IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nea/journl/y2022i53p231-240.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Technological entrepreneurs of the Russian origin: Education, geography, industries

Author

Listed:
  • Tolmachev, D.

    (Ural Federal University, Ekaterinburg, Russia)

  • Chukavina, K.

    (Ural Federal University, Ekaterinburg, Russia)

  • Igoshina, E.

    (Ural Federal University, Ekaterinburg, Russia)

Abstract

Among the outstanding technology startups of the international level, there are often companies created by the Russian founders: Telegram, Revolut, Miro and many others. The authors wondered how the technology startups founded by Russians were distributed around the world and how many stayed in the country. This led to a few related issues. In which jurisdictions are tech startups with the Russian origin more comfortable to exist and why, where it is more probable to attract higher investment, in which industries Russian founders create startups? The issue of determining the "Russian origin" of the founder deserves special attention. The authors define it through higher education: if the founder received a Russian higher education, then, regardless of citizenship and nationality, he is considered as a Russian. The study analyzes the educational trajectories of the founders, the connections of headquarters' locations with origins of the founders, the profiles of the founders (age, work experience and other characteristics). The role of universities in the education process of technological entrepreneurs is revealed, including the potential for generating technological entrepreneurs in various regions of the country. The authors conclude that while the absolute amount of investment attracted in Russia is maintained at the same level, its share is falling. The number of technology startups choosing Russia as their main jurisdiction is also decreasing. Results show that success in attracting investment is positively affected by the early experience in launching a startup (university years), as well as by technical education. The authors state the difference in the industry structure of startups created by the Russians from the world average in favor of IT, robotics, and artificial intelligence to the detriment of medicine, trade, and business services. The conclusion is: universities in such cities as St. Petersburg, Yekaterinburg, Novosibirsk are poorly using the potential of generating technological entrepreneurs.

Suggested Citation

  • Tolmachev, D. & Chukavina, K. & Igoshina, E., 2022. "Technological entrepreneurs of the Russian origin: Education, geography, industries," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 53(1), pages 231-240.
    • Handle: RePEc:nea:journl:y:2022:i:53:p:231-240
    DOI: 10.31737/2221-2264-2022-53-1-13
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.econorus.org/repec/journl/2022-53-231-240r.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31737/2221-2264-2022-53-1-13?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel Ratzinger & Kevin Amess & Andrew Greenman & Simon Mosey, 2018. "The impact of digital start-up founders’ higher education on reaching equity investment milestones," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 43(3), pages 760-778, June.
    2. Magnus Klofsten & Alain Fayolle & Maribel Guerrero & Sarfraz Mian & David Urbano & Mike Wright, 2019. "The entrepreneurial university as driver for economic growth and social change : Key strategic challenges," Post-Print hal-02312272, HAL.
    3. Wai Fong Boh & Uzi De-Haan & Robert Strom, 2016. "University technology transfer through entrepreneurship: faculty and students in spinoffs," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 41(4), pages 661-669, August.
    4. Giorgio Calcagnini & Ilario Favaretto & Germana Giombini & Francesco Perugini & Rosalba Rombaldoni, 2016. "The role of universities in the location of innovative start-ups," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 41(4), pages 670-693, August.
    5. Klofsten, Magnus & Fayolle, Alain & Guerrero, Maribel & Mian, Sarfraz & Urbano, David & Wright, Mike, 2019. "The entrepreneurial university as driver for economic growth and social change - Key strategic challenges," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 149-158.
    6. Kamilia Loukil, 2019. "Impact of entrepreneurial activity on technological innovation in emerging and developing countries," E3 Journal of Business Management and Economics., E3 Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 017-030.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Magnus Klofsten & Dylan Jones-Evans & Luciana Pereira, 2021. "Teaching science and technology PhD students in entrepreneurship-potential learning opportunities and outcomes," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 46(2), pages 319-334, April.
    2. Shahid Qureshi & Sarfraz Mian, 2021. "Transfer of entrepreneurship education best practices from business schools to engineering and technology institutions: evidence from Pakistan," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 46(2), pages 366-392, April.
    3. Maha Aly & Galal Galal-Edeen, 2021. "Why is Germany less entrepreneurial? A behavioral reasoning perspective," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 46(5), pages 1376-1416, October.
    4. Ferran Giones & Kari Kleine & Silke Tegtmeier, 2022. "Students as scientists’ co-pilots at the onset of technology transfer: a two-way learning process," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 47(5), pages 1373-1394, October.
    5. M.A. Yurevich, 2021. "Global Transformation of Higher Education: From Traditional to Entrepreneurial University," Journal of Applied Economic Research, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University, vol. 20(3), pages 560-581.
    6. Shen, Huijun & Coreynen, Wim & Huang, Can, 2023. "Prestige and technology-transaction prices: Evidence from patent-selling by Chinese universities," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    7. Roncancio-Marin, Jason & Dentchev, Nikolay & Guerrero, Maribel & Díaz-González, Abel & Crispeels, Thomas, 2022. "University-Industry joint undertakings with high societal impact: A micro-processes approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    8. Kim, Young-Choon & Kotha, Reddi & Rhee, Mooweon, 2024. "Do firms with technological capabilities rush in? Evidence from the timing of licensing of Stanford inventions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    9. Shuiyun Liu & Peter C. van der Sijde, 2021. "Towards the Entrepreneurial University 2.0: Reaffirming the Responsibility of Universities in the Era of Accountability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-14, March.
    10. Flores, Maria Cecilia & Grimaldi, Rosa & Poli, Silvia & Villani, Elisa, 2024. "Entrepreneurial universities and intrapreneurship: A process model on the emergence of an intrapreneurial university," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    11. Holger Graf & Matthias Menter, 2022. "Public research and the quality of inventions: the role and impact of entrepreneurial universities and regional network embeddedness," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 58(2), pages 1187-1204, February.
    12. O'Kane, Conor & Mangematin, Vincent & Zhang, Jing A. & Cunningham, James A., 2020. "How university-based principal investigators shape a hybrid role identity," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    13. Henry, Colette & Lahikainen, Katja, 2024. "Exploring Intrapreneurial Activities in the Context of the Entrepreneurial University: An analysis of five EU HEIs," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    14. Bijedić, Teita & Schröder, Christian & Werner, Arndt & Chen, Xiangyu, 2023. "How do working conditions, network relationships, and institutional support offers effect entrepreneurial intentions of German university scientists?," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    15. de Obesso, Maria de las Mercedes & Núñez-Canal, Margarita & Pérez-Rivero, Carlos Alberto, 2023. "How do students perceive educators' digital competence in higher education?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    16. Engzell, Jeanette & Karabag, Solmaz Filiz & Yström, Anna, 2024. "Academic intrapreneurs navigating multiple institutional logics: An integrative framework for understanding and supporting intrapreneurship in universities," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    17. Klofsten, Magnus & Lundmark, Erik & Wennberg, Karl & Bank, Nata, 2020. "Incubator specialization and size: Divergent paths towards operational scale," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    18. Chan, Yolande E. & Krishnamurthy, Rashmi & Sadreddin, Arman, 2022. "Digitally-enabled university incubation processes," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    19. Gonçalo Rodrigues Brás & Miguel Torres Preto & Ana Dias Daniel & Aurora A. C. Teixeira, 2023. "Assessing the Impact of Universities’ Entrepreneurial Activity on Regional Competitiveness," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-21, January.
    20. Holgersson, Marcus & Aaboen, Lise, 2019. "A literature review of intellectual property management in technology transfer offices: From appropriation to utilization," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    technological entrepreneurship; higher education; startups; university; business school;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I23 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Higher Education; Research Institutions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nea:journl:y:2022:i:53:p:231-240. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alexey Tcharykov (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nearuea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.