IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v23y2012i4p898-906..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How dispersal influences parent–offspring conflict over investment

Author

Listed:
  • Bram Kuijper
  • Rufus A. Johnstone

Abstract

Models that investigate family conflicts over parental investment have generally ignored population structure above the level of the family. Here, we extend conventional models to assess the impact of spatial population structure and limited dispersal on the intensity and resolution of parent–offspring conflict. Although one might naively predict that limited dispersal should reduce parent–offspring conflict, due to increased local relatedness, we show that this is not necessarily the case. Parent–offspring conflict may actually become more intense when dispersal is limited because local competition among related young can reduce the cost of any decline in maternal productivity, favoring greater selfishness on the part of the offspring. We also investigate the impact of limited dispersal on the resolution of parent–offspring conflict when the young can solicit extra resources by means of costly begging. Our model predicts that begging will be more intense when dispersal is limited but that the impact of dispersal on size then depends on the effect of parental supply on offspring demand. When greater supply leads to reduced demand, we find that parental investment should be higher in more viscous populations. By contrast, when greater supply leads to greater demand, parental investment should be lower in more viscous populations.

Suggested Citation

  • Bram Kuijper & Rufus A. Johnstone, 2012. "How dispersal influences parent–offspring conflict over investment," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(4), pages 898-906.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:23:y:2012:i:4:p:898-906.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/ars054
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Per T. Smiseth & Clare Andrews & Erica Brown & Pamela M. Prentice, 2010. "Chemical stimuli from parents trigger larval begging in burying beetles," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 21(3), pages 526-531.
    2. Ulrich K. Steiner & Anthony J. Gaston, 2005. "Reproductive consequences of natal dispersal in a highly philopatric seabird," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 16(3), pages 634-639, May.
    3. John M. McNamara & Alasdair I. Houston & Zolta´n Barta & Jose´-Luis Osorno, 2003. "Should young ever be better off with one parent than with two?," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 14(3), pages 301-310, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Steiner, Ulrich K. & Tuljapurkar, Shripad, 2020. "Drivers of diversity in individual life courses: Sensitivity of the population entropy of a Markov chain," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 159-167.
    2. Daiping Wang & Wenyuan Zhang & Shuai Yang & Xiang-Yi Li Richter, 2023. "Sex differences in avian parental care patterns vary across the breeding cycle," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.
    3. Osnat Yaniv & Uzi Motro, 2003. "ESS in Symmetric Animal Conflicts with Time Dependent Strategy Sets," Discussion Paper Series dp339, The Federmann Center for the Study of Rationality, the Hebrew University, Jerusalem, revised Jul 2004.
    4. James L. Savage & Andrew F. Russell & Rufus A. Johnstone, 2013. "Maternal costs in offspring production affect investment rules in joint rearing," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(3), pages 750-758.
    5. Arianna Passarotto & Chiara Morosinotto & Jon E Brommer & Esa Aaltonen & Kari Ahola & Teuvo Karstinen & Patrik Karell, 2022. "Cold winters have morph-specific effects on natal dispersal distance in a wild raptor," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 33(2), pages 419-427.
    6. Alfréd Trnka & Tomáš Grim, 2013. "To compensate or not to compensate: testing the negotiation model in the context of nest defense," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(1), pages 223-228.
    7. Rufus A. Johnstone & Andrea Manica & Annette L. Fayet & Mary Caswell Stoddard & Miguel A. Rodriguez-Gironés & Camilla A. Hinde, 2014. "Reciprocity and conditional cooperation between great tit parents," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(1), pages 216-222.
    8. Jessica Meade & Ki-Baek Nam & Jin-Won Lee & Ben J Hatchwell, 2011. "An Experimental Test of the Information Model for Negotiation of Biparental Care," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(5), pages 1-7, May.
    9. Tina A Barbasch & Rebecca Branconi & Robin Francis & Madison Pacaro & Maya Srinivasan & Geoffrey P Jones & Peter M Buston, 2021. "Negotiations over parental care: a test of alternative hypotheses in the clown anemonefish," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 32(6), pages 1256-1265.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:23:y:2012:i:4:p:898-906.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.