IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nsr/niesra/i4y2021p14-15.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Box B: Furlough and household financial distress during the Covid-19 pandemic - insights for future lockdowns

Author

Listed:
  • Gortz, Christoph
  • McGowan, Danny
  • Yeromonahos, Mallory

Abstract

The Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme (CJRS) was a key element of the government's economic response to the Covid-19 pandemic. Introduced in March 2020, the CJRS aimed to safeguard jobs and income by allowing employers to place workers on temporary leave rather than making them redundant. A benefit of the scheme to employers was that they could reduce their wage bill while they closed during national lockdowns or in the face of low demand, as the government paid 80 per cent of furloughed workers' wages, up to a maximum of U+00A32,500 per month. When business conditions returned to normal, employers could draw upon their furloughed workforce to reactivate their businesses without incurring hiring costs and delays. Additionally, by maintaining links between employers and employees, the scheme avoided the loss of firm-specific skills.

Suggested Citation

  • Gortz, Christoph & McGowan, Danny & Yeromonahos, Mallory, 2021. "Box B: Furlough and household financial distress during the Covid-19 pandemic - insights for future lockdowns," National Institute UK Economic Outlook, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, issue 4, pages 14-15.
  • Handle: RePEc:nsr:niesra:i:4:y:2021:p:14-15
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.niesr.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/UK-Economic-Outlook-Autumn-2021.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. François Bourguignon & Amedeo Spadaro, 2006. "Microsimulation as a tool for evaluating redistribution policies," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 4(1), pages 77-106, April.
    2. Edouard Challe, 2020. "Uninsured Unemployment Risk and Optimal Monetary Policy in a Zero-Liquidity Economy," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 12(2), pages 241-283, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dumitru, Alexandra, 2021. "Box A: The European Union's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: levelling the EU carbon playing field," National Institute UK Economic Outlook, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, issue 4, pages 11-12.
    2. Arnab Bhattacharjee & Adrian Pabst & Tibor Szendrei & Geoffrey J. D. Hewings, 2024. "NiReMS: A regional model at household level combining spatial econometrics with dynamic microsimulation," Spatial Economic Analysis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(3), pages 436-461, July.
    3. Kennedy, Jack, 2021. "Box C: Wage pressures: a perspective from online job advertisements," National Institute UK Economic Outlook, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 0(4), pages 17-18.
    4. Lenoel, Cyrille & Macqueen, Rory & Mortimer-Lee, Paul, 2021. "Shortages and fiscal tightening threaten economic recovery from Covid-19," National Institute UK Economic Outlook, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, issue 4, pages 6-32.
    5. Kennedy, Jack, 2021. "Box C: Wage pressures: a perspective from online job advertisements," National Institute UK Economic Outlook, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, issue 4, pages 17-18.
    6. Chadha, Jagjit S., 2021. "Foreward: Rip it up and Start Again," National Institute UK Economic Outlook, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, issue 4, pages 1-3.
    7. Bhattacharjee, Arnab & Szendrei, Tibor, 2021. "Box E: Distributional impacts of Covid-19 and potential for policy intervention," National Institute UK Economic Outlook, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, issue 4, pages 41-44.
    8. Dumitru, Alexandra, 2021. "Box A: The European Union's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: levelling the EU carbon playing field," National Institute UK Economic Outlook, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 0(4), pages 11-12.
    9. Bhattacharjee, Arnab & Pabst, Adrian & Mosley, Max & Szendrei, Tibor, 2022. "UK Regional Outlook: Autumn 2021," National Institute UK Economic Outlook, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, issue 5, pages 29-40.
    10. Bhattacharjee, Arnab & Pabst, Adrian & Mosley, Max & Szendrei, Tibor, 2022. "UK Regional Outlook: Autumn 2021," National Institute UK Economic Outlook, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 0(5 Winter), pages 29-40.
    11. NIESR & Appendix, 2021. "Appendix," National Institute UK Economic Outlook, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 0(4), pages 45-53.
    12. Chadha, Jagjit S., 2021. "Foreward: Rip it up and Start Again," National Institute UK Economic Outlook, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 0(4), pages 1-3.
    13. Niesr, 2021. "Overview," National Institute UK Economic Outlook, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 0(4), pages 4-5.
    14. Gortz, Christoph & McGowan, Danny & Yeromonahos, Mallory, 2021. "Box B: Furlough and household financial distress during the Covid-19 pandemic - insights for future lockdowns," National Institute UK Economic Outlook, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 0(4), pages 14-15.
    15. NIESR & Appendix, 2021. "Appendix," National Institute UK Economic Outlook, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, issue 4, pages 45-53.
    16. Niesr, 2021. "Overview," National Institute UK Economic Outlook, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, issue 4, pages 4-5.
    17. Bhattacharjee, Arnab & Szendrei, Tibor, 2021. "Box E: Distributional impacts of Covid-19 and potential for policy intervention," National Institute UK Economic Outlook, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 0(4), pages 41-44.
    18. Lenoel, Cyrille & Macqueen, Rory & Mortimer-Lee, Paul, 2021. "Shortages and fiscal tightening threaten economic recovery from Covid-19," National Institute UK Economic Outlook, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 0(4), pages 6-32.
    19. Mortimer-Lee, Paul, 2021. "Box D: The new employment tax," National Institute UK Economic Outlook, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 0(4), pages 29-31.
    20. Mortimer-Lee, Paul, 2021. "Box D: The new employment tax," National Institute UK Economic Outlook, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, issue 4, pages 29-31.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nsr:niesra:i:4:y:2021:p:14-15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Library & Information Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/niesruk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.