IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ora/journl/v1y2015i2p710-719.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Loan Market And The Regulation In The Context Of Globalization

Author

Listed:
  • Anca Bara (Mitu)

    (National Institute for Economic Research ”Costin C. Kiritescu” Romanian Academy, Bucharest, Romania,)

  • Robert-Claudiu Hellvig

    (Doctoral School in Economics, University of Oradea, Oradea, Romania,)

  • Constantin–Adrian Blanaru

    (Associate proffesor at University “Petre Andrei” of Iași,Iași, Romania,)

Abstract

Lending is part of everyday life, and this is why it must be supported by the deciding factors, but not under any terms. We can hardly imagine an economy that does not include the lending activity in its mechanisms. Lending is a fundamental element for the fluidization of monetary circuits, but its effects are not always positive. From this point of view, the present analysis tries to highlight a number of issues underlying the functioning of modern economies, issues that have harmful effects on the general welfare. Along with the recent economic crisis, economists’ debates on the culprits were amplified, increasingly discussing about its real causes, the modernization developments always confronting us with new paradigms, including that of the regulation of the modern banking system. Starting initially as a means of temporary redistribution of available resources lending also acquired slavery accents as it is sometimes promoted among final consumers, the interest of banking institutions being just the growth of banking performances and therefore of the bank profit. We do not dispute its necessity, especially in times when the amount of currency on the market is much lower, but we cannot but agree with the excesses that financial institutions register in the creditor - debtor relation by means of unfair terms, interest rates sometimes exorbitant and recovery policies which lie at the limit of legality. All these practices unfortunately are ignored by those who should oversee the credit market. People speak of deregulation or over-regulation. We believe that the regulations are welcome, but only when they protect all parties involved, not just certain interests. A market of this kind, involving substantial financial gain is a market that attracts such excesses. The role of the regulators must be precisely to ensure that such agreements are concluded and take place in humane, fair and lawful conditions for all those involved.The experiences of recent years show that regulators have responded to the financial market abuses just after they exploded. It is important for the supervision to prevent and drain everything that is harmful.

Suggested Citation

  • Anca Bara (Mitu) & Robert-Claudiu Hellvig & Constantin–Adrian Blanaru, 2015. "Loan Market And The Regulation In The Context Of Globalization," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(2), pages 710-719, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2015:i:2:p:710-719
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://anale.steconomiceuoradea.ro/volume/2015/n2/085.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carmen M. Reinhart & Kenneth S. Rogoff, 2009. "Varieties of Crises and Their Dates," Introductory Chapters, in: This Time Is Different: Eight Centuries of Financial Folly, Princeton University Press.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dani Rodrik, 2018. "Populism and the economics of globalization," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 1(1), pages 12-33, June.
    2. Daisuke Ikeda & Toan Phan & Timothy Sablik, 2020. "Asset Bubbles and Global Imbalances," Richmond Fed Economic Brief, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, vol. 20, pages 1-4, January.
    3. Carmen M. Reinhart & Kenneth S. Rogoff, 2014. "Recovery from Financial Crises: Evidence from 100 Episodes," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 104(5), pages 50-55, May.
    4. Scott E. Page, 2012. "A complexity perspective on institutional design," Politics, Philosophy & Economics, , vol. 11(1), pages 5-25, February.
    5. Steven J. Davis & John C. Haltiwanger & Kyle Handley & Ben Lipsius & Josh Lerner & Javier Miranda, 2021. "The economic effects of private equity buyouts," Jena Economics Research Papers 2021-013, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
    6. Michael Redmond & Willem Van Zandweghe, 2016. "The Lasting Damage from the Financial Crisis to U.S. Productivity," Macro Bulletin, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, pages 1-3, March.
    7. Manuel Funke & Moritz Schularick & Christoph Trebesch, 2023. "Populist Leaders and the Economy," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 113(12), pages 3249-3288, December.
    8. Roos, Michael W. M., 2015. "The macroeconomics of radical uncertainty," Ruhr Economic Papers 592, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    9. Christoph Trebesch, 2019. "Resolving sovereign debt crises: the role of political risk," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 71(2), pages 421-444.
    10. Pogany, Peter, 2013. "Thermodynamic Isolation and the New World Order," MPRA Paper 49924, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Prabheesh, K.P. & Anglingkusumo, Reza & Juhro, Solikin M., 2021. "The dynamics of global financial cycle and domestic economic cycles: Evidence from India and Indonesia," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 831-842.
    12. Röhrs, Sigrid & Winter, Christoph, 2017. "Reducing government debt in the presence of inequality," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 1-20.
    13. İbrahim Özmen & Mihai Mutascu, 2024. "Public Debt and Growth: New Insights," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(2), pages 8706-8736, June.
    14. Thanh C. Nguyen & Vítor Castro & Justine Wood, 2022. "Political environment and financial crises," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(1), pages 417-438, January.
    15. Till Treeck, 2014. "Did Inequality Cause The U.S. Financial Crisis?," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(3), pages 421-448, July.
    16. Janice Boucher Breuer & John McDermott, 2019. "Debt And Depression," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 37(4), pages 714-730, October.
    17. Reischmann, Markus, 2016. "Creative accounting and electoral motives: Evidence from OECD countries," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 243-257.
    18. Jonathan Donier & Jean-Philippe Bouchaud, 2015. "Why Do Markets Crash? Bitcoin Data Offers Unprecedented Insights," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(10), pages 1-11, October.
    19. Javier Bianchi & Enrique G. Mendoza, 2018. "Optimal Time-Consistent Macroprudential Policy," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 126(2), pages 588-634.
    20. Stijn Claessens & M. Ayhan Kose, 2013. "Financial Crises: Explanations, Types and Implications," CAMA Working Papers 2013-06, Centre for Applied Macroeconomic Analysis, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    financial globalization; regulation; deregulation; credit; financial intermediation; financial markets;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G18 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • G01 - Financial Economics - - General - - - Financial Crises
    • E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2015:i:2:p:710-719. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin ZMOLE The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Catalin ZMOLE to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.