IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/glopol/v15y2024i2p389-397.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Southern multilateralism from IBSA to NDB: Synergies, continuities and regional options

Author

Listed:
  • Chris Alden
  • Garth le Pere

Abstract

The shifting nature of contemporary global politics highlights the growing contestation about power and how it is distributed, with multipolarity as its hallmark and distinguishing feature. Amid the shift to multipolarity, new forms of multilateralism are emerging from the South, which are grounded in ‘institutional arrangements led by countries of the Global South’ in terms of the origin of initiatives, the drivers of such arrangements and the resources to sustain them. In this context, Southern Multilateralism offers a differ approach to classical Realist thinking where power is ‘the final arbiter of things political’. Southern Multilateralism has also given rise to new international institutional arrangements, such as the BRICS‐led New Development Bank (NDB) and its predecessor, the India, Brazil and South Africa (IBSA) Trilateral Forum and the IBSA Fund Facility for Poverty and Hunger Alleviation. This article compares the IBSA and their Fund with the NDB and argues that there are continuities and linkages between the NDB and the IBSA Fund, which have yet to be examined by scholars; and to be more precise, the NDB has absorbed and reflects, key attributes of the IBSA and their Fund. Moreover, this study concludes by suggesting regional collaboration options for the NDB, led by South Africa, India and Brazil and their respective regions, whereby the NDB can expand its global role and relevance in future via its regional offices, particularly by supporting the regional trade integration plans in Africa, South Asia and South America.

Suggested Citation

  • Chris Alden & Garth le Pere, 2024. "Southern multilateralism from IBSA to NDB: Synergies, continuities and regional options," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 15(2), pages 389-397, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:15:y:2024:i:2:p:389-397
    DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.13246
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13246
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1758-5899.13246?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrew Cooper, 2013. "Squeezed or revitalised? Middle powers, the G20 and the evolution of global governance," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(6), pages 963-984.
    2. Philip Golub, 2013. "From the New International Economic Order to the G20: how the ‘global South’ is restructuring world capitalism from within," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(6), pages 1000-1015.
    3. Flemes, Daniel, 2007. "Emerging Middle Powers' Soft Balancing Strategy: State and Perspectives of the IBSA Dialogue Forum," GIGA Working Papers 57, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
    4. Gilpin, Robert G., 1984. "The richness of the tradition of political realism," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 38(02), pages 287-304, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alden, Christopher & le Pere, Garth, 2023. "Southern multilateralism from IBSA to NDB: synergies, continuities, and regional options," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 119700, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Irena Melounová, 2016. "Prezidentská Diplomacie: Srovnání Tří Brazilských Prezidentů (Presidential Diplomacy: Three Brazilian Presidents In A Comparative Perspective)," Medzinarodne vztahy (Journal of International Relations), Ekonomická univerzita, Fakulta medzinárodných vzťahov, vol. 14(1), pages 93-118.
    3. Kaminski Joseph Jon, 2019. "Rethinking Realism and Constructivism Through the Lenses of Themes and Ontological Primacy," Croatian International Relations Review, Sciendo, vol. 25(85), pages 6-29, November.
    4. Mark Beeson & Jolanta Hewitt, 2022. "Does Multilateralism still Matter? ASEAN and the Arctic Council in Comparative Perspective," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 13(2), pages 208-218, May.
    5. Manuel Mejido Costoya, 2022. "South–South Cooperation and the Promise of Experimentalist Governance: The ASEAN Smart Cities Network," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(2), pages 116-127.
    6. Klingebiel, Stephan, 2017. "Rising powers and the provision of transnational public goods: conceptual considerations and features of South Africa as a case study," IDOS Discussion Papers 3/2017, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    7. Shim, David, 2009. "A Shrimp amongst Whales? Assessing South Korea's Regional-power Status," GIGA Working Papers 107, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
    8. Marieke Kleiboer, 1996. "Understanding Success and Failure of International Mediation," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 40(2), pages 360-389, June.
    9. Maximilian Terhalle, 2011. "Is Unipolarity Peaceful?," International Studies, , vol. 48(3-4), pages 317-324, July.
    10. Ardalan, Kavous, 2017. "Driving force of globalization: A multi- paradigmatic look," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 480-492.
    11. Aleksandra Kuczyńska-Zonik, 2016. "Ruská Makká Moc V Baltských Krajinách (Russia’S Soft Power In The Baltic States)," Medzinarodne vztahy (Journal of International Relations), Ekonomická univerzita, Fakulta medzinárodných vzťahov, vol. 14(1), pages 36-57.
    12. Schor Adriana, 2014. "South–South Cooperation and IBSA: More Trade in Politics," New Global Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 8(2), pages 183-201, July.
    13. Abb, Pascal, 2013. "What Drives Interstate Balancing? Estimations of Domestic and Systemic Factors," GIGA Working Papers 238, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
    14. Javier Vadell, 2019. "La iniciativa BRICS y China: entre la emergencia y la irrelevancia [A iniciativa BRICS e a China: entre a emergência e a irrelevância]," Nova Economia, Economics Department, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (Brazil), vol. 29(2), pages 401-428, May-Augus.
    15. Debashis Chakraborty & Pritam Banerjee & Dipankar Sengupta, 2012. "Developing Country Coalitions in WTO Negotiations: How cohesive would IBSAC (India, Brazil, South Africa, China) be?," Working Papers 1212, Indian Institute of Foreign Trade.
    16. Olyana Kinidbalyk, 2016. "Veľký Čiernomorský Región V Meniacom Sa Geopolitickom Kontexte (The Wider Black Sea Region Within The Changing Geopolitical Context)," Medzinarodne vztahy (Journal of International Relations), Ekonomická univerzita, Fakulta medzinárodných vzťahov, vol. 14(1), pages 8-18.
    17. Kojo S. Amanor, 2019. "Global Value Chains and Agribusiness in Africa: Upgrading or Capturing Smallholder Production?," Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy, Centre for Agrarian Research and Education for South, vol. 8(1-2), pages 30-63, April.
    18. Byungwon Woo, 2021. "Empirical categorization of middle powers and how different middle powers are treated in international organizations: The case of India and South Korea," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 24(2), pages 149-165, June.
    19. Antoniades, Andreas, 2015. "The New Resilience of Emerging and Developing Countries: Systemic Interlocking, Currency Swaps and Geoeconomics," MPRA Paper 68181, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Zeev Maoz, 1995. "National Preferences, International Structures and Balance-of-Power Politics," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 7(3), pages 369-394, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:15:y:2024:i:2:p:389-397. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.