IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v25y2014i6p1298..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring cognition will be difficult but worth it: a response to comments on Rowe and Healy

Author

Listed:
  • Candy Rowe
  • Susan D. Healy

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Candy Rowe & Susan D. Healy, 2014. "Measuring cognition will be difficult but worth it: a response to comments on Rowe and Healy," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(6), pages 1298-1298.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:25:y:2014:i:6:p:1298.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/aru190
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alex Thornton & Jess Isden & Joah R. Madden, 2014. "Toward wild psychometrics: linking individual cognitive differences to fitness," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(6), pages 1299-1301.
    2. Carel ten Cate, 2014. "Towards fruitful interaction between behavioral ecology and cognitive science: a comment on Rowe and Healy," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(6), pages 1295-1296.
    3. Alex Thornton, 2014. "How and why are some species so smart? A comment on Rowe and Healy," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(6), pages 1294-1295.
    4. Candy Rowe & Susan D. Healy, 2014. "Measuring variation in cognition," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(6), pages 1287-1292.
    5. John L. Quinn & Ella F. Cole & Julie Morand-Ferron, 2014. "Studying microevolutionary processes in cognitive traits: a comment on Rowe and Healy," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(6), pages 1297-1298.
    6. Louise Barrett, 2014. "What counts as (non) cognitive? A comment on Rowe and Healy," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(6), pages 1293-1294.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. R. Croston & C.L. Branch & D.Y. Kozlovsky & R. Dukas & V.V. Pravosudov, 2015. "Heritability and the evolution of cognitive traits," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(6), pages 1447-1459.
    2. Niclas Kolm, 2014. "Measuring variation in cognition can be done, but it requires hard empirical work: a comment on Rowe and Healy," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(6), pages 1296-1297.
    3. Alex Thornton, 2014. "How and why are some species so smart? A comment on Rowe and Healy," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(6), pages 1294-1295.
    4. Li Li & Cwyn Solvi & Feng Zhang & Zhaoyang Qi & Lars Chittka & Wei Zhao, 2021. "Gut microbiome drives individual memory variation in bumblebees," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-10, December.
    5. John L. Quinn & Ella F. Cole & Julie Morand-Ferron, 2014. "Studying microevolutionary processes in cognitive traits: a comment on Rowe and Healy," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(6), pages 1297-1298.
    6. van Horik, Jayden O. & Langley, Ellis J.G. & Whiteside, Mark A. & Madden, Joah R., 2019. "A single factor explanation for associative learning performance on colour discrimination problems in common pheasants (Phasianus colchicus)," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 53-61.
    7. MacKinlay, Regan D. & Shaw, Rachael C., 2019. "Male New Zealand robin (Petroica longipes) song repertoire size does not correlate with cognitive performance in the wild," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 25-33.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:25:y:2014:i:6:p:1298.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.