IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nwe/eajour/y2014i4p22-34.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Feasibility Study on the Logistic Competitiveness of Commercial Seaports in Southern Baltic Sea Region

Author

Listed:
  • Ryszard K. Miler

    (Gdansk Banking School, Gdansk, Poland)

  • Bohdan Pac

    (Gdansk Banking School, Gdansk, Poland)

  • Werner Gronau

    (Stralsund University of Applied Sciences, School of Business, Stralsund 18435, Germany)

  • John Breslin

    (Gdansk Banking School, Gdansk, Poland)

Abstract

This paper describes a feasibility study designed to determine the competitiveness of a seaport. The content presents a wholly unique approach to the examination and evaluation of the seaport competitiveness level based on the multi-criteria assessment model of their unique logistical characteristics. The research area is limited to the selected seaports located in the Southern BSR. This is the first stage of an international research programme using multi criteria logistics capabilities analysis combined with an adaptation of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method for seaports competition level assessment. The paper also identifies unique criteria, sub-criteria and evaluated diagnostic features (parts of the logistic capabilities chart) of selected Southern Baltic Sea ports facilities taken from an analysis of the main processes and commercial profiles in the seaports of Gdansk, Gdynia, Szczecin and Swinoujscie (Poland) and Rostock, Lubeck (Germany). A specific decisionmaking model for practical assessment of the hypothesised seaport logistics potential has been proposed as well as a group of speculative ventures designed to verify the proposed solutions in subsequent field research.

Suggested Citation

  • Ryszard K. Miler & Bohdan Pac & Werner Gronau & John Breslin, 2014. "Feasibility Study on the Logistic Competitiveness of Commercial Seaports in Southern Baltic Sea Region," Economic Alternatives, University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria, issue 4, pages 22-34, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:nwe:eajour:y:2014:i:4:p:22-34
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.unwe.bg/uploads/Alternatives/3_Miler_Pac_Gronau_Breslin.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tongzon, Jose, 2001. "Efficiency measurement of selected Australian and other international ports using data envelopment analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 107-122, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Figueiredo De Oliveira, Gabriel & Cariou, Pierre, 2015. "The impact of competition on container port (in)efficiency," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 124-133.
    2. Carlos Pestana Barros & Zhongfei Chen & Peter Wanke, 2016. "Efficiency in Chinese seaports: 2002–2012," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 18(3), pages 295-316, September.
    3. George E. Halkos & Nickolaos G. Tzeremes, 2015. "Measuring Seaports' Productivity: A Malmquist Productivity Index Decomposition Approach," Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, University of Bath, vol. 49(2), pages 355-376, April.
    4. Quintano, Claudio & Mazzocchi, Paolo & Rocca, Antonella, 2021. "Evaluation of the eco-efficiency of territorial districts with seaport economic activities," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    5. Renata Machado de Andrade & Suhyung Lee & Paul Tae-Woo Lee & Oh Kyoung Kwon & Hye Min Chung, 2019. "Port Efficiency Incorporating Service Measurement Variables by the BiO-MCDEA: Brazilian Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-18, August.
    6. Talley, Wayne K., 2006. "Chapter 22 Port Performance: An Economics Perspective," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 499-516, January.
    7. Chiou, Yu-Chiun & Lan, Lawrence W. & Yen, Barbara T.H., 2012. "Route-based data envelopment analysis models," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 415-425.
    8. Angela Stefania Bergantino & Enrico Musso, 2011. "A Multi-step Approach to Model the Relative Efficiency of European Ports: The Role of Regulation and Other Non-discretionary Factors," Chapters, in: Kevin Cullinane (ed.), International Handbook of Maritime Economics, chapter 18, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    9. Kammoun Rabeb, 2018. "The Technical Efficiency of Tunisian Ports: Comparing Data Envelopment Analysis and Stochastic Frontier Analysis Scores," Logistics, Supply Chain, Sustainability and Global Challenges, Sciendo, vol. 9(2), pages 73-84, October.
    10. Andreas Papatheodorou, 2002. "Exploring Competitiveness in Mediterranean Resorts," Tourism Economics, , vol. 8(2), pages 133-150, June.
    11. Yang Lin & Longzhong Yan & Ying-Ming Wang, 2019. "Performance Evaluation and Investment Analysis for Container Port Sustainable Development in China: An Inverse DEA Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-13, August.
    12. Talley, Wayne K., 2006. "Optimum Port Throughput," 47th Annual Transportation Research Forum, New York, New York, March 23-25, 2006 208010, Transportation Research Forum.
    13. da Costa, Denielle Soares & de Assis Carvalho, Marcus Vinicius Guerra Seraphico & de Figueiredo, Nélio Moura & de Moraes, Hito Braga & Ferreira, Regina Célia Brabo, 2021. "The efficiency of container terminals in the northern region of Brazil," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    14. Zhao, Deng & Zhen-fu, Li & Yu-tao, Zhou & Xiao, Chen & Shan-shan, Liang, 2020. "Measurement and spatial spillover effects of port comprehensive strength: Empirical evidence from China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 288-298.
    15. Nicole Adler & Georg Hirte & Shravana Kumar & Hans-Martin Niemeier, 2022. "The impact of specialization, ownership, competition and regulation on efficiency: a case study of Indian seaports," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 24(3), pages 507-536, September.
    16. Shih-Heng Yu & Chia-Wei Hsu, 2020. "A unified extension of super-efficiency in additive data envelopment analysis with integer-valued inputs and outputs: an application to a municipal bus system," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 287(1), pages 515-535, April.
    17. Sun, Jiasen & Yuan, Yang & Yang, Rui & Ji, Xiang & Wu, Jie, 2017. "Performance evaluation of Chinese port enterprises under significant environmental concerns: An extended DEA-based analysis," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 75-86.
    18. Yuen, Andrew Chi-lok & Zhang, Anming & Cheung, Waiman, 2013. "Foreign participation and competition: A way to improve the container port efficiency in China?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 220-231.
    19. Chang, Víctor & Tovar, Beatriz, 2014. "Efficiency and productivity changes for Peruvian and Chilean ports terminals: A parametric distance functions approach," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 83-94.
    20. Chia-Nan Wang & Phi-Hung Nguyen & Thi-Ly Nguyen & Thi-Giang Nguyen & Duc-Thinh Nguyen & Thi-Hoai Tran & Hong-Cham Le & Huong-Thuy Phung, 2022. "A Two-Stage DEA Approach to Measure Operational Efficiency in Vietnam’s Port Industry," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-21, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    seaport logistic capabilities; seaport competition; seaport facilities; seaport processes; shipping;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F19 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Other
    • M21 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics - - - Business Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nwe:eajour:y:2014:i:4:p:22-34. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Vanya Lazarova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/unweebg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.