IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ora/jrojbe/v1y2016i2p62-71.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

State-Owned, Acquisition Or Greenfield Banks In The New Eu Member States. A Post-Crisis Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Radu Alin Morutan

    (Doctoral School of Economics, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Oradea, Oradea, Romania)

  • Daniel Badulescu

    (Doctoral School of Economics, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Oradea, Oradea, Romania)

Abstract

The political and economic changes taking place at the end of the 20th century have provided Western European banks the opportunity to enter into Central and Eastern European (CEE) markets. Their entry was made either by greenfield investment or by acquisition of existing domestic banks. The motivations for the entry decision were various, e.g. managerial decisions, tightening profit margins in home markets, challengers imitation, profit-maximizations, looking for new customers in new markets, or keeping and extending relations with existing customers on the new markets where they are implanted. The expansion was amplified by the deregulation, the global capital expansion and the emergence of a single currency, throughout a period of prosperity and economic growth lasting for almost two decades (1990-2008). Until the crisis, changes in the CEE banking markets mainly concerned the increasing share of foreign capital (in market share, assets, number of branches and employees) along with the diminishing importance of state-owned banks. After 2008, the process displays new features: the restructuring of banks, mergers or strategic acquisitions, reducing operations in certain countries or even exits, adjusting the number of units and employees, improving efficiency and profitability indicators etc. Domestic banks, both private and state-owned, have bridged the gap (at least in terms of efficiency) separating them from the leaders, i.e. mostly the subsidiaries of large international banks. Apparently, greenfield banks are losing the importance they had in the preceding period (1990-2008). This paper aims at investigating the relation between foreign banks’ mode of entry into the emerging markets of CEE (i.e. acquisition vs greenfield) and the strategies’ results on those markets, before and after the crisis. Although foreign banks have implemented common strategies at group level, often dependent on the entry mode, these strategies were influenced by the specific features of the host markets and, quite frequently, by transformations occurred within home markets. We found that the entry is relevant for the development of the banks, but less than in the previous period, i.e. when banks entered the emerging markets of CEE.

Suggested Citation

  • Radu Alin Morutan & Daniel Badulescu, 2016. "State-Owned, Acquisition Or Greenfield Banks In The New Eu Member States. A Post-Crisis Analysis," Oradea Journal of Business and Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(2), pages 62-71, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:ora:jrojbe:v:1:y:2016:i:2:p:62-71
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ojbe.steconomiceuoradea.ro/volume/001-2/05.Morutan_Badulescu.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ralph De Haas, 2014. "The Dark and the Bright Side of Global Banking: A (Somewhat) Cautionary Tale from Emerging Europe," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Association for Comparative Economic Studies, vol. 56(2), pages 271-282, June.
    2. Ralph De Haas, 2014. "The dark and bright sides of global banking: a (somewhat) cautionary tale from emerging Europe," Working Papers 170, European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, Office of the Chief Economist.
    3. Ngoc-Anh Vo Thi & Dev Vencappa, 2008. "Does the Entry Mode of Foreign Banks Matter for Bank Efficiency? Evidence from the Czech Republic,Hungary, and Poland," William Davidson Institute Working Papers Series wp925, William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan.
    4. Nicoleta HURDUC & Alin NIŢU, 2011. "Forms and Strategies of the Banks to Enter on a Foreign Market," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 0(7(560)), pages 43-52, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vasile Cocris & Maria-Ramona Sarbu, 2017. "The Structural Evolution Of The Banking System In Romania Under The Impact Of Fdi," Oradea Journal of Business and Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 2(1), pages 55-62, March.
    2. MORUTAN Radu Alin & GAVRILUT Darie & BADULESCU Daniel, 2020. "The Influence Of Foreign Banks’ Entry On The Main Macroeconomic Indicators In The (Emerging) Host Economies. Case Study: Romania, Hungary And Bulgaria," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 64-78, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paul Wachtel & Iftekhar Hasan & John Bonin, 2008. "Banking in Transition Countries," Working Papers 08-22, New York University, Leonard N. Stern School of Business, Department of Economics.
    2. Hoffmann, Andreas, 2016. "The collateral effects of political integration on credit growth in the new member states of the EU," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 658-669.
    3. Chen, Minghua & Wu, Ji & Jeon, Bang Nam & Wang, Rui, 2017. "Do foreign banks take more risk? Evidence from emerging economies," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 20-39.
    4. Jarko Fidrmuc & Svatopluk Kapounek, 2020. "The Risks and Financial Vulnerability of Foreign Bank Ownership in CEECs: Evidence from Exchange Rate Depreciation after the Financial Crisis," Eastern European Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(1), pages 34-48, January.
    5. Michael A. Stemmer, 2017. "Revisiting Finance and Growth in Transition Economies - A Panel Causality Approach," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 17022, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    6. repec:zbw:bofitp:2014_008 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Huong, Pham Thu, 2022. "Foreign bank penetration in Vietnam following Vietnam’s accession to the WTO: matching expectations with reality," OSF Preprints fkhbt, Center for Open Science.
    8. Bonin, John & Hasan, Iftekhar & Wachtel, Paul, 2014. "Banking in transition countries," BOFIT Discussion Papers 8/2014, Bank of Finland Institute for Emerging Economies (BOFIT).
    9. Wu, Ji & Chen, Minghua & Jeon, Bang Nam & Wang, Rui, 2017. "Does foreign bank penetration affect the risk of domestic banks? Evidence from emerging economies," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 45-61.
    10. Yildirim, Canan & Efthyvoulou, Georgios, 2018. "Bank value and geographic diversification: regional vs global," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 225-245.
    11. Maria Arakelyan, 2018. "Foreign Banks and Credit Dynamics in CESEE," IMF Working Papers 2018/003, International Monetary Fund.
    12. Nurboja, Bashkim & Košak, Marko, 2017. "Banking efficiency in South East Europe: Evidence for financial crises and the gap between new EU members and candidate countries," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 122-138.
    13. Paul Wachtel & Iftekhar Hasan & John Bonin, 2008. "Banking in Transition Countries," Working Papers 08-22, New York University, Leonard N. Stern School of Business, Department of Economics.
    14. Benedikt Barthelmess & Jean Langlois-Berthelot, 2019. "SME Financing in MENA," Post-Print hal-03700216, HAL.
    15. Bang Nam Jeon & Maria Pia Olivero & Ji Wu, 2013. "Multinational Banking and Financial Contagion: Evidence from Foreign Bank Subsidiaries," Working Papers 052013, Hong Kong Institute for Monetary Research.
    16. Xiaohui Yuan & Jiayan Yan, 2022. "Reverse Efficiency Spillovers from Host Country Banks to Foreign Banks: Evidence from Emerging Market Bank Subsidiaries in Developed Markets," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 62(6), pages 915-946, December.
    17. Lehner, Maria, 2009. "Entry mode choice of multinational banks," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 33(10), pages 1781-1792, October.
    18. Jeon, Bang Nam & Olivero, María Pía & Wu, Ji, 2013. "Multinational banking and the international transmission of financial shocks: Evidence from foreign bank subsidiaries," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 952-972.
    19. Barthelmess Benedikt & Langlois Jean, 2020. "SME Financing in MENA: A Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of Multilateral and Bilateral Development Lenders’ Intermediated Lending Practices," Review of Middle East Economics and Finance, De Gruyter, vol. 16(3), pages 1-032, December.
    20. Caterina Giannetti & Nicola Jentzsch & Giancarlo Spagnolo, 2010. "Information Sharing and Cross-border Entry in European Banking," CEIS Research Paper 178, Tor Vergata University, CEIS, revised 21 Dec 2010.
    21. Jose L. Gallizo & Jordi Moreno & Ioana Iuliana Pop (Grigorescu), 2011. "Banking Efficiency And European Integration. Implications Of The Banking Reform In Romania," Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, Faculty of Sciences, "1 Decembrie 1918" University, Alba Iulia, vol. 2(13), pages 1-25.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    foreign banks; entry mode; CEE; EU member states; post-crisis;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
    • F36 - International Economics - - International Finance - - - Financial Aspects of Economic Integration
    • G34 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Mergers; Acquisitions; Restructuring; Corporate Governance
    • G01 - Financial Economics - - General - - - Financial Crises
    • L10 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ora:jrojbe:v:1:y:2016:i:2:p:62-71. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tomina SAVEANU (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.