IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ajagec/v58y1976i4_part_1p684-692..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Productivity and Allocation of Research: U.S. Agricultural Experiment Stations

Author

Listed:
  • Maury Bredahl
  • Willis Peterson

Abstract

In this paper are presented estimates of the marginal products and internal rates of return to investment in agricultural research by commodity groups (cash grains, poultry, dairy, and livestock). The results are reported both in terms of national aggregates and on a state-by-state basis. Internal rates of return for the country as a whole range from 36% to 46%. At the state level the evidence suggests that the payoff to research is greatest for the commodities with the largest absolute value of output.

Suggested Citation

  • Maury Bredahl & Willis Peterson, 1976. "The Productivity and Allocation of Research: U.S. Agricultural Experiment Stations," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 58(4_Part_1), pages 684-692.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:58:y:1976:i:4_part_1:p:684-692.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1238811
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Thirtle, Colin, 1986. "The Production Function Approach to the Relationship Between Productivity Growth and R & D," Manchester Working Papers in Agricultural Economics 232791, University of Manchester, School of Economics, Agricultural Economics Department.
    2. Margolis, Robert M. & Kammen, Daniel M., 1999. "Evidence of under-investment in energy R&D in the United States and the impact of Federal policy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(10), pages 575-584, October.
    3. Russell, N.P. & Thirtle, C.G., 1988. "Measuring the Contribution of Publicly Funded Research and Development Expenditure to Increasing UK Oilseed Rape Yields," Manchester Working Papers in Agricultural Economics 232796, University of Manchester, School of Economics, Agricultural Economics Department.
    4. Garren, Nathan M. & White, Fred C., 1981. "An Analysis of Research Expenditures for Selected Agricultural Commodities," 1981 Annual Meeting, July 26-29, Clemson, South Carolina 279247, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    5. Lawrence Busch, 2008. "Nanotechnologies, food, and agriculture: next big thing or flash in the pan?," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 25(2), pages 215-218, June.
    6. Narrod, Clare A. & Pray, Carl E. & Tiongco, Marites, 2008. "Technology transfer, policies, and the role of the private sector in the global poultry revolution:," IFPRI discussion papers 841, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    7. Azam, Qazi Tauqir & Bloom, Erik A. & Evenson, Robert E., 1991. "Agricultural Research Productivity in Pakistan," Center Discussion Papers 321325, Yale University, Economic Growth Center.
    8. Narrod, Clare A., 2001. "Technology, Policies, And The Role Of The Private Sector In The Global Poultry Revolution," 2001: International Trade in Livestock Products Symposium, January 2001, Auckland, New Zealand 14567, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:58:y:1976:i:4_part_1:p:684-692.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.