IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v23y2012i1p25-34..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Food availability and offspring demand influence sex-specific patterns and repeatability of parental provisioning

Author

Listed:
  • Matthew Low
  • Troy Makan
  • Isabel Castro

Abstract

Few studies have examined interactions between resource availability, life-history traits and sexual conflict on species-specific provisioning rates, and within-individual variation of parental care. To this end, we used 1129 nest observation periods from 118 nests across 4 populations to examine how parental nest visitation varied according to sex, food availability, and offspring need (brood size and age) in the stitchbird (hihi: Notiomystis cincta). Males increased their provisioning proportional to brood size regardless of food availability, whereas females did not increase provisioning to larger broods unless food supplemented. Male provisioning consistently followed the age-dependent energy requirements of the nestlings, whereas females showed little or no brood age–provisioning relationships. Thus, males were more sensitive than females to changes in the energy demands of their offspring; however, this was probably because females were already providing food at a high rate and could not respond to increased demand unless given additional food. Sex and habitat-specific repeatability estimates of parental effort suggest that variation in female provisioning behavior tends to be driven by differences in the local environment, whereas variation in male provisioning is more related to differences in individual quality. These sex-specific responses of parental care can be largely explained by the relative benefits of provisioning; females provisioned at a high rate to offspring they knew to be their own, based on available resources. In contrast, when food was abundant, males did not increase their provisioning to offspring probably because of the opportunity for additional matings via forced extrapair copulations.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthew Low & Troy Makan & Isabel Castro, 2012. "Food availability and offspring demand influence sex-specific patterns and repeatability of parental provisioning," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(1), pages 25-34.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:23:y:2012:i:1:p:25-34.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arr145
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sönke Eggers & Michael Griesser & Jan Ekman, 2005. "Predator-induced plasticity in nest visitation rates in the Siberian jay (Perisoreus infaustus)," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 16(1), pages 309-315, January.
    2. P. L. Schwagmeyer & Douglas W. Mock & Geoffrey A. Parker, 2002. "Biparental care in house sparrows: negotiation or sealed bid?," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 13(5), pages 713-721, September.
    3. Keith C. Hamer & Petra Quillfeldt & Juan F. Masello & Kathy L. Fletcher, 2006. "Sex differences in provisioning rules: responses of Manx shearwaters to supplementary chick feeding," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 17(1), pages 132-137, January.
    4. Matthew Low, 2006. "The energetic cost of mate guarding is correlated with territorial intrusions in the New Zealand stitchbird," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 17(2), pages 270-276, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Samuel Riou & Olivier Chastel & Keith C Hamer, 2012. "Parent–offspring conflict during the transition to independence in a pelagic seabird," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(5), pages 1102-1107.
    2. Helen R. Sofaer & T. Scott Sillett & Susana I. Peluc & Scott A. Morrison & Cameron K. Ghalambor, 2013. "Differential effects of food availability and nest predation risk on avian reproductive strategies," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(3), pages 698-707.
    3. Kaur, Rajinder Pal & Sharma, Amit & Sharma, Anuj Kumar, 2021. "Impact of fear effect on plankton-fish system dynamics incorporating zooplankton refuge," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    4. Garai, Shilpa & Pati, N.C. & Pal, Nikhil & Layek, G.C., 2022. "Organized periodic structures and coexistence of triple attractors in a predator–prey model with fear and refuge," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 165(P2).
    5. Walter D. Koenig & Eric L. Walters, 2012. "Brooding, provisioning, and compensatory care in the cooperatively breeding acorn woodpecker," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(1), pages 181-190.
    6. Kimberley J. Mathot & Josue David Arteaga-Torres & Anne Besson & Deborah M. Hawkshaw & Natasha Klappstein & Rebekah A. McKinnon & Sheeraja Sridharan & Shinichi Nakagawa, 2024. "A systematic review and meta-analysis of unimodal and multimodal predation risk assessment in birds," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    7. Alfréd Trnka & Tomáš Grim, 2013. "To compensate or not to compensate: testing the negotiation model in the context of nest defense," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(1), pages 223-228.
    8. Ariane Mutzel & Anne-Lise Olsen & Kimberley J Mathot & Yimen G Araya-Ajoy & Marion Nicolaus & Jan J Wijmenga & Jonathan Wright & Bart Kempenaers & Niels J Dingemanse, 2019. "Effects of manipulated levels of predation threat on parental provisioning and nestling begging," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 30(4), pages 1123-1135.
    9. Erol Akçay & Joan Roughgarden, 2009. "The Perfect Family: Decision Making in Biparental Care," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(10), pages 1-10, October.
    10. Tina A Barbasch & Rebecca Branconi & Robin Francis & Madison Pacaro & Maya Srinivasan & Geoffrey P Jones & Peter M Buston, 2021. "Negotiations over parental care: a test of alternative hypotheses in the clown anemonefish," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 32(6), pages 1256-1265.
    11. Kat Bebbington & Eleanor A Fairfield & Lewis G Spurgin & Sjouke A Kingma & Hannah Dugdale & Jan Komdeur & David S Richardson & Anna LindholmHandling editor, 2018. "Joint care can outweigh costs of nonkin competition in communal breeders," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 29(1), pages 169-178.
    12. Yu, Fei & Wang, Yuanshi, 2022. "Hopf bifurcation and Bautin bifurcation in a prey–predator model with prey’s fear cost and variable predator search speed," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 192-209.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:23:y:2012:i:1:p:25-34.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.