IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v24y2013i2p373-379..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pathogen disgust predicts women’s preferences for masculinity in men’s voices, faces, and bodies

Author

Listed:
  • Benedict C. Jones
  • David R. Feinberg
  • Christopher D. Watkins
  • Corey L. Fincher
  • Anthony C. Little
  • Lisa M. DeBruine

Abstract

Recent studies suggest that pathogen-related factors may contribute to systematic variation in women’s preferences for masculinity in men’s faces. However, there is very little evidence for similar correlations between pathogen-related factors and women’s preferences for masculinity in other domains (e.g., men’s voices or bodies). Consequently, we conducted a series of studies to examine whether pathogen disgust (assessed using Tybur et al’s Three Domains of Disgust Scale) predicts individual differences in women’s preferences for masculine characteristics in men’s voices, bodies, and faces. We also tested if pathogen disgust predicts individual differences in measures of women’s actual mate choices in the same way. We observed positive correlations between women’s pathogen disgust and their preferences for masculinity in men’s voices (Study 1) and faces and bodies (Study 2). We also observed positive correlations between women’s pathogen disgust and their masculinity ratings of both their current and ideal romantic partners (Study 3). Each of these correlations was independent of the possible effects of women’s sexual and moral disgust. Together, these findings suggest that individual differences in pathogen disgust predict individual differences in women’s masculinity preferences across multiple domains and may also predict individual differences in their actual mate choices.

Suggested Citation

  • Benedict C. Jones & David R. Feinberg & Christopher D. Watkins & Corey L. Fincher & Anthony C. Little & Lisa M. DeBruine, 2013. "Pathogen disgust predicts women’s preferences for masculinity in men’s voices, faces, and bodies," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(2), pages 373-379.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:24:y:2013:i:2:p:373-379.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/ars173
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jovana Vukovic & Benedict C. Jones & Lisa DeBruine & David R. Feinberg & Finlay G. Smith & Anthony C. Little & Lisa L. M. Welling & Julie Main, 2010. "Women's own voice pitch predicts their preferences for masculinity in men's voices," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 21(4), pages 767-772.
    2. Anthony C. Little & Julieanne Connely & David R. Feinberg & Benedict C. Jones & S. Craig Roberts, 2011. "Human preference for masculinity differs according to context in faces, bodies, voices, and smell," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 22(4), pages 862-868.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Barnaby J. Dixson & Jamie C. Tam & Monica Awasthy, 2013. "Do women’s preferences for men’s facial hair change with reproductive status?," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(3), pages 708-716.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:24:y:2013:i:2:p:373-379.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.