IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v33y2022i2p419-427..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cold winters have morph-specific effects on natal dispersal distance in a wild raptor

Author

Listed:
  • Arianna Passarotto
  • Chiara Morosinotto
  • Jon E Brommer
  • Esa Aaltonen
  • Kari Ahola
  • Teuvo Karstinen
  • Patrik Karell

Abstract

Dispersal is a key process with crucial implications in spatial distribution, density, and genetic structure of species’ populations. Dispersal strategies can vary according to both individual and environmental features, but putative phenotype-by-environment interactions have rarely been accounted for. Melanin-based color polymorphism is a phenotypic trait associated with specific behavioral and physiological profiles and is, therefore, a good candidate trait to study dispersal tactics in different environments. Here, using a 40 years dataset of a population of color polymorphic tawny owls (Strix aluco), we investigated natal dispersal distance of recruiting gray and pheomelanic reddish-brown (hereafter brown) color morphs in relation to post-fledging winter temperature and individual characteristics. Because morphs are differently sensitive to cold winters, we predicted that morphs’ natal dispersal distances vary according to winter conditions. Winter temperature did not affect the proportion of brown (or gray) among recruits. We found that dispersal distances correlate with winter temperature in an opposite manner in the two morphs. Although the gray morph undertakes larger movements in harsher conditions, likely because it copes better with winter severity, the brown morph disperses shorter distances when winters are harsher. We discuss this morph-specific natal dispersal pattern in the context of competition for territories between morphs and in terms of costs and benefits of these alternative strategies. Our results stress the importance of considering the interaction between phenotype and environment to fully disentangle dispersal movement patterns and provide further evidence that climate affects the behavior and local distribution of this species.

Suggested Citation

  • Arianna Passarotto & Chiara Morosinotto & Jon E Brommer & Esa Aaltonen & Kari Ahola & Teuvo Karstinen & Patrik Karell, 2022. "Cold winters have morph-specific effects on natal dispersal distance in a wild raptor," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 33(2), pages 419-427.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:33:y:2022:i:2:p:419-427.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arab149
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Juan Carlos Senar & Michael Conroy & Antoni Borras, 2002. "Asymmetric exchange between populations differing in habitat quality: A metapopulation study on the citril finch," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(1-4), pages 425-441.
    2. Svein Dale & Anne Lunde & Øyvind Steifetten, 2005. "Longer breeding dispersal than natal dispersal in the ortolan bunting," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 16(1), pages 20-24, January.
    3. Brommer, Jon E. & Fred, Marianne S., 2007. "Accounting for possible detectable distances in a comparison of dispersal: Apollo dispersal in different habitats," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 209(2), pages 407-411.
    4. Charles Francis & Pertti Saurola, 2002. "Estimating age-specific survival rates of tawny owls--recaptures versus recoveries," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(1-4), pages 637-647.
    5. Patrik Karell & Kari Ahola & Teuvo Karstinen & Jari Valkama & Jon E. Brommer, 2011. "Climate change drives microevolution in a wild bird," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 2(1), pages 1-7, September.
    6. Ulrich K. Steiner & Anthony J. Gaston, 2005. "Reproductive consequences of natal dispersal in a highly philopatric seabird," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 16(3), pages 634-639, May.
    7. Dany Garant & Loeske E.B. Kruuk & Teddy A. Wilkin & Robin H. McCleery & Ben C. Sheldon, 2005. "Evolution driven by differential dispersal within a wild bird population," Nature, Nature, vol. 433(7021), pages 60-65, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Steiner, Ulrich K. & Tuljapurkar, Shripad, 2020. "Drivers of diversity in individual life courses: Sensitivity of the population entropy of a Markov chain," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 159-167.
    2. Buzbas, Erkan Ozge & Verdu, Paul, 2018. "Inference on admixture fractions in a mechanistic model of recurrent admixture," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 149-157.
    3. Bram Kuijper & Rufus A. Johnstone, 2012. "How dispersal influences parent–offspring conflict over investment," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(4), pages 898-906.
    4. Paula H Marjamäki & Hannah L Dugdale & Deborah A Dawson & Robbie A McDonald & Richard Delahay & Terry Burke & Alastair J Wilson, 2019. "Individual variation and the source-sink group dynamics of extra-group paternity in a social mammal," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 30(2), pages 301-312.
    5. Samuel Haché & Keith A Hobson & Erin M Bayne & Steven L Van Wilgenburg & Marc-André Villard, 2014. "Tracking Natal Dispersal in a Coastal Population of a Migratory Songbird Using Feather Stable Isotope (δ2H, δ34S) Tracers," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(4), pages 1-9, April.
    6. Piou, Cyril & Prévost, Etienne, 2012. "A demo-genetic individual-based model for Atlantic salmon populations: Model structure, parameterization and sensitivity," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 231(C), pages 37-52.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:33:y:2022:i:2:p:419-427.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.