IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v23y2012i3p607-614..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal marauding in bowerbirds

Author

Listed:
  • Stephen Pruett-Jones
  • Aviad Heifetz

Abstract

In bowerbirds, males display at bowers but also attempt to destroy the bowers and steal decorations of other males. We develop a game theoretic model to examine optimal marauding behavior in male bowerbirds under the assumption that males have limited amounts of time away from their bower. We model interactions among neighboring males as a stochastic Markovian process and calculate fitness of males as it relates to the amount of time spent marauding. The results are that there are 2 possible evolutionary stable strategy (ESS) profiles: If bower repair time is short (relative to foraging), males should not maraud at all; in contrast, if bower repair time is long, males should maraud at the maximal level. We extend the model in 2 ways: First, allowing for variation in the males’ likelihood of mating, the ESS changes when bower repair time is short. The male mostly likely to mate does not maraud at all, whereas his rival marauds at the maximal level. Second, allowing for variation in males’ abilities to repair their bower, the ESS for the male that can repair his bower quickly is always to maraud, whereas the ESS for the other male (the male who takes longer to repair his bower) is never to maraud but instead to guard his bower. These results suggest that bower marauding may be a dynamic interaction between males, one that varies with ecological factors, and also that interactions may differ between different sets of males.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen Pruett-Jones & Aviad Heifetz, 2012. "Optimal marauding in bowerbirds," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(3), pages 607-614.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:23:y:2012:i:3:p:607-614.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/ars004
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sheila M. Reynolds & Mary C. Christman & J. Albert C. Uy & Gail L. Patricelli & Michael J. Braun & Gerald Borgia, 2009. "Lekking satin bowerbird males aggregate with relatives to mitigate aggression," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 20(2), pages 410-415.
    2. Janine M. Wojcieszek & James A. Nicholls & Anne W. Goldizen, 2007. "Stealing behavior and the maintenance of a visual display in the satin bowerbird," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 18(4), pages 689-695.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jason Keagy & Jean-François Savard & Gerald Borgia, 2012. "Cognitive ability and the evolution of multiple behavioral display traits," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(2), pages 448-456.
    2. Sheila M. Reynolds & J. Albert C. Uy & Gail L. Patricelli & Seth W. Coleman & Michael J. Braun & Gerald Borgia, 2014. "Tests of the kin selection model of mate choice and inbreeding avoidance in satin bowerbirds," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(4), pages 1005-1014.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:23:y:2012:i:3:p:607-614.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.