IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/now/fnttom/0200000095.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Worker Productivity in Operations Management

Author

Listed:
  • KC, Diwas

Abstract

From Frederick Taylor’s study of brick laying manual laborers in the early 20th century, to the multi-year benchmarking of automotive plant productivity as part of the International Motor Vehicle Program, the systematic observation, measurement, and analysis of work has a strong tradition in operations management. Traditional manufacturing provided the setting for much of the early research on worker productivity. However, as we have now seen an inexorable shift towards more service driven economic output, especially in the industrialized economies, the research in operations management on worker productivity has also increasingly focused on services. This monograph will take stock of the literature in operations management on worker productivity. The research is not exhaustive but is meant to showcase some of the interesting and relevant papers that fall into a few key themes. Mainly, the individual worker is the focal unit of analysis, and the goal is to explore the various operational factors that allow the worker to become more productive. Key areas of emphasis include the behavioral microfoundations of productivity, the effect of peers and workplace dynamics, the design and organization of work, and ways to improve human capital. Although much is known about the drivers of worker productivity, much remains unexplored. Furthermore, looming changes to the modern workplace call for new ways to think about worker productivity. For example, artificial intelligence, new models of business, and novel workplace arrangements, all have important implications for the design and organization of the modern workplace, and for the roles and responsibilities of the knowledge worker. Collectively, these developments will continue to make worker productivity a rich and exciting area of research.

Suggested Citation

  • KC, Diwas, 2020. "Worker Productivity in Operations Management," Foundations and Trends(R) in Technology, Information and Operations Management, now publishers, vol. 13(3), pages 151-249, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:now:fnttom:0200000095
    DOI: 10.1561/0200000095
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/0200000095
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1561/0200000095?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anita L. Tucker & Sara J. Singer, 2015. "The Effectiveness of Management-By-Walking-Around: A Randomized Field Study," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 24(2), pages 253-271, February.
    2. Christian Terwiesch, 2019. "OM Forum—Empirical Research in Operations Management: From Field Studies to Analyzing Digital Exhaust," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 21(4), pages 713-722, October.
    3. Zeynep Ton & Robert S. Huckman, 2008. "Managing the Impact of Employee Turnover on Performance: The Role of Process Conformance," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(1), pages 56-68, February.
    4. Onesun Steve Yoo & Charles J. Corbett & Guillaume Roels, 2016. "Optimal Time Allocation for Process Improvement for Growth-Focused Entrepreneurs," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 18(3), pages 361-375, July.
    5. Tom Fangyun Tan & Serguei Netessine, 2014. "When Does the Devil Make Work? An Empirical Study of the Impact of Workload on Worker Productivity," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(6), pages 1574-1593, June.
    6. Anita L. Tucker, 2007. "An Empirical Study of System Improvement by Frontline Employees in Hospital Units," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 9(4), pages 492-505, April.
    7. Taylor, Frederick Winslow, 1911. "The Principles of Scientific Management," History of Economic Thought Books, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, number taylor1911.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luv Sharma & Aravind Chandrasekaran & Elliot Bendoly, 2020. "Does the Office of Patient Experience Matter in Improving Delivery of Care?," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(4), pages 833-855, April.
    2. Maria R. Ibanez & Jonathan R. Clark & Robert S. Huckman & Bradley R. Staats, 2018. "Discretionary Task Ordering: Queue Management in Radiological Services," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(9), pages 4389-4407, September.
    3. Seyed Morteza Emadi & Bradley R. Staats, 2020. "A Structural Estimation Approach to Study Agent Attrition," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(9), pages 4071-4095, September.
    4. Hailong Cui & Sampath Rajagopalan & Amy R. Ward, 2021. "Impact of Task-Level Worker Specialization, Workload, and Product Personalization on Consumer Returns," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 23(2), pages 346-366, March.
    5. Bradley R. Staats & Diwas S. KC & Francesca Gino, 2018. "Maintaining Beliefs in the Face of Negative News: The Moderating Role of Experience," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(2), pages 804-824, February.
    6. John W. Gardner*, 2020. "Managing Production Yields and Rework through Feedback on Speed, Quality, and Quantity," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(9), pages 2182-2209, September.
    7. Guillaume Roels, 2020. "High-Performance Practice Processes," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(4), pages 1509-1526, April.
    8. Christian Terwiesch & Marcelo Olivares & Bradley R. Staats & Vishal Gaur, 2020. "OM Forum—A Review of Empirical Operations Management over the Last Two Decades," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(4), pages 656-668, July.
    9. R. K. Jha & B. S. Sahay & P. Charan, 2016. "Healthcare operations management: a structured literature review," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 43(3), pages 259-279, September.
    10. Diwas S. KC & Bradley R. Staats & Maryam Kouchaki & Francesca Gino, 2020. "Task Selection and Workload: A Focus on Completing Easy Tasks Hurts Performance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(10), pages 4397-4416, October.
    11. Samantha M. Keppler & Jun Li & Di (Andrew) Wu, 2022. "Crowdfunding the Front Lines: An Empirical Study of Teacher-Driven School Improvement," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(12), pages 8809-8828, December.
    12. Diwas Singh KC & Stefan Scholtes & Christian Terwiesch, 2020. "Empirical Research in Healthcare Operations: Past Research, Present Understanding, and Future Opportunities," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 73-83, January.
    13. Susan Feng Lu & Lauren Xiaoyuan Lu, 2017. "Do Mandatory Overtime Laws Improve Quality? Staffing Decisions and Operational Flexibility of Nursing Homes," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(11), pages 3566-3585, November.
    14. Enno Siemsen & Aleda V. Roth & Sridhar Balasubramanian & Gopesh Anand, 2009. "The Influence of Psychological Safety and Confidence in Knowledge on Employee Knowledge Sharing," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 11(3), pages 429-447, April.
    15. Yuqian Xu & Tom Fangyun Tan & Serguei Netessine, 2022. "The Impact of Workload on Operational Risk: Evidence from a Commercial Bank," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(4), pages 2668-2693, April.
    16. Marshall Fisher & Marcelo Olivares & Bradley R. Staats, 2020. "Why Empirical Research Is Good for Operations Management, and What Is Good Empirical Operations Management?," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 170-178, January.
    17. Tom F. Tan & Bradley R. Staats, 2020. "Behavioral Drivers of Routing Decisions: Evidence from Restaurant Table Assignment," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(4), pages 1050-1070, April.
    18. Hummy Song & Anita L. Tucker & Karen L. Murrell & David R. Vinson, 2015. "Public Relative Performance Feedback in Complex Service Systems: Improving Productivity through the Adoption of Best Practices," Working Papers 96, Brandeis University, Department of Economics and International Business School.
    19. Linda Argote & Ella Miron-Spektor, 2011. "Organizational Learning: From Experience to Knowledge," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(5), pages 1123-1137, October.
    20. Aleda Roth & Eve Rosenzweig, 2020. "Advancing Empirical Science in Operations Management Research: A Clarion Call to Action," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 179-190, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:now:fnttom:0200000095. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lucy Wiseman (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nowpublishers.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.