IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ora/journl/v1y2017i1p247-258.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis Of Conceptual And Technical (In)Consistencies In The Ifrs 16 Leases Accounting Model

Author

Listed:
  • Bunea Stefan

    (The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania The Faculty of Accounting and Management Information Systems)

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to identify a set of viable arguments for a critical analysis of the new standard in terms of the needs of users of financial statements, but also to clarify a number of conceptual and technical issues that we will have to take into account in the future, while implementing it. IFRS 16 solves the conceptual dilemmas for the lessee, but not for the lessor. It is obviously an unfinished project which requires further conceptual clarification along with consistent and less expensive technical solutions. We have seen that preparers are rather willing to accept conceptually unsubstantiated solutions if they bring cost savings. They are blaming IASB for taking no account of the different business models which, in their opinion, account for the fact that not all lease contracts are financing for the lessee (a dual model would be more appropriate). Unlike them, auditors, academics, and EFRAG consider it absolutely necessary that IASB solutions should be in accordance with the international conceptual framework and that both the lessee and the lessor should apply a single accounting model based on the right-of-use asset theory.

Suggested Citation

  • Bunea Stefan, 2017. "Analysis Of Conceptual And Technical (In)Consistencies In The Ifrs 16 Leases Accounting Model," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 247-258, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2017:i:1:p:247-258
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://anale.steconomiceuoradea.ro/volume/2017/n1/23.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rolf Uwe Fülbier & Jorge Lirio Silva & Marc Henrik Pferdehirt, 2008. "Impact of Lease Capitalization on Financial Ratios of Listed German Companies," Schmalenbach Business Review (sbr), LMU Munich School of Management, vol. 60(2), pages 122-144, April.
    2. Norman, Carolyn Strand & Rose, Jacob M. & Suh, Ik Seon, 2011. "The effects of disclosure type and audit committee expertise on Chief Audit Executives' tolerance for financial misstatements," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 102-108, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Białek-Jaworska Anna & Dobroszek Justyna & Szatkowska Paulina, 2022. "Does the IFRS 16 affect the key ratios of listed companies? Evidence from Poland," International Journal of Management and Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy, vol. 58(3), pages 299-315, September.
    2. Kusano, Masaki, 2018. "Effect of capitalizing operating leases on credit ratings: Evidence from Japan," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 45-56.
    3. Tommaso Fabi & Enrico Laghi & Marco Mattei & Alessandro Sura, 2014. "Comparing the effects of IASB Proposal on leasing: an impact assessment of EU listed Companies," FINANCIAL REPORTING, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(2-3-4), pages 17-57.
    4. Jennergren, L. Peter, 2011. "Firm Valuation with Operating Leases," SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Business Administration 2011:3, Stockholm School of Economics, revised 30 May 2011.
    5. Fanning, Kirsten & David Piercey, M., 2014. "Internal auditors’ use of interpersonal likability, arguments, and accounting information in a corporate governance setting," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 39(8), pages 575-589.
    6. Kusano, Masaki & Sakuma, Yoshihiro & Tsunogaya, Noriyuki, 2016. "Economic consequences of changes in the lease accounting standard: Evidence from Japan," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 73-88.
    7. Mahfuja Malik, 2014. "Audit committee composition and effectiveness: a review of post-SOX literature," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 81-117, October.
    8. Rustam, Sehrish & Rashid, Kashif & Zaman, Khalid, 2013. "The relationship between audit committees, compensation incentives and corporate audit fees in Pakistan," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 697-716.
    9. Elisabetta Barone & Jacqueline Birt & Soledad Moya, 2014. "Lease Accounting: A Review of Recent Literature," Accounting in Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 35-54, June.
    10. Diamant, Olga, 2010. "Leasing und bilanzpolitische Motive," Leasing - Wissenschaft & Praxis, Universität zu Köln, Forschungsinstitut für Leasing, vol. 8(2), pages 7-32.
    11. Fitó, M. Àngels & Moya, Soledad & Orgaz, Neus, 2013. "The debate on rented assets capitalization: The economic impact on family firms," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 4(4), pages 260-269.
    12. Madher E. Hamdallah & Salem Al-N’eimat & Anan F. Srouji & Manaf Al-Okaily & Khaldoon Albitar, 2022. "The Effect of Apparent and Intellectual Sustainability Independence on the Credibility Gap of the Accounting Information," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-22, November.
    13. Gullkvist, Benita & Jokipii, Annukka, 2013. "Perceived importance of red flags across fraud types," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 44-61.
    14. Ikseon Suh & Adi Masli & John T. Sweeney, 2021. "Do Management Training Grounds Reduce Internal Auditor Objectivity and External Auditor Reliance? The Influence of Family Firms," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 173(1), pages 205-227, September.
    15. Molina Sánchez, Horacio & Mora Enguídanos, Araceli, 2015. "Cambios conceptuales en la contabilidad de los arrendamientos: retos normativos y académicos," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 99-113.
    16. Pavel Huňáček & Ondřej Jíša, 2021. "The impact of IFRS 16 on EV/EBITDA and business valuation [Vliv implementace účetního standardu IFRS 16 na výši ukazatele EV/EBITDA a ocenění podniku]," Oceňování, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 14(1), pages 34-46.
    17. Ola Mohammad Khersiat, 2020. "The Impact of the Adoption of IFRS 16 on Accounting Conservatism in Airlines: The Case of Royal Airlines of Jordan," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(3), pages 589-601.
    18. So-Jin Yu & Jin-Sung Rha, 2021. "Research Trends in Accounting Fraud Using Network Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-26, May.
    19. Sylvain Durocher & Anne Fortin, 2009. "Proposed Changes in Lease Accounting and Private Business Bankers' Credit Decisions," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(1), pages 9-42, February.
    20. Barral Rivada, Antonio & Cordobés Madueño, Magdalena & Ramírez Sobrino, Jesús N., 2014. "Los arrendamientos operativos: impacto de su reconocimiento en los estados financieros y en la política de financiación de las compañías españolas y del Reino Unido," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 212-223.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    lease; right-of-use asset theory; off-balance sheet financing; lease capitalisation; discount rate;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2017:i:1:p:247-258. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin ZMOLE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.