IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nwe/eajour/y2018i2p250-266.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rural Technology Park – A New Inclusive Rural Development Concept for the Reduction of Poverty in Rural Afghanistan

Author

Listed:
  • Sayed Nasrat
  • S Fakhrudin Sadat
  • Hidayatullah Sapi

Abstract

This paper explores the Rural Technology Park (RTP) as a new inclusive rural development concept for the reduction of poverty in rural Afghanistan. The analysis of this paper is based on literature review, interviews, focus group discussions and field observations. The primary data were collected between 2010 and mid-2017 from 9 out of 34 provinces in Afghanistan. Despite the efforts of the donor community and the Government of Afghanistan, rural poverty is on the rise in the country. Afghanistan is an agrarian country and most rural people have access to varying resources in their locality. However, they do not have adequate knowledge, skills, appropriate and affordable rural technologies, access to finance and markets to better use the available resources. Therefore, in 2009 the concept of the RTP was launched by the Ministry of Rural Rehabilitation and Development (MRRD) to contribute to poverty reduction. The RTP works in the sectors of Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) development, renewable energy, water supply and sanitation, and rural housing. Yet rigorous, substantial and timely support has not been given to the RTP by the MRRD and its key stakeholders. This paper finds that the RTP as a multi-functional concept is crucial in contributing to poverty reduction in rural Afghanistan. It equips poor rural people to come out of poverty and have endogenous development, social capital, and Community-Based Enterprise (CBE) development elements as its key features.

Suggested Citation

  • Sayed Nasrat & S Fakhrudin Sadat & Hidayatullah Sapi, 2018. "Rural Technology Park – A New Inclusive Rural Development Concept for the Reduction of Poverty in Rural Afghanistan," Economic Alternatives, University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria, issue 2, pages 250-266, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:nwe:eajour:y:2018:i:2:p:250-266
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.unwe.bg/uploads/Alternatives/Sayed_EAlternativi_2_2018-8.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Galey Tenzin & Kozo Otsuka & Kaoru Natsuda, 2015. "Can Social Capital Reduce Poverty? A Study of Rural Households in Eastern Bhutan," Asian Economic Journal, East Asian Economic Association, vol. 29(3), pages 243-264, September.
    2. Carmen Camarero Izquierdo & Carlos Hernández Carrión & Sonia San Martín Gutiérrez, 2008. "Developing relationships within the framework of local economic development in Spain," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 41-65, January.
    3. Narayan, Deepa & Pritchett, Lant, 1999. "Cents and Sociability: Household Income and Social Capital in Rural Tanzania," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 47(4), pages 871-897, July.
    4. Maria Costanza Torri, 2009. "Community Entrepreneurship Among Lower Castes In India: A Grassroots Contribution Towards Poverty Alleviation And Rural Development Under Conditions Of Adversity And Environmental Uncertainty," Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship (JDE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(04), pages 413-432.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Md. Shahidul Islam & Khurshed Alam, 2018. "Does social capital reduce poverty? A cross-sectional study of rural household in Bangladesh," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 45(11), pages 1515-1532, August.
    2. Mogues, Tewodaj & Carter, Michael R., 2003. "Social Capital and Incentive Compatibility: Modelling the Accumulation and Use of Social Collateral," Staff Paper Series 460, University of Wisconsin, Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    3. Levien, Michael, 2015. "Social Capital as Obstacle to Development: Brokering Land, Norms, and Trust in Rural India," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 77-92.
    4. Jan Fałkowski & Maciej Jakubowski & Paweł Strawiński, 2014. "Returns from income strategies in rural Poland," The Economics of Transition, The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, vol. 22(1), pages 139-178, January.
    5. Antonio Bubbico, 2013. "Administrative Continuity: Enhancer or Constraint for Regional Governments' Efficiency?," ERSA conference papers ersa13p493, European Regional Science Association.
    6. Arturo Galindo & Alberto Chong & César Calderón, 2001. "Structure and Development of Financial Institutions and Links with Trust: Cross-Country Evidence," Research Department Publications 4251, Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department.
    7. Munasib, Abdul B.A. & Jordan, Jeffrey L., 2011. "The Effect of Social Capital on the Choice to Use Sustainable Agricultural Practices," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 43(2), pages 1-15, May.
    8. Munshi Sulaiman & Mehnaz Rabbani & Vivek A. Prakash, 2010. "Impact Assessment of CFPR/TUP: A Descriptive Analysis Based on 2002-2005 Panel Data," Working Papers id:2567, eSocialSciences.
    9. Renate Strobl & Conny Wunsch, 2021. "Risky choices and solidarity: disentangling different behavioural channels," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 24(4), pages 1185-1214, December.
    10. Gabre-Madhin, Eleni Z., 2001. "Market institutions, transaction costs, and social capital in the Ethiopian grain market:," Research reports 124, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    11. A. Arrighetti & G. Seravalli & G. Wolleb, 2001. "Social Capital, Institutions and Collective Action Between Firms," Economics Department Working Papers 2001-EP08, Department of Economics, Parma University (Italy).
    12. Giuseppina Guagnano & Elisabetta Santarelli & Isabella Santini, 2016. "Can Social Capital Affect Subjective Poverty in Europe? An Empirical Analysis Based on a Generalized Ordered Logit Model," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 128(2), pages 881-907, September.
    13. Pargal, Sheoli & Gilligan, Daniel & Huq, Mainul, 2000. "Private provision of a public good - social capital and solid waste management in Dhaka, Bangladesh," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2422, The World Bank.
    14. Konstantinos Matakos & Dimitrios Minos & Ari Perdana & Elizabeth Radin, 2022. "“Dragon boating” alone? Community ties and systemic income shocks," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(1), pages 55-81, January.
    15. Luc Moers, 2000. "Determinants of Enterprise Restructuring in Transition: Description of a Survey in Russian Industry," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(3), pages 307-335.
    16. Takeshi Aida, 2019. "Social capital as an instrument for common pool resource management: a case study of irrigation management in Sri Lanka," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 71(4), pages 952-978.
    17. Thang T. Vo, 2018. "Social capital and household vulnerability: New evidence from rural Vienam," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2018-167, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    18. Shannon Rogers & Semra Aytur & Kevin Gardner & Cynthia Carlson, 2012. "Measuring community sustainability: exploring the intersection of the built environment & social capital with a participatory case study," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 2(2), pages 143-153, June.
    19. Grootaert, Christiaan, 1999. "Social capital, houshold welfare, and poverty in Indonesia," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2148, The World Bank.
    20. Maarten Voors & Eleonora Nillesen & Philip Verwimp & Erwin Bulte & Robert Lensink & Daan van Soest, 2010. "Does Conflict affect Preferences? Results from Field Experiments in Burundi," HiCN Working Papers 71, Households in Conflict Network.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nwe:eajour:y:2018:i:2:p:250-266. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Vanya Lazarova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/unweebg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.