IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v578y2020i7795d10.1038_s41586-020-1991-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Preindustrial 14CH4 indicates greater anthropogenic fossil CH4 emissions

Author

Listed:
  • Benjamin Hmiel

    (University of Rochester (UR))

  • V. V. Petrenko

    (University of Rochester (UR))

  • M. N. Dyonisius

    (University of Rochester (UR))

  • C. Buizert

    (Oregon State University (OSU))

  • A. M. Smith

    (Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (ANSTO))

  • P. F. Place

    (University of Rochester (UR))

  • C. Harth

    (University of California San Diego)

  • R. Beaudette

    (University of California San Diego)

  • Q. Hua

    (Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (ANSTO))

  • B. Yang

    (Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (ANSTO))

  • I. Vimont

    (University of Colorado and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Global Monitoring Division (GMD))

  • S. E. Michel

    (University of Colorado)

  • J. P. Severinghaus

    (University of California San Diego)

  • D. Etheridge

    (Climate Science Centre, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) Oceans and Atmosphere)

  • T. Bromley

    (National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA))

  • J. Schmitt

    (University of Bern)

  • X. Faïn

    (University of Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, IRD, Grenoble INP, Institut des Géosciences de l’Environnement (IGE))

  • R. F. Weiss

    (University of California San Diego)

  • E. Dlugokencky

    (NOAA, Earth System Research Laboratory (ESRL))

Abstract

Atmospheric methane (CH4) is a potent greenhouse gas, and its mole fraction has more than doubled since the preindustrial era1. Fossil fuel extraction and use are among the largest anthropogenic sources of CH4 emissions, but the precise magnitude of these contributions is a subject of debate2,3. Carbon-14 in CH4 (14CH4) can be used to distinguish between fossil (14C-free) CH4 emissions and contemporaneous biogenic sources; however, poorly constrained direct 14CH4 emissions from nuclear reactors have complicated this approach since the middle of the 20th century4,5. Moreover, the partitioning of total fossil CH4 emissions (presently 172 to 195 teragrams CH4 per year)2,3 between anthropogenic and natural geological sources (such as seeps and mud volcanoes) is under debate; emission inventories suggest that the latter account for about 40 to 60 teragrams CH4 per year6,7. Geological emissions were less than 15.4 teragrams CH4 per year at the end of the Pleistocene, about 11,600 years ago8, but that period is an imperfect analogue for present-day emissions owing to the large terrestrial ice sheet cover, lower sea level and extensive permafrost. Here we use preindustrial-era ice core 14CH4 measurements to show that natural geological CH4 emissions to the atmosphere were about 1.6 teragrams CH4 per year, with a maximum of 5.4 teragrams CH4 per year (95 per cent confidence limit)—an order of magnitude lower than the currently used estimates. This result indicates that anthropogenic fossil CH4 emissions are underestimated by about 38 to 58 teragrams CH4 per year, or about 25 to 40 per cent of recent estimates. Our record highlights the human impact on the atmosphere and climate, provides a firm target for inventories of the global CH4 budget, and will help to inform strategies for targeted emission reductions9,10.

Suggested Citation

  • Benjamin Hmiel & V. V. Petrenko & M. N. Dyonisius & C. Buizert & A. M. Smith & P. F. Place & C. Harth & R. Beaudette & Q. Hua & B. Yang & I. Vimont & S. E. Michel & J. P. Severinghaus & D. Etheridge &, 2020. "Preindustrial 14CH4 indicates greater anthropogenic fossil CH4 emissions," Nature, Nature, vol. 578(7795), pages 409-412, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:578:y:2020:i:7795:d:10.1038_s41586-020-1991-8
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-1991-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-1991-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-020-1991-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kemfert, Claudia & Präger, Fabian & Braunger, Isabell & Hoffart, Franziska M. & Brauers, Hanna, 2022. "The expansion of natural gas infrastructure puts energy transitions at risk," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 7, pages 582-587.
    2. Mark Agerton & Ben Gilbert & Gregory B. Upton Jr., 2021. "The Economics of Natural Gas Venting, Flaring and Leaking in U.S. Shale: An Agenda for Research and Policy," Working Papers 2021-02, Colorado School of Mines, Division of Economics and Business.
    3. Diosey Ramon Lugo-Morin, 2021. "Global Future: Low-Carbon Economy or High-Carbon Economy?," World, MDPI, vol. 2(2), pages 1-19, April.
    4. Webb, Jeremy & Longden, Thomas & Boulaire, Fanny & Gono, Marcel & Wilson, Clevo, 2023. "The application of green finance to the production of blue and green hydrogen: A comparative study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(P1).
    5. Marek Borowski & Piotr Życzkowski & Jianwei Cheng & Rafał Łuczak & Klaudia Zwolińska, 2020. "The Combustion of Methane from Hard Coal Seams in Gas Engines as a Technology Leading to Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions—Electricity Prediction Using ANN," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-18, August.
    6. Lu Shen & Daniel J. Jacob & Ritesh Gautam & Mark Omara & Tia R. Scarpelli & Alba Lorente & Daniel Zavala-Araiza & Xiao Lu & Zichong Chen & Jintai Lin, 2023. "National quantifications of methane emissions from fuel exploitation using high resolution inversions of satellite observations," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-9, December.
    7. Robert V. Parsons, 2021. "Canada as a Case Study for Balanced Presentation to Address Controversy on Emission Reduction Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-21, July.
    8. Pavel Serov & Rune Mattingsdal & Monica Winsborrow & Henry Patton & Karin Andreassen, 2023. "Widespread natural methane and oil leakage from sub-marine Arctic reservoirs," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:578:y:2020:i:7795:d:10.1038_s41586-020-1991-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.