IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ajagec/v70y1988i1p142-152..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Separability Testing in Production Economics

Author

Listed:
  • Rulon D. Pope
  • Arne Hallam

Abstract

The implications of separability in production are examined using duality. Restrictions on the profit function implied by separability of the production function, and vice versa, are derived in a simple way. These restrictions are then calculated for commonly used classes of functional forms. Then the method is used to test separability of the profit function using experimental production data. The hypothesis that the profit function was separable (plant nutrients from spacing unit costs) could not be rejected. This implies that an aggregate price index for nutrients is appropriate.

Suggested Citation

  • Rulon D. Pope & Arne Hallam, 1988. "Separability Testing in Production Economics," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 70(1), pages 142-152.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:70:y:1988:i:1:p:142-152.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1241984
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shumway, C. Richard & Davis, George C., 2001. "Does consistent aggregation really matter?," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 45(2), pages 1-34.
    2. Vissa, Anuradha Akkaraju, 1991. "Three essays in demand analysis," ISU General Staff Papers 1991010108000011081, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    3. Y. Surry, 1990. "Econometric Modelling Of The European Community Compound Feed Sector: An Application To France," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(3), pages 404-421, September.
    4. Polson, Rudolph A. & Shumway, C. Richard, 1992. "Production Relationships In South Central Agriculture," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 24(2), pages 1-15, December.
    5. Hallam, Arne, 1992. "A Brief Overview Of Nonparametric Methods In Economics," Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 21(2), pages 1-15, October.
    6. Poison, Rudolph A. & Shumway, C. Richard, 1990. "Structure of South Central Agricultural Production," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(2), pages 153-163, December.
    7. Unterschultz, James R. & Jeffrey, Scott R. & Quagrainie, Kwamena K., 2000. "Value-Adding 20 Billion By 2005: Impact At The Alberta Farm Gate," Project Report Series 24049, University of Alberta, Department of Resource Economics and Environmental Sociology.
    8. Villezca-Becerra, Pedro A. & Shumway, C. Richard, 1992. "Multiple-Output Production Modeled With Three Functional Forms," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 17(1), pages 1-16, July.
    9. C. Richard Shumway, 1993. "Production economics: Worthwhile investment?," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 9(2), pages 89-108, August.
    10. Ball, V. Eldon & Moss, Charles B. & Erickson, Kenneth W. & Nehring, Richard F., 2003. "Modeling Supply Response In A Multiproduct Framework Revisited: The Nexus Of Empirics And Economics," 2003 Annual meeting, July 27-30, Montreal, Canada 21981, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    11. Aradhyula, Satheesh Venkata, 1989. "Policy structure, output supply and input demand for US crops," ISU General Staff Papers 198901010800009909, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:70:y:1988:i:1:p:142-152.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.