IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v24y2013i3p708-716..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do women’s preferences for men’s facial hair change with reproductive status?

Author

Listed:
  • Barnaby J. Dixson
  • Jamie C. Tam
  • Monica Awasthy

Abstract

Women’s preferences for masculine traits are reported to be greater among young reproductively capable women, particularly just prior to ovulation, than among pregnant and postmenopausal women. This study is the first to investigate whether women’s preferences for men’s facial hair follow this pattern. We conducted surveys quantifying reproductive status and attractiveness ratings for facial hair (clean-shaven, light stubble, heavy stubble, and full beards) among 426 women from Wellington City, New Zealand. Results showed that pregnant, pre- and postmenopausal women rated faces that were clean-shaven, or with light and heavy stubble, as more attractive than full beards. Postmenopausal women gave higher scores for all degrees of facial hair, including full beards, than premenopausal and pregnant women. Premenopausal women at the high fertility phases of the menstrual cycle gave higher ratings for heavy stubble than participants at the low fertility phase or who were using contraceptives. However, these differences were not statistically significant, and the main effects were driven primarily by the low ratings ascribed to full beards. Women with partners that were clean-shaven judged clean-shaven faces as most attractive, whereas women with partners with heavy stubble or full beards judged heavy stubble as most attractive. Although women’s current partner and father’s degree of beardedness were positively correlated, their fathers’ beardedness showed little relationship to attractiveness judgments of facial hair. These results demonstrate that all women by no means consider beards unattractive. However, preferences vary only subtly with respect to hormonal, reproductive, and relationship status.

Suggested Citation

  • Barnaby J. Dixson & Jamie C. Tam & Monica Awasthy, 2013. "Do women’s preferences for men’s facial hair change with reproductive status?," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(3), pages 708-716.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:24:y:2013:i:3:p:708-716.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/ars211
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barnaby J. Dixson & Paul L. Vasey, 2012. "Beards augment perceptions of men's age, social status, and aggressiveness, but not attractiveness," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(3), pages 481-490.
    2. Markus J. Rantala & Mari Pölkki & Liisa M. Rantala, 2010. "Preference for human male body hair changes across the menstrual cycle and menopause," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 21(2), pages 419-423.
    3. Anthony C. Little & Julieanne Connely & David R. Feinberg & Benedict C. Jones & S. Craig Roberts, 2011. "Human preference for masculinity differs according to context in faces, bodies, voices, and smell," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 22(4), pages 862-868.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sung-Bum Kim & Seunghwan Lee & Dae-Young Kim, 2018. "The effect of service providers’ facial hair on restaurant customers’ perceptions," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 12(2), pages 277-303, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Barnaby J. Dixson & Paul L. Vasey, 2012. "Beards augment perceptions of men's age, social status, and aggressiveness, but not attractiveness," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(3), pages 481-490.
    2. Mittal, Sarah & Silvera, David H., 2021. "It grows on you: Perceptions of sales/service personnel with facial hair," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 604-613.
    3. Steven C. Hertler, 2015. "Toward a Biology of Collectivism," SAGE Open, , vol. 5(2), pages 21582440155, June.
    4. Ho Fai Chan & Ahmed Skali & David Stadelmann & Benno Torgler & Stephen Whyte, 2021. "Masculinity cues, perceptions of politician attributes, and political behavior," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(1), pages 148-171, March.
    5. Benedict C. Jones & David R. Feinberg & Christopher D. Watkins & Corey L. Fincher & Anthony C. Little & Lisa M. DeBruine, 2013. "Pathogen disgust predicts women’s preferences for masculinity in men’s voices, faces, and bodies," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(2), pages 373-379.
    6. Borau, Sylvie & Bonnefon, Jean-François, 2020. "Gendered products act as the extended phenotype of human sexual dimorphism: They increase physical attractiveness and desirability," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 498-508.
    7. Shawn N Geniole & Thomas F Denson & Barnaby J Dixson & Justin M Carré & Cheryl M McCormick, 2015. "Evidence from Meta-Analyses of the Facial Width-to-Height Ratio as an Evolved Cue of Threat," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-18, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:24:y:2013:i:3:p:708-716.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.