IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ora/journl/v33y2024i1p345-353.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Role Of Financial Performance In Difference Of Two Manufacturer’S Brand Value

Author

Listed:
  • Alexandra SZEKERES

    (University of Debrecen, Faculty of Economics and Business, Institute of Accounting and Finance, Debrecen, Hungary)

  • Ivett BARTA

    (University of Debrecen, Faculty of Economics and Business, Institute of Accounting and Finance, Debrecen, Hungary)

  • Gergő TÖMÖRI

    (University of Debrecen, Faculty of Economics and Business, Institute of Accounting and Finance, Debrecen, Hungary)

Abstract

Brands are becoming more and more important for enterprises that spend significant amounts on building strong ones. Howewer, the value of brands and the way it should be represented in financial reports is still controversial. Our general objective is to present a calculation method able to estimate brand value that we establish for the calculation method of Interbrand corporation and results of our own survey research. Our specific objective in the course of analysis is to determine Daimler AG Mercedes-Benz’s and Nestlé cereal’s brand value based on data of 2022. Firstly we calculated the so-called Economic Value of researched enterprises by analysing their financial reports. Applying the results from our survey research we determined the role of brand plays in gaining EVA, which is Brand Income. Finally we calculated a ratio using WACC which we discounted the Brand Income with we obtained the Brand Value. Our survey research is assembled according to Keller’s Brand Equity Model. During our research we have confirmed our hypothesis that people filling the survey consider brand to be a more important purchasing aspect in case of Mercedes-Benz than Nestlé cereals; purchasing Nestlé cereals respondents consider brand as the most important purchasing aspect out of the given list; respondents choose analysed brands contra unknown ones which has the same features and price. Final results show that Mercedes-Benz and Nestlé cereals have strong brand knowledge, the Mercedes brand value was several times higher, while the difference between these brand values caused by not the different financial performance but rather the devation of brand power and strength of the analysed manifacture companies.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexandra SZEKERES & Ivett BARTA & Gergő TÖMÖRI, 2024. "The Role Of Financial Performance In Difference Of Two Manufacturer’S Brand Value," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 33(1), pages 345-353, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:33:y:2024:i:1:p:345-353
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://anale.steconomiceuoradea.ro/en/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/AUOES.July_.2024.35.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. He, Junnan & Calder, Bobby J., 2020. "The experimental evaluation of brand strength and brand value," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 194-202.
    2. Singfat Chu & Hean Keh, 2006. "Brand value creation: Analysis of the Interbrand-Business Week brand value rankings," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 323-331, December.
    3. Ron N. Borkovsky & Avi Goldfarb & Avery M. Haviv & Sridhar Moorthy, 2017. "Measuring and Understanding Brand Value in a Dynamic Model of Brand Management," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(4), pages 471-499, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zsolt Sándor & Attila Szőcs & Matthijs R. Wildenbeest, 2024. "The impact of brand equity on profit premium in an equilibrium framework," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 35(3), pages 423-438, September.
    2. Angulo-Ruiz, Fernando & Pergelova, Albena & Cheben, Juraj & Angulo-Altamirano, Eladio, 2016. "A cross-country study of marketing effectiveness in high-credence services," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 3636-3644.
    3. Chih-Yang Tseng, 2020. "Family firms and long-term orientation of SG&A expenditures," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 55(4), pages 1181-1206, November.
    4. T. Tony Ke & Jiwoong Shin & Jungju Yu, 2023. "A Model of Product Portfolio Design: Guiding Consumer Search Through Brand Positioning," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(6), pages 1101-1124, November.
    5. David Wang & Tiffany Yu & Fang-Ru Ye, 2012. "The value relevance of brand equity in the financial services industry: an empirical analysis using quantile regression," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 6(4), pages 459-471, December.
    6. Brett Hollenbeck, 2020. "Horizontal mergers and innovation in concentrated industries," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 1-37, March.
    7. Jalal Hanaysha, 2016. "The Importance of Product Innovation in Driving Brand Success: An Empirical Study on Automotive Industry," American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, Science Publications, vol. 8(1), pages 35-43, March.
    8. Dirk Crass & Dirk Czarnitzki & Andrew A. Toole, 2019. "The Dynamic Relationship Between Investments in Brand Equity and Firm Profitability: Evidence Using Trademark Registrations," International Journal of the Economics of Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1), pages 157-176, January.
    9. Lang, Le Dang & Lim, Weng Marc & Guzmán, Francisco, 2022. "How does promotion mix affect brand equity? Insights from a mixed-methods study of low involvement products," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 175-190.
    10. Xuan Gong & Yunchan Zhu & Rizwan Ali & Ruijin Guo, 2019. "Capturing Associations and Sustainable Competitiveness of Brands from Social Tags," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-20, March.
    11. Torres, Anna & Bijmolt, Tammo H.A. & Tribó, Josep A. & Verhoef, Peter, 2012. "Generating global brand equity through corporate social responsibility to key stakeholders," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 13-24.
    12. Joonho Shin & Xavier Mendoza & Changbum Choi, 2022. "Do internationalizing business group affiliates perform better after promarket reforms? Evidence from Korean SMEs," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 39(2), pages 805-841, June.
    13. Bart J. Bronnenberg & Jean-Pierre Dubé & Chad Syverson, 2022. "Marketing Investment and Intangible Brand Capital," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 36(3), pages 53-74, Summer.
    14. Kuntner, Tobias, 2017. "Price promotions and brand equity: the role of brand types," EconStor Preprints 157296, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    15. Qiong Yao & Liwen Huang & Mingli Li, 2019. "The effects of tech and non-tech innovation on brand equity in China: The role of institutional environments," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(5), pages 1-24, May.
    16. Ron N. Borkovsky, 2017. "The timing of version releases: A dynamic duopoly model," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 187-239, September.
    17. Hauke A. Wetzel & Stefan Hattula & Maik Hammerschmidt & Harald J. Heerde, 2018. "Building and leveraging sports brands: evidence from 50 years of German professional soccer," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 46(4), pages 591-611, July.
    18. Aravind Reghunathan, 2021. "Branding of Government Services: Benefits and Challenges," IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, , vol. 10(2), pages 232-235, July.
    19. Yao, Yao (Alex) & Yang, Sha & Sudhir, K., 2024. "Separating substitution and psychological effects of price with a two-step conjoint approach: Application to luxury goods," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 344-361.
    20. Bilal Gerekan & Abdulkadir Pehlivan & Mahmut Kocan, 2019. "The Effect of Firm Growth on Brand Value: Evidence from Brand Finance Turkey-100," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 9(9), pages 1067-1076, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    brand value; IFRS; Interbrand model; manufacturing companies;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing
    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:33:y:2024:i:1:p:345-353. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin ZMOLE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.