IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v26y2015i1p83-90..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rates of signal evolution are associated with the nature of interspecific communication

Author

Listed:
  • David Wheatcroft
  • Trevor D. Price

Abstract

Some signals vary greatly, whereas others are remarkably similar across distantly related species. Here, we ask how the suite of receivers and information communicated correlates with signal evolution by comparing 2 different signals across the same set of species. Within the Old World leaf warblers (Phylloscopidae), each species utters 2 acoustically distinct alarm calls. The first, termed a "general" call, is used in interactions with conspecifics as a well as during confrontations with predators and nest-parasitic cuckoos. The second, termed a "rasp" call, is primarily used in the presence of nest-parasitic cuckoos. The rasp call precedes aggressive attacks on cuckoos and attracts surrounding heterospecifics that are also potential hosts. The general call attracts a wide range of species threatened by predators, including those that are not cuckoo hosts. Acoustic features of general calls evolve >5× faster than rasp calls. We argue that rasp calls show strong stasis because they have a restricted function as aggressive antiparasite signals, whereas multiple contexts and receivers have promoted divergence in general calls. These results support the idea that variation in the suite of receivers is a powerful force affecting signal evolution.

Suggested Citation

  • David Wheatcroft & Trevor D. Price, 2015. "Rates of signal evolution are associated with the nature of interspecific communication," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(1), pages 83-90.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:26:y:2015:i:1:p:83-90.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/aru161
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. N. E. Langmore & W. E. Feeney & J. Crowe-Riddell & H. Luan & K. M. Louwrens & A. Cockburn, 2012. "Learned recognition of brood parasitic cuckoos in the superb fairy-wren Malurus cyaneus," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(4), pages 798-805.
    2. Branislav Igic & Robert D. Magrath, 2014. "A songbird mimics different heterospecific alarm calls in response to different types of threat," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(3), pages 538-548.
    3. C. Lindstedt & H. Eager & E. Ihalainen & A. Kahilainen & M. Stevens & J. Mappes, 2011. "Direction and strength of selection by predators for the color of the aposematic wood tiger moth," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 22(3), pages 580-587.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jason T Weir & Trevor D Price, 2019. "Song playbacks demonstrate slower evolution of song discrimination in birds from Amazonia than from temperate North America," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(10), pages 1-19, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Justin A. Welbergen & Nicholas B. Davies, 2012. "Direct and indirect assessment of parasitism risk by a cuckoo host," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(4), pages 783-789.
    2. William E. Feeney & Mary Caswell Stoddard & Rebecca M. Kilner & Naomi E. Langmore, 2014. ""Jack-of-all-trades" egg mimicry in the brood parasitic Horsfield’s bronze-cuckoo?," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(6), pages 1365-1373.
    3. Peter Olsson & Olle Lind & Almut Kelber & Leigh Simmons, 2018. "Chromatic and achromatic vision: parameter choice and limitations for reliable model predictions," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 29(2), pages 273-282.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:26:y:2015:i:1:p:83-90.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.