IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v25y2014i3p520-530..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Behavioral strategies and signaling in interspecific aggressive interactions in gray tree frogs

Author

Listed:
  • Michael S. Reichert
  • H. Carl Gerhardt

Abstract

Interspecific aggression has important consequences for ecological processes and the evolution of behavioral strategies. We examined interspecific aggressive interactions in the 2 gray tree frog species, Hyla chrysoscelis and Hyla versicolor. These species call side by side in the same ponds, and acoustic interference occurs because of the similar spectral characteristics of their vocalizations. The aggressive calls of these 2 species, although very similar, were statistically distinguishable: calls of H. chrysoscelis were more strongly amplitude modulated than those of H. versicolor. We used playbacks and staged interactions to characterize the behaviors of males exposed to heterospecific competitors or their signals. Males readily responded with aggression to heterospecific individuals and playbacks of their calls. These behaviors were qualitatively similar in both intraspecific and interspecific interactions, but there were some significant differences. First, males of H. chrysoscelis were more aggressive toward playbacks of conspecific advertisement calls than toward those of H. versicolor. There were no significant differences in this respect in H. versicolor. Second, interspecific interactions were usually more escalated than intraspecific interactions and more likely to end with the loser moving away from its opponent. Although neither species had an advantage in staged interactions, behavioral responses were asymmetrical because H. versicolor was more likely than H. chrysoscelis to initiate physical contact. Previous studies showed that H. versicolor suffers from a greater reduction in attractiveness than H. chrysoscelis in the presence of heterospecific call overlap. Thus, the asymmetries in aggressive behavior between the 2 species may be related to differential costs of heterospecific competition.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael S. Reichert & H. Carl Gerhardt, 2014. "Behavioral strategies and signaling in interspecific aggressive interactions in gray tree frogs," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(3), pages 520-530.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:25:y:2014:i:3:p:520-530.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/aru016
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sarah C. Humfeld, 2013. "Condition-dependent signaling and adoption of mating tactics in an amphibian with energetic displays," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(4), pages 859-870.
    2. Michael S. Reichert & H. Carl Gerhardt, 2013. "Socially mediated plasticity in call timing in the gray tree frog, Hyla versicolor," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(2), pages 393-401.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christina. J. Painting & Gregory I. Holwell, 2014. "Flexible alternative mating tactics by New Zealand giraffe weevils," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(6), pages 1409-1416.
    2. Michael S. Reichert, 2014. "Playback tests and studies of animal contest dynamics: concepts and an example in the gray tree frog," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(3), pages 591-603.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:25:y:2014:i:3:p:520-530.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.