IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v17y2006i1p132-137.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sex differences in provisioning rules: responses of Manx shearwaters to supplementary chick feeding

Author

Listed:
  • Keith C. Hamer
  • Petra Quillfeldt
  • Juan F. Masello
  • Kathy L. Fletcher

Abstract

Sex differences in food provisioning have been found in a number of socially monogamous birds with biparental care, but the reasons remain unclear. In Manx shearwaters, males provide 40--50% more food for chicks than do females, and previous empirical data have suggested that this difference could arise because females are able to regulate food delivery by reducing the provisioning of well-nourished chicks, whereas males are not (hypothesis 1). Alternatively, however, males may be as capable as females of assessing and responding to the variation in the nutritional requirements of their chick but have a higher threshold for reducing food delivery to well-nourished chicks (hypothesis 2). To test these two hypotheses, we used supplementary feeding to manipulate the nutritional status of chicks and then examined the responses of male and female parents and their offspring. Supplementary feeding significantly reduced both the begging behavior of chicks and the frequency and sizes of meals delivered by parents. Males and females reduced their overall provisioning rates to a similar extent (males by 38%, females by 42%), so maintaining the same difference in contributions to provisioning in the control group (males 58%, females 42%) and the experimental treatment (males 59%, females 41%). These data strongly support hypothesis 2. Supplementary feeding of chicks resulted in fewer visits by parents and a higher proportion of long trips in both sexes (4 days for males, 5--7 days for females). However, maximum trip durations were unchanged, suggesting that supplementary feeding of chicks had no effect on the foraging ranges or overall food-provisioning strategies of parents. Copyright 2006.

Suggested Citation

  • Keith C. Hamer & Petra Quillfeldt & Juan F. Masello & Kathy L. Fletcher, 2006. "Sex differences in provisioning rules: responses of Manx shearwaters to supplementary chick feeding," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 17(1), pages 132-137, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:17:y:2006:i:1:p:132-137
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arj008
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Samuel Riou & Olivier Chastel & Keith C Hamer, 2012. "Parent–offspring conflict during the transition to independence in a pelagic seabird," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(5), pages 1102-1107.
    2. Matthew Low & Troy Makan & Isabel Castro, 2012. "Food availability and offspring demand influence sex-specific patterns and repeatability of parental provisioning," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(1), pages 25-34.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:17:y:2006:i:1:p:132-137. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.