IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v25y2014i3p591-603..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Playback tests and studies of animal contest dynamics: concepts and an example in the gray tree frog

Author

Listed:
  • Michael S. Reichert

Abstract

Animal contests can greatly impact individual fitness; therefore, the behavioral strategies used during contests have received much interest in both theoretical and empirical studies. Recent reviews of animal contest behavior have clarified the predictions for contest dynamics when individuals’ behavioral strategies are based on influences of self, opponent, or both. These predictions mostly apply to natural or staged interactions between 2 competing animals, but studies of aggressive signaling behavior often use other methodologies. In particular, playback tests have been heavily utilized because they provide the investigator with powerful control over experimental conditions. My aims in this paper are 2-fold. First, I discuss how playback tests can be used to study animal contest dynamics. Specifically, I develop predictions for individuals’ responses to playback tests that will allow investigators to discriminate between different contest strategies. By monitoring individual persistence, resource-holding potential (or its correlates as reflected in signal structure), and other behaviors in appropriately designed playback tests, I show that strategies based on influences of self, opponent, and both self and opponent can be discriminated. Second, I illustrate these methods with data from a playback experiment on male responses to acoustic signals in the gray tree frog, Hyla versicolor. Males’ responses to playbacks of synthetic advertisement and aggressive calls that varied in call frequency indicated that both self and opponent characteristics influenced persistence in contests.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael S. Reichert, 2014. "Playback tests and studies of animal contest dynamics: concepts and an example in the gray tree frog," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(3), pages 591-603.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:25:y:2014:i:3:p:591-603.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/aru030
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael S. Reichert & H. Carl Gerhardt, 2013. "Socially mediated plasticity in call timing in the gray tree frog, Hyla versicolor," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(2), pages 393-401.
    2. D. H. Brunton & B. Evans & T. Cope & W. Ji, 2008. "A test of the dear enemy hypothesis in female New Zealand bellbirds (Anthornis melanura): female neighbors as threats," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 19(4), pages 791-798.
    3. Mark A. Bee, 2002. "Territorial male bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana) do not assess fighting ability based on size-related variation in acoustic signals," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 13(1), pages 109-124, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael S. Reichert & H. Carl Gerhardt, 2014. "Behavioral strategies and signaling in interspecific aggressive interactions in gray tree frogs," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(3), pages 520-530.
    2. Emily R.A. Cramer, 2013. "Vocal deviation and trill consistency do not affect male response to playback in house wrens," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(2), pages 412-420.
    3. Ada M. Grabowska-Zhang & Teddy A. Wilkin & Ben C. Sheldon, 2012. "Effects of neighbor familiarity on reproductive success in the great tit (Parus major)," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(2), pages 322-333.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:25:y:2014:i:3:p:591-603.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.