IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ora/journl/v1y2012i1p1193-1199.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigating The Relationship Between Perceived Sacrifice And B To B Customer Satisfaction In The Insurance Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Petrisoaia Carmen

    (Academia de Studii Economice, Bucuresti, Scoala Doctorala de Marketing)

  • Nicolae Al. Pop

    (Academia de Studii Economice Bucuresti, Departamentul de Marketing)

Abstract

The Romanian insurance market expanded rapidly during the last two decades. Presently, the Insurance Supervisory Commission (CSA) reports 43 insurance companies and 567 insurance brokers. In this extremely dynamic and competitive environment, it is compulsory to control key elements that generate and maintain customer satisfaction. Therefore, the hereto paper concentrates on the influence exerted by perceived sacrifice over the business to business customer satisfaction in the insurance industry. More precisely, the objective is to investigate the impact of effort, time and money spent by the business to business customer over satisfaction. The concept of satisfaction has been intensively explored in the literature due to the fact that both practitioners and academics understood that it held a great significance in determining and preserving customer relationships and therefore, long-term profitability. In the service sector, much research has been conducted in the business to consumer context, especially concentrated on the relationship between service quality and satisfaction, whereas the business to business setting received less attention. In order to explore the relationship between perceived sacrifice and satisfaction, a descriptive research design was used. A questionnaire was created using multiple items for measuring satisfaction and perceived sacrifice and also a number of identification variables. The survey concerned companies that had had benefitted from the services of an insurance broker at least once. Copies of the questionnaire were sent by email to company managers from all the main industries. A total of 85 answers were collected. With the help of SPSS tool, the two measurement scales were tested for reliability and validity and a factor analysis was performed. The next step was to calculate the composite scores for each of the two variables and to carry out the simple linear regression analysis. Our linear model considers that perceived sacrifice is the independent variable, whereas satisfaction is the dependant one. The calculated R2 indicated that perceived sacrifice explained 25% of satisfactionâ€(tm)s variation. We also carried out a multiple linear regression in order to investigate the impact of each of the three components and we found that unlike price and time, effort doesnâ€(tm)t have an influence on satisfaction. The results obtained allow a better understanding of the relationship between perceived sacrifice and satisfaction making management decisions more effective.

Suggested Citation

  • Petrisoaia Carmen & Nicolae Al. Pop, 2012. "Investigating The Relationship Between Perceived Sacrifice And B To B Customer Satisfaction In The Insurance Industry," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 1193-1199, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2012:i:1:p:1193-1199
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://anale.steconomiceuoradea.ro/volume/2012/n1/176.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lapierre, Jozee & Filiatrault, Pierre & Chebat, Jean-Charles, 1999. "Value Strategy Rather Than Quality Strategy: A Case of Business-to-Business Professional Services," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 235-246, June.
    2. Chen, Ching-Fu, 2008. "Investigating structural relationships between service quality, perceived value, satisfaction, and behavioral intentions for air passengers: Evidence from Taiwan," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 42(4), pages 709-717, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sarker, Rumana Islam & Kaplan, Sigal & Mailer, Markus & Timmermans, Harry J.P., 2019. "Applying affective event theory to explain transit users’ reactions to service disruptions," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 593-605.
    2. Yuhan Ge & Qing Yuan & Yaxi Wang & Keunsoo Park, 2021. "The Structural Relationship among Perceived Service Quality, Perceived Value, and Customer Satisfaction-Focused on Starbucks Reserve Coffee Shops in Shanghai, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-19, August.
    3. Behzad MOHAMMADIAN & Corina MARINESCU, 2023. "Gamification Effectiveness In Tourism Industry: Evidence From Human Resource Process Tracing," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 17(1), pages 664-677, November.
    4. Bezerra, George Christian Linhares & Gomes, Carlos F., 2016. "Measuring airport service quality: A multidimensional approach," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 85-93.
    5. Songhong Chen & Jian Ming Luo, 2023. "Understand Delegates Risk Attitudes and Behaviour: The Moderating Effect of Trust in COVID-19 Vaccination," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-18, February.
    6. Lee, Misuk & Khelifa, Alexandre & Garrow, Laurie A. & Bierlaire, Michel & Post, David, 2012. "An analysis of destination choice for opaque airline products using multidimensional binary logit models," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(10), pages 1641-1653.
    7. Chen, Lu & Li, Yong-Quan & Liu, Chih-Hsing, 2019. "How airline service quality determines the quantity of repurchase intention - Mediate and moderate effects of brand quality and perceived value," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 185-197.
    8. Ko, Young Dae & Kwag, Sung Il & Oh, Yonghui, 2020. "An efficient airline seat reallocation algorithm considering customer dissatisfaction," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    9. Nguyen-Phuoc, Duy Quy & Vo, Nguyen S. & Su, Diep Ngoc & Nguyen, Vinh Hoang & Oviedo-Trespalacios, Oscar, 2021. "What makes passengers continue using and talking positively about ride-hailing services? The role of the booking app and post-booking service quality," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 367-384.
    10. Chandan A. Chavadi & Sindhu R. Menon & Monika Sirothiya, 2019. "Measuring Service Quality Perceptions of Indian E-retailers: An Evaluative Study," Metamorphosis: A Journal of Management Research, , vol. 18(2), pages 92-102, December.
    11. Machado-León, José Luis & de Oña, Rocío & de Oña, Juan, 2016. "The role of involvement in regards to public transit riders' perceptions of the service," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 34-44.
    12. de Oña, Juan, 2020. "The role of involvement with public transport in the relationship between service quality, satisfaction and behavioral intentions," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 296-318.
    13. Guo, Chiquan & Wang, Yong J. & Metcalf, Ashley, 2014. "How to calibrate conventional market-oriented organizational culture in 21st century production-centered firms? A customer relationship perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 235-245.
    14. Hsu, Chia-Jui & Yen, Jin-Ru & Chang, Yu-Chun & Woon, Hui Kee, 2016. "How do the services of low cost carriers affect passengers' behavioral intentions to revisit a destination?," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 111-116.
    15. Jiechao Zhang & Xuedong Yan & Meiwu An & Li Sun, 2017. "The Impact of Beijing Subway’s New Fare Policy on Riders’ Attitude, Travel Pattern and Demand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-21, April.
    16. Quy Nguyen-Phuoc, Duy & Nguyen, Teron & Ngoc Su, Diep & Thi Le, Phuong & Oviedo-Trespalacios, Oscar, 2022. "How do social cues from other passengers affect word-of-mouth and intention to continue using bus services? A second-order SEM approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 302-320.
    17. Jun Hwan Kim & Hyun Cheol Lee, 2019. "Understanding the Repurchase Intention of Premium Economy Passengers Using an Extended Theory of Planned Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-19, June.
    18. Juan de Oña & Rocio de Oña, 2015. "Quality of Service in Public Transport Based on Customer Satisfaction Surveys: A Review and Assessment of Methodological Approaches," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(3), pages 605-622, August.
    19. Abid Hussain & Mingxing Li & Shahida Kanwel & Muhammad Asif & Arif Jameel & Jinsoo Hwang, 2023. "Impact of Tourism Satisfaction and Service Quality on Destination Loyalty: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach concerning China Resort Hotels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-15, May.
    20. Lucini, Filipe R. & Tonetto, Leandro M. & Fogliatto, Flavio S. & Anzanello, Michel J., 2020. "Text mining approach to explore dimensions of airline customer satisfaction using online customer reviews," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    satisfaction; perceived sacrifice; services; business to business; insurance broker;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing
    • M39 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2012:i:1:p:1193-1199. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin ZMOLE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.