IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nea/journl/y2024i62p143-170.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the sectoral effects of digitalization based on new indicators by type of economic activity

Author

Listed:
  • Mironov, V.

    ("Development Center" Institute of the HSE University, Moscow, Russia)

  • Kuznetsov, A.

    ("Development Center" Institute of the HSE University, Moscow, Russia)

  • Konovalova, L.

    ("Development Center" Institute of the HSE University, Moscow, Russia)

Abstract

The article is devoted to the problem of quantifying the sectoral effects of digitalization of the economy. The experience in assessing the impact of digital transformation on economic growth is described. A methodology for assessing the sectoral effects of digitalization was proposed and tested on a panel of industrialized economies. It is based on the modified OECD approach, which was previously used by international experts and the Ministry of Economic Development of Russia at the macro level. This approach assumes econometric estimates based on panel regressions of the impact of the dynamics of economic policy indicators (including digitalization) on the components of a specially disaggregated production function. The key advantage of this approach is that it represents GDP growth (in our approach, sectoral output) as the sum of separate and independent components of the supply (capital intensity of output, labor force involvement and total factor productivity ("TFP")). This approach allows you to first assess the effect of digitalization on each component separately, and then, integrating the estimates obtained with certain weights and summing up with the contribution of "TFP", determine the overall impact of digitalization on the output growth. The transition to the sectoral level in assessing effects was made possible by the recent inclusion of sectoral digitalization indicators in the EU KLEMS database for 40 types of economic activity of 30 countries in the period 1995-2019. The preliminary estimates of the impact of digitalization on the growth of branches of economy output obtained during testing (for 10 selected sectors) allow us to note a serious differentiation of effects by branches of economy, as well as to point out some opportunities to enhance the effectiveness of economic policy in Russia taking into account some characteristics of the structure of its economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Mironov, V. & Kuznetsov, A. & Konovalova, L., 2024. "On the sectoral effects of digitalization based on new indicators by type of economic activity," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 62(1), pages 143-179.
    • Handle: RePEc:nea:journl:y:2024:i:62:p:143-170
    DOI: 10.31737/22212264_2024_1_143-170
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.econorus.org/repec/journl/2024-62-143-170r.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31737/22212264_2024_1_143-170?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bart van Ark & Robert Inklaar & Robert H. McGuckin, 2003. "ICT and Productivity in Europe and the United States Where Do the Differences Come From?," CESifo Economic Studies, CESifo Group, vol. 49(3), pages 295-318.
    2. Daron Acemoglu & Pascual Restrepo, 2020. "Robots and Jobs: Evidence from US Labor Markets," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 128(6), pages 2188-2244.
    3. Robert J. Barro, 1991. "Economic Growth in a Cross Section of Countries," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 106(2), pages 407-443.
    4. Thomas Niebel & Fabienne Rasel & Steffen Viete, 2019. "BIG data – BIG gains? Understanding the link between big data analytics and innovation," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(3), pages 296-316, April.
    5. Flavio Calvino & Chiara Criscuolo & Luca Marcolin & Mariagrazia Squicciarini, 2018. "A taxonomy of digital intensive sectors," OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers 2018/14, OECD Publishing.
    6. Dale W. Jorgenson & Mun S. Ho & Kevin J. Stiroh, 2008. "A Retrospective Look at the U.S. Productivity Growth Resurgence," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 22(1), pages 3-24, Winter.
    7. Balazs Egert, 2009. "Infrastructure investment in network industries: The role of incentive regulation and regulatory independence," William Davidson Institute Working Papers Series wp956, William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan.
    8. Daron Acemoglu & Pascual Restrepo, 2017. "Robots and Jobs: Evidence from US Labor Markets," Boston University - Department of Economics - Working Papers Series dp-297, Boston University - Department of Economics.
    9. Ms. Lusine Lusinyan, 2018. "Assessing the Impact of Structural Reforms Through a Supply-side Framework: The Case of Argentina," IMF Working Papers 2018/183, International Monetary Fund.
    10. William D. Nordhaus, 2021. "Are We Approaching an Economic Singularity? Information Technology and the Future of Economic Growth," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 13(1), pages 299-332, January.
    11. Emannuel Dhyne & Joep Konings & Joep Konings & Stijn Vanormelingen,, 2018. "IT and productivity: A firm level analysis," Working Paper Research 346, National Bank of Belgium.
    12. Guyllaume Faucher & Stephanie Houle, 2023. "Digitalization: Definition and Measurement," Discussion Papers 2023-20, Bank of Canada.
    13. Eric Bartelsman & George van Leeuwen & Michael Polder, 2017. "CDM using a cross-country micro moments database," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1-2), pages 168-182, February.
    14. Chad Syverson, 2011. "What Determines Productivity?," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 49(2), pages 326-365, June.
    15. Sebastian Barnes & Romain Bouis & Philippe Briard & Sean Dougherty & Mehmet Eris, 2013. "The GDP Impact of Reform: A Simple Simulation Framework," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 834, OECD Publishing.
    16. Philippe Aghion & Benjamin F. Jones & Charles I. Jones, 2018. "Artificial Intelligence and Economic Growth," NBER Chapters, in: The Economics of Artificial Intelligence: An Agenda, pages 237-282, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    17. Yingying Lu & Yixiao Zhou, 2019. "A short review on the economics of artificial intelligence," CAMA Working Papers 2019-54, Centre for Applied Macroeconomic Analysis, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
    18. Erik Brynjolfsson & Daniel Rock & Chad Syverson, 2018. "Artificial Intelligence and the Modern Productivity Paradox: A Clash of Expectations and Statistics," NBER Chapters, in: The Economics of Artificial Intelligence: An Agenda, pages 23-57, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    19. Jeffrey D. Sachs & Seth G. Benzell & Guillermo LaGarda, 2015. "Robots: Curse or Blessing? A Basic Framework," NBER Working Papers 21091, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    20. Luiz Carlos Bresser-Pereira, 2019. "From classical developmentalism and post-Keynesian macroeconomics to new developmentalism," Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, Center of Political Economy, vol. 39(2), pages 187-210.
    21. V. V. Mironov & L. D. Konovalova., 2019. "On the relationship of structural changes and economic growth in the world economy and Russia," VOPROSY ECONOMIKI, N.P. Redaktsiya zhurnala "Voprosy Economiki", vol. 1.
    22. Romain Bouis & Romain Duval, 2011. "Raising Potential Growth After the Crisis: A Quantitative Assessment of the Potential Gains from Various Structural Reforms in the OECD Area and Beyond," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 835, OECD Publishing.
    23. V. V. Mironov & L. D. Konovalova, 2019. "On the relationship of structural changes and economic growth in the world economy and Russia," Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP Voprosy Ekonomiki, issue 1.
    24. Jeffrey Mollins & Temel Taskin, 2023. "Digitalization: Productivity," Discussion Papers 2023-17, Bank of Canada.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Czarnitzki, Dirk & Fernández, Gastón P. & Rammer, Christian, 2023. "Artificial intelligence and firm-level productivity," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 188-205.
    2. Filippo Bertani & Marco Raberto & Andrea Teglio, 2020. "The productivity and unemployment effects of the digital transformation: an empirical and modelling assessment," Review of Evolutionary Political Economy, Springer, vol. 1(3), pages 329-355, November.
    3. Gries, Thomas & Naude, Wim, 2018. "Artificial intelligence, jobs, inequality and productivity: Does aggregate demand matter?," MERIT Working Papers 2018-047, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    4. Naude, Wim, 2019. "The race against the robots and the fallacy of the giant cheesecake: Immediate and imagined impacts of artificial intelligence," MERIT Working Papers 2019-005, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    5. Seth G. Benzell & Erik Brynjolfsson, 2019. "Digital Abundance and Scarce Genius: Implications for Wages, Interest Rates, and Growth," NBER Working Papers 25585, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Venturini, Francesco, 2022. "Intelligent technologies and productivity spillovers: Evidence from the Fourth Industrial Revolution," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 220-243.
    7. Ajay Agrawal & Joshua Gans & Avi Goldfarb, 2019. "Economic Policy for Artificial Intelligence," Innovation Policy and the Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 19(1), pages 139-159.
    8. Bertani, Filippo & Ponta, Linda & Raberto, Marco & Teglio, Andrea & Cincotti, Silvano, 2021. "The complexity of the intangible digital economy: an agent-based model," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 527-540.
    9. Yining Zhang & Zhong Wu, 2021. "Intelligence and Green Total Factor Productivity Based on China’s Province-Level Manufacturing Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-16, April.
    10. Nieddu, Marcello & Bertani, Filippo & Ponta, Linda, 2021. "Sustainability transition and digital trasformation: an agent-based perspective," MPRA Paper 106943, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Gregory, Terry & Salomons, Anna & Zierahn, Ulrich, 2016. "Racing With or Against the Machine? Evidence from Europe," VfS Annual Conference 2016 (Augsburg): Demographic Change 145843, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    12. Bernardo S Buarque & Ronald B Davies & Ryan M Hynes & Dieter F Kogler, 2020. "OK Computer: the creation and integration of AI in Europe," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 13(1), pages 175-192.
    13. Naudé, Wim & Dimitri, Nicola, 2018. "The Race for an Artificial General Intelligence: Implications for Public Policy," IZA Discussion Papers 11737, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    14. Ufuk Akcigit & Sina T. Ates, 2021. "Ten Facts on Declining Business Dynamism and Lessons from Endogenous Growth Theory," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 13(1), pages 257-298, January.
    15. Camiña, Ester & Díaz-Chao, Ángel & Torrent-Sellens, Joan, 2020. "Automation technologies: Long-term effects for Spanish industrial firms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    16. Marcello Nieddu & Filippo Bertani & Linda Ponta, 2022. "The sustainability transition and the digital transformation: two challenges for agent-based macroeconomic models," Review of Evolutionary Political Economy, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 193-226, April.
    17. Dario Cords & Klaus Prettner, 2022. "Technological unemployment revisited: automation in a search and matching framework [The future of work: meeting the global challenges of demographic change and automation]," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 74(1), pages 115-135.
    18. Lankisch, Clemens & Prettner, Klaus & Prskawetz, Alexia, 2019. "How can robots affect wage inequality?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 161-169.
    19. Hémous, David & Dechezleprêtre, Antoine & Olsen, Morten & Zanella, carlo, 2019. "Automating Labor: Evidence from Firm-level Patent Data," CEPR Discussion Papers 14249, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    20. Charles-Albert Lehalle, 2019. "La finance de marché à l’ère de l’intelligence bon marché," Revue d'économie financière, Association d'économie financière, vol. 0(3), pages 67-84.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    digital transformation; economic structure; advanced technologies; production function; economic policy;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • E20 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Consumption, Saving, Production, Employment, and Investment - - - General (includes Measurement and Data)
    • E23 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Consumption, Saving, Production, Employment, and Investment - - - Production
    • E26 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Consumption, Saving, Production, Employment, and Investment - - - Informal Economy; Underground Economy
    • E66 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook - - - General Outlook and Conditions
    • C54 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Quantitative Policy Modeling

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nea:journl:y:2024:i:62:p:143-170. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alexey Tcharykov (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nearuea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.