IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v23y2012i1p181-190..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Brooding, provisioning, and compensatory care in the cooperatively breeding acorn woodpecker

Author

Listed:
  • Walter D. Koenig
  • Eric L. Walters

Abstract

We analyzed reproductive investment in parental care (brooding and the provisioning of nestlings) in the acorn woodpecker (Melanerpes formicivorus), a cooperatively breeding species in which both polygynandry and helping-at-the-nest are common. As predicted based on the strategies pursued by birds of different sex and status, breeders generally invested more in parental care than helpers, and breeder females invested more than breeder males. Contrary to expectations, however, the degree to which individuals reduced their effort with increasing group size (i.e., patterns of load lightening or compensatory care) did not match overall investment. Instead, as group size increased, there was no significant difference in compensation in either brooding or provisioning among the different categories of birds. Compensation, at least by breeders, was significantly lower during the first week of the nestling period than later on, supporting the hypothesis that compensatory reduction in care is less likely when brood reduction is more common and was not affected by the acorn crop, which had no significant effect on the incidence of brood reduction despite being important to overall reproductive success. Our results offer support for the hypothesis that levels of compensation are influenced by the relative importance of brood reduction. More theoretical work, however, will be needed in order to understand the basis for patterns of compensation among individuals of different sex and status.

Suggested Citation

  • Walter D. Koenig & Eric L. Walters, 2012. "Brooding, provisioning, and compensatory care in the cooperatively breeding acorn woodpecker," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(1), pages 181-190.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:23:y:2012:i:1:p:181-190.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arr172
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. P. L. Schwagmeyer & Douglas W. Mock & Geoffrey A. Parker, 2002. "Biparental care in house sparrows: negotiation or sealed bid?," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 13(5), pages 713-721, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alfréd Trnka & Tomáš Grim, 2013. "To compensate or not to compensate: testing the negotiation model in the context of nest defense," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(1), pages 223-228.
    2. Erol Akçay & Joan Roughgarden, 2009. "The Perfect Family: Decision Making in Biparental Care," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(10), pages 1-10, October.
    3. Tina A Barbasch & Rebecca Branconi & Robin Francis & Madison Pacaro & Maya Srinivasan & Geoffrey P Jones & Peter M Buston, 2021. "Negotiations over parental care: a test of alternative hypotheses in the clown anemonefish," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 32(6), pages 1256-1265.
    4. Kat Bebbington & Eleanor A Fairfield & Lewis G Spurgin & Sjouke A Kingma & Hannah Dugdale & Jan Komdeur & David S Richardson & Anna LindholmHandling editor, 2018. "Joint care can outweigh costs of nonkin competition in communal breeders," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 29(1), pages 169-178.
    5. Matthew Low & Troy Makan & Isabel Castro, 2012. "Food availability and offspring demand influence sex-specific patterns and repeatability of parental provisioning," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(1), pages 25-34.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:23:y:2012:i:1:p:181-190.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.