IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ajagec/v67y1985i2p315-319..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Carcass Merit Pricing System for the Pork Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Marvin L. Hayenga
  • Barbara S. Grisdale
  • Robert G. Kauffman
  • H. Russell Cross
  • Lauren L. Christian

Abstract

A small proportion of hogs sold to packers are priced according to their carcass value, and some producers feel that price incentives for lean hogs are inadequate. Pork carcass composition and value relationships were analyzed for a sample of 185 pork carcasses. Carcass weight, back fat thickness, and muscling index accounted for 79% of the variations in carcass value; these factors were incorporated into a standardized payoff matrix providing larger incentives for better carcasses which could be incorporated into individual packer procurement systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Marvin L. Hayenga & Barbara S. Grisdale & Robert G. Kauffman & H. Russell Cross & Lauren L. Christian, 1985. "A Carcass Merit Pricing System for the Pork Industry," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 67(2), pages 315-319.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:67:y:1985:i:2:p:315-319.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1240684
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Herrmann, Roland & Roeder, Claudia, 1998. "Some neglected issues in food demand analysis: retail-level demand, health information and product quality," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 42(4), pages 1-27.
    2. Ted C. Schroeder & John M. Jones & David A. Nichols, 1989. "Analysis of Feeder Pig Auction Price Differentials," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 11(2), pages 253-263.
    3. J. P. Voon & G. W. Edwards, 1991. "Research Payoff From Quality Improvement: The Case Of Backfat Depth In Pigs," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(1), pages 66-76, January.
    4. Manuey, Sean & Brorsen, B. Wade & Akridge, Jay T., 1991. "A Component Pricing System For Pork," 1991 Annual Meeting, August 4-7, Manhattan, Kansas 271067, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    5. Martinez, Stephen W. & Zering, Kelly D., 2004. "Pork Quality And The Role Of Market Organizaton," Agricultural Economic Reports 33973, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    6. Brorsen, B. Wade & Akridge, Jay T. & Boland, Michael A. & Mauney, Sean & Forrest, John C., 1998. "Performance Of Alternative Component Pricing Systems For Pork," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 30(2), pages 1-12, December.
    7. Meltzer, Martin I. & Kalter, Robert J., 1987. "Porcine Growth Hormone: Implications for Hog Producers and the Swine Industry," 1987 Annual Meeting, August 2-5, East Lansing, Michigan 269988, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    8. Ted C. Schroeder, 1993. "An evaluation of hog carcass merit pricing systems," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 9(4), pages 339-350.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:67:y:1985:i:2:p:315-319.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.