Honey bees use social information in waggle dances more fully when foraging errors are more costly
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
References listed on IDEAS
- Guillaume Rieucau & Luc-Alain Giraldeau, 2009. "Persuasive companions can be wrong: the use of misleading social information in nutmeg mannikins," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 20(6), pages 1217-1222.
- Rachel L. Kendal & Isabelle Coolen & Kevin N. Laland, 2004. "The role of conformity in foraging when personal and social information conflict," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 15(2), pages 269-277, March.
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.- Tuomo Jaakkonen & Sami M. Kivelä & Christoph M. Meier & Jukka T. Forsman, 2015. "The use and relative importance of intraspecific and interspecific social information in a bird community," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(1), pages 55-64.
- Liberman, Uri & Ram, Yoav & Altenberg, Lee & Feldman, Marcus W., 2020. "The evolution of frequency-dependent cultural transmission," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 69-81.
- Li, Zhaofeng & Jiang, Yichuan, 2014. "Friction based social force model for social foraging of sheep flock," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 273(C), pages 55-62.
- Amos Korman & Efrat Greenwald & Ofer Feinerman, 2014. "Confidence Sharing: An Economic Strategy for Efficient Information Flows in Animal Groups," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(10), pages 1-10, October.
- Laurence E A Feyten & Adam L Crane & Indar W Ramnarine & Grant E Brown, 2021. "Predation risk shapes the use of conflicting personal risk and social safety information in guppies," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 32(6), pages 1296-1305.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:23:y:2012:i:1:p:125-131.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.