects. Although aggression is often associated with winning a contest, little is known about how winning or losing predict future aggression. Further, the relative importance of aggression and recent contest experiences for establishment of future dominance relationships is unclear. Our study improves the understanding of factors affecting the outcome of male–male dominance interactions.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Favati & Hanne Løvlie & Olof Leimar, 2017. "Individual aggression, but not winner–loser effects, predicts social rank in male domestic fowl," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 28(3), pages 874-882.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:28:y:2017:i:3:p:874-882.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arx053
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Francesca Santostefano & Alastair J. Wilson & Yimen G. Araya-Ajoy & Niels J. Dingemanse, 2016. "Interacting with the enemy: indirect effects of personality on conspecific aggression in crickets," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 27(4), pages 1235-1246.
    2. Winnie Courtene-Jones & Mark Briffa, 2014. "Boldness and asymmetric contests: role- and outcome-dependent effects of fighting in hermit crabs," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(5), pages 1073-1082.
    3. Michael M. Kasumovic & Damian O. Elias & Senthurran Sivalinghem & Andrew C. Mason & Maydianne C.B. Andrade, 2010. "Examination of prior contest experience and the retention of winner and loser effects," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 21(2), pages 404-409.
    4. Cody J. Dey & James S. Quinn, 2014. "Individual attributes and self-organizational processes affect dominance network structure in pukeko," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(6), pages 1402-1408.
    5. Lee Alan Dugatkin & Ryan L. Earley, 2003. "Group fusion: the impact of winner, loser, and bystander effects on hierarchy formation in large groups," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 14(3), pages 367-373, May.
    6. Anna Favati & Josefina Zidar & Hanne Thorpe & Per Jensen & Hanne Løvlie, 2016. "The ontogeny of personality traits in the red junglefowl, Gallus gallus," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 27(2), pages 484-493.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hanyuan Huang & Jiabin Wu, 2021. "Limited Cognitive Abilities and Dominance Hierarchy," Papers 2103.11075, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2022.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Owen G. Ward & Jing Wu & Tian Zheng & Anna L. Smith & James P. Curley, 2022. "Network Hawkes process models for exploring latent hierarchy in social animal interactions," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 71(5), pages 1402-1426, November.
    2. Changwei Yuan & Jinrui Zhu & Shuai Zhang & Jiannan Zhao & Shibo Zhu, 2024. "Analysis of the Spatial Correlation Network and Driving Mechanism of China’s Transportation Carbon Emission Intensity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-23, April.
    3. Bawan Amin & Dómhnall J Jennings & Alison Norman & Andrew Ryan & Vasiliki Ioannidis & Alice Magee & Hayley-Anne Haughey & Amy Haigh & Simone Ciuti, 2022. "Neonate personality affects early-life resource acquisition in a large social mammal [An analysis of vigilance in the Spanish ibex (Capra pyrenaica)]," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 33(5), pages 1025-1035.
    4. Clare C. Rittschof & Samantha A. Hilber & M. Scarlett Tudor & Colette M. St Mary, 2012. "Modeling male reproductive strategies and optimal mate number in an orb-web spider," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(1), pages 1-10.
    5. Elizabeth A Hobson & Simon DeDeo, 2015. "Social Feedback and the Emergence of Rank in Animal Society," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(9), pages 1-20, September.
    6. Cody J. Dey & James S. Quinn, 2014. "Individual attributes and self-organizational processes affect dominance network structure in pukeko," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(6), pages 1402-1408.
    7. Nathan W Bailey & Lucas Marie-Orleach & Allen J Moore & Leigh SimmonsEditor-in-Chief, 2018. "Indirect genetic effects in behavioral ecology: does behavior play a special role in evolution?," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 29(1), pages 1-11.
    8. Gong, Yuanyuan & Sun, Hui & Wang, Zhiwei & Ding, Chenxin, 2023. "Spatial correlation network pattern and evolution mechanism of natural gas consumption in China—Complex network-based ERGM model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:28:y:2017:i:3:p:874-882.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.