IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nea/journl/y2024i64p225-231.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evolution of the concept of "sovereignty" - is there a place for economic sovereignty in political science?

Author

Listed:
  • Solovyev, E.

    (Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia)

Abstract

The article examines the evolution of the concept of economic sovereignty and the key areas of discussion on the aspects of economic sovereignty in a changing world. It is argued that, despite all the disputed points, sovereignty remains the pillar of modern politics. The main discussions on the issue of economic sovereignty revolve around the two key concepts, i.e., that of independence and control. For developing countries, independence means, first of all, regaining control over their own resources. Developed countries are preoccupied with the problem of controlling economic (and technological) processes and resources in the global arena. The concept of economic sovereignty is gaining weight both in research community and in practical politics. The big debate on the issue of economic sovereignty is still ahead.

Suggested Citation

  • Solovyev, E., 2024. "Evolution of the concept of "sovereignty" - is there a place for economic sovereignty in political science?," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 64(3), pages 225-231.
  • Handle: RePEc:nea:journl:y:2024:i:64:p:225-231
    DOI: 10.31737/22212264_2024_3_225-231
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.econorus.org/repec/journl/2024-64-225-231r.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31737/22212264_2024_3_225-231?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    sovereignty; economic sovereignty; globalization; economic sovereignty of the EU; real sovereignty; developing countries;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F51 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - International Conflicts; Negotiations; Sanctions
    • Z18 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Public Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nea:journl:y:2024:i:64:p:225-231. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alexey Tcharykov (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nearuea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.