IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v22y2011i3p580-587.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Direction and strength of selection by predators for the color of the aposematic wood tiger moth

Author

Listed:
  • C. Lindstedt
  • H. Eager
  • E. Ihalainen
  • A. Kahilainen
  • M. Stevens
  • J. Mappes

Abstract

Conventionally, predation is assumed to select for conspicuousness and uniformity of warning signals in aposematic (i.e., chemically defended and warning signaling) prey because this enhances predators' initial and learned avoidance. On the other hand, it has been suggested that both variation in the background where the signal is displayed as well as variation in predators' probability to attack defended prey may favor intermediate signals or relax selection for signal monomorphism. We studied the direction and strength of selection for the hind wing color (orange vs. red) of female Parasemia plantaginis moths. Birds found the moths aversive and avoided them by sight both in laboratory and field experiments. A laboratory experiment with great tits showed that birds can discriminate between orange and red wings and attack red females less than orange females. This directional selection should decrease variation in hind wing color. However, the hind wing color did not significantly affect the "survival" of dead specimens under natural field conditions in a multipredator community. In addition, even though both orange and red were highly conspicuous against green leaves and silver birch trunks (backgrounds used in the studies), the magnitude of avian-perceived chromatic contrast (conspicuousness) differed against these backgrounds. Our results suggest that depending on the signal environment (background, predator community) directional selection for the warning signal monomorphism can be relaxed. Copyright 2011, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • C. Lindstedt & H. Eager & E. Ihalainen & A. Kahilainen & M. Stevens & J. Mappes, 2011. "Direction and strength of selection by predators for the color of the aposematic wood tiger moth," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 22(3), pages 580-587.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:22:y:2011:i:3:p:580-587
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arr017
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Peter Olsson & Olle Lind & Almut Kelber & Leigh Simmons, 2018. "Chromatic and achromatic vision: parameter choice and limitations for reliable model predictions," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 29(2), pages 273-282.
    2. David Wheatcroft & Trevor D. Price, 2015. "Rates of signal evolution are associated with the nature of interspecific communication," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(1), pages 83-90.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:22:y:2011:i:3:p:580-587. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.