IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/intell/v74y2019icp53-61.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A single factor explanation for associative learning performance on colour discrimination problems in common pheasants (Phasianus colchicus)

Author

Listed:
  • van Horik, Jayden O.
  • Langley, Ellis J.G.
  • Whiteside, Mark A.
  • Madden, Joah R.

Abstract

It remains unclear whether performance of non-human animals on cognitive test batteries can be explained by domain general cognitive processes, as is found in humans. The persistence of this dispute is likely to stem from a lack of clarity of the psychological or neural processes involved. One broadly accepted cognitive process, that may predict performance in a range of psychometric tasks, is associative learning. We therefore investigated intra-individual performances on tasks that incorporate processes of associative learning, by assessing the speed of acquisition and reversal learning in up to 187 pheasants (Phasianus colchicus) on four related binary colour discrimination tasks. We found a strong, positive significant bivariate relationship between an individual's acquisition and reversal learning performances on one cue set. Weak, positive significant bivariate relationships were also found between an individual's performance on pairs of reversal tasks and between the acquisition and reversal performances on different cue sets. A single factor, robust to parallel analysis, explained 36% of variation in performance across tasks. Inter-individual variation could not be explained by differential prior experience, age, sex or body condition. We propose that a single factor explanation, which we call ‘a’, summarises the covariance among scores obtained from these visual discrimination tasks, as they all assess capacities for associative learning. We argue that ‘a’ may represent an underlying cognitive ability exhibited by an individual, which manifests across a variety of tasks requiring associative processes.

Suggested Citation

  • van Horik, Jayden O. & Langley, Ellis J.G. & Whiteside, Mark A. & Madden, Joah R., 2019. "A single factor explanation for associative learning performance on colour discrimination problems in common pheasants (Phasianus colchicus)," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 53-61.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:intell:v:74:y:2019:i:c:p:53-61
    DOI: 10.1016/j.intell.2018.07.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289617303586
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.intell.2018.07.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alison Bell, 2013. "Randomized or fixed order for studies of behavioral syndromes?," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(1), pages 16-20.
    2. Candy Rowe & Susan D. Healy, 2014. "Measuring variation in cognition," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(6), pages 1287-1292.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li Li & Cwyn Solvi & Feng Zhang & Zhaoyang Qi & Lars Chittka & Wei Zhao, 2021. "Gut microbiome drives individual memory variation in bumblebees," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-10, December.
    2. John L. Quinn & Ella F. Cole & Julie Morand-Ferron, 2014. "Studying microevolutionary processes in cognitive traits: a comment on Rowe and Healy," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(6), pages 1297-1298.
    3. Candy Rowe & Susan D. Healy, 2014. "Measuring cognition will be difficult but worth it: a response to comments on Rowe and Healy," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(6), pages 1298-1298.
    4. R. Croston & C.L. Branch & D.Y. Kozlovsky & R. Dukas & V.V. Pravosudov, 2015. "Heritability and the evolution of cognitive traits," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(6), pages 1447-1459.
    5. Niclas Kolm, 2014. "Measuring variation in cognition can be done, but it requires hard empirical work: a comment on Rowe and Healy," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(6), pages 1296-1297.
    6. Cammy Beyts & Maddalena Cella & Nick Colegrave & Roger Downie & Julien G A Martin & Patrick Walsh, 2023. "The effect of heterospecific and conspecific competition on inter-individual differences in tungara frog tadpole (Engystomops pustulosus) behavior," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 34(2), pages 210-222.
    7. Alex Thornton, 2014. "How and why are some species so smart? A comment on Rowe and Healy," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(6), pages 1294-1295.
    8. MacKinlay, Regan D. & Shaw, Rachael C., 2019. "Male New Zealand robin (Petroica longipes) song repertoire size does not correlate with cognitive performance in the wild," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 25-33.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:intell:v:74:y:2019:i:c:p:53-61. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/intelligence .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.