IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nos/ynbvsn/16.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of innovative development of Ukrainian economy and determination of the mechanisms of its support

Author

Listed:
  • Zavadska Diana

    (Odessa National Economic University)

Abstract

The aim of the article is to elaborate the recommendations as to the support of economic development and formation of Ukrainian infrastructural environment, favorable for innovations. In the result of research the evaluation of Ukrainian economic development was done. The objective necessity of industrial policy under conditions global competition was grounded. The tendencies of the changes of economies of the world leading countries were studied. The directions of realization of new industrial policy of Ukraine under conditions of the formation of new economy were determined. The institutional infrastructure of regional development as to attraction of foreign investments and transfer of new technologies in Ukrainian industrial sector was offered. It was proved, that the determinative role for overcoming of structural disproportions in Ukrainian economy is played by innovative processes, which favorable development is possible due to the long-term investment resources. Realization of the mechanisms of state-private partnership, stimulation of innovative policy by the instruments of state policy will provide multiplier effect from the economic technological base modernization. The accent was made on the fact that economic development institutions are the important instrument of state policy as to creation of favorable conditions for innovative infrastructure formation. It was noted, that the role of information center, combination of the functions of economic development institutes is given to the Agency of regional development, created on the principles of partnership between state, private and public sectors, directed on stimulation of socio-economic development.

Suggested Citation

  • Zavadska Diana, 2017. "Evaluation of innovative development of Ukrainian economy and determination of the mechanisms of its support," Technology audit and production reserves, 2(34) 2017, Socionet;Technology audit and production reserves, vol. 2(5(34)), pages 36-44.
  • Handle: RePEc:nos:ynbvsn:16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://journals.uran.ua/tarp/article/view/99452
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andréanne Léger & Sushmita Swaminathan, 2007. "Innovation Theories: Relevance and Implications for Developing Country Innovation," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 743, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    2. Braunerhjelm, Pontus, 2010. "Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Economic Growth – Past experiences, current knowledge and policy implications," Working Papers 2010:2, Swedish Entrepreneurship Forum.
    3. Kelly D. Edmiston, 2007. "The role of small and large businesses in economic development," Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, vol. 92(Q II), pages 73-97.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. James McNulty & Marina Murdock & Nivine Richie, 2013. "Are commercial bank lending propensities useful in understanding small firm finance?," Journal of Economics and Finance, Springer;Academy of Economics and Finance, vol. 37(4), pages 511-527, October.
    2. Behroz Baraghoshi & Cihan Bilginsoy, 2013. "Interstate Variations in Private Sector Union Density in the U.S," Journal of Labor Research, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 180-202, June.
    3. Mr. Jose L. Torres, 2020. "Youth Unemployment in Uruguay," IMF Working Papers 2020/281, International Monetary Fund.
    4. Marek Matejun, 2017. "Characteristic features of small business and large firms: An empirical comparative study," Journal of Administrative and Business Studies, Professor Dr. Usman Raja, vol. 3(4), pages 192-203.
    5. Zara Daghbashyan & Björn Hårsman, 2014. "University choice and entrepreneurship," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 42(4), pages 729-746, April.
    6. Gary Clyde Hufbauer & Martin Vieiro, 2011. "US Tax Discrimination Against Large Corporations Should Be Discarded," Policy Briefs PB11-16, Peterson Institute for International Economics.
    7. Alvina Sabah Idrees & Saima Sarwar, 2021. "State effectiveness, property rights and entrepreneurial behaviour as determinants of National Innovation," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(3), pages 392-423, September.
    8. Víctor M. González Sánchez, 2018. "Self-employment, Knowledge and Economic Growth: An empirical study for Latin American countries," Contemporary Economics, University of Economics and Human Sciences in Warsaw., vol. 12(4), December.
    9. Dominic E. Azuh & Jeremiah O. Ejemeyovwi & Queen Adiat & Babatunde A. Ayanda, 2020. "Innovation and Human Development Perspectives in West Africa," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(4), pages 21582440209, December.
    10. Silviu Nate & Valentin Grecu & Andriy Stavytskyy & Ganna Kharlamova, 2022. "Fostering Entrepreneurial Ecosystems through the Stimulation and Mentorship of New Entrepreneurs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-18, June.
    11. Grădinaru Cătălin & Toma Sorin-George & Papuc Răzvan, 2017. "Entrepreneurship in the World: The Analysis of the Global Entrepreneurship Index in the Period 2015-2017," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(2), pages 14-18, December.
    12. Lee, Keun & Kim, Byung-Yeon & Park, Young-Yoon & Sanidas, Elias, 2013. "Big businesses and economic growth: Identifying a binding constraint for growth with country panel analysis," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 561-582.
    13. Michela Bia & Alessandra Mattei, 2012. "Assessing the effect of the amount of financial aids to Piedmont firms using the generalized propensity score," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 21(4), pages 485-516, November.
    14. Wim Naudé, 2011. "Foreign Aid for Innovation: The Missing Ingredient in Private Sector Development?," Working Papers 2011/35, Maastricht School of Management.
    15. Ullah, Ayat & Arshad, Muhammad & Kächele, Harald & Zeb, Alam & Mahmood, Nasir & Müller, Klaus, 2020. "Socio-economic analysis of farmers facing asymmetric information in inputs markets: evidence from the rainfed zone of Pakistan," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    16. Evgeny A. Kuzmin & Marina V. Vinogradova & Valentina E. Guseva, 2019. "Projection of enterprise survival rate in dynamics of regional economic sustainability: case study of Russia and the EU," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 6(4), pages 1602-1617, June.
    17. Andrzej P. Dabkowski, 2011. "Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth: An Investigation into the Relationship between Entrepreneurship and Total Factor Productivity Growth in the EU," CASE Network Studies and Analyses 427, CASE-Center for Social and Economic Research.
    18. Víctor M. González-Sánchez & Antonio Martínez Raya & Susana de los Ríos-Sastre, 2020. "An Empirical Study for European Countries: Factors Affecting Economic Growth and Self-Employment by Gender," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-15, November.
    19. Hart Hodges & Steven E. Henson, 2017. "Weak Foundations in Economic Development Programs," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 31(2), pages 116-127, May.
    20. Beata Ślusarczyk & Katarzyna Grondys, 2019. "Parametric Conditions of High Financial Risk in the SME Sector," Risks, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-17, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    deindustrialization; financing of innovative processes; state-private partnership; institutional infrastructure of regional development;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O11 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Macroeconomic Analyses of Economic Development

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nos:ynbvsn:16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Алина Макаренко (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://socionet.ru/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.