IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ajagec/v86y2004i4p1117-1126.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Incorporating Generalized Marginal Budget Shares in a Mixed Demand System

Author

Listed:
  • Toshinobu Matsuda

Abstract

This article extends a Rotterdam type of mixed demand system by replacing its constant marginal budget shares with the ones derived from originally defined and specified mixed Engel curves that take a generalized functional form using the Box-Cox transformation. An empirical illustration is given for Japanese demand for fresh and processed fruits and vegetables. The results show that the Rotterdam parameterization of marginal budget shares, which corresponds to those in linear mixed Engel curves, is preferred by the data, and that improper assumptions of the form of mixed Engel curves underlying a mixed demand system can bias its elasticities. Copyright 2004, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Toshinobu Matsuda, 2004. "Incorporating Generalized Marginal Budget Shares in a Mixed Demand System," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 86(4), pages 1117-1126.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:86:y:2004:i:4:p:1117-1126
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/j.0002-9092.2004.00657.x
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hjertstrand, Per, 2022. "Nonparametric Analysis of the Mixed-Demand Model," Working Paper Series 1430, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
    2. Fujioka Soichiro & Fukushige Mototsugu, 2019. "The Future of Demand for Food Away from Home and Prepared Food: Cohort and Age Effects in Japan," Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, De Gruyter, vol. 17(1), pages 1-17, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:86:y:2004:i:4:p:1117-1126. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.