IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v574y2019i7780d10.1038_s41586-019-1684-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Arthropod decline in grasslands and forests is associated with landscape-level drivers

Author

Listed:
  • Sebastian Seibold

    (Technical University of Munich
    Julius-Maximilians-University Würzburg)

  • Martin M. Gossner

    (Forest Entomology, Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL)

  • Nadja K. Simons

    (Technical University of Munich
    Technical University of Darmstadt)

  • Nico Blüthgen

    (Technical University of Darmstadt)

  • Jörg Müller

    (Julius-Maximilians-University Würzburg
    Bavarian Forest National Park)

  • Didem Ambarlı

    (Technical University of Munich
    Düzce University)

  • Christian Ammer

    (University of Göttingen)

  • Jürgen Bauhus

    (University of Freiburg)

  • Markus Fischer

    (University of Bern)

  • Jan C. Habel

    (Technical University of Munich
    Salzburg University)

  • Karl Eduard Linsenmair

    (Julius-Maximilians-University Würzburg)

  • Thomas Nauss

    (Philipps-University Marburg)

  • Caterina Penone

    (University of Bern)

  • Daniel Prati

    (University of Bern)

  • Peter Schall

    (University of Göttingen)

  • Ernst-Detlef Schulze

    (Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry)

  • Juliane Vogt

    (Technical University of Munich)

  • Stephan Wöllauer

    (Philipps-University Marburg)

  • Wolfgang W. Weisser

    (Technical University of Munich)

Abstract

Recent reports of local extinctions of arthropod species1, and of massive declines in arthropod biomass2, point to land-use intensification as a major driver of decreasing biodiversity. However, to our knowledge, there are no multisite time series of arthropod occurrences across gradients of land-use intensity with which to confirm causal relationships. Moreover, it remains unclear which land-use types and arthropod groups are affected, and whether the observed declines in biomass and diversity are linked to one another. Here we analyse data from more than 1 million individual arthropods (about 2,700 species), from standardized inventories taken between 2008 and 2017 at 150 grassland and 140 forest sites in 3 regions of Germany. Overall gamma diversity in grasslands and forests decreased over time, indicating loss of species across sites and regions. In annually sampled grasslands, biomass, abundance and number of species declined by 67%, 78% and 34%, respectively. The decline was consistent across trophic levels and mainly affected rare species; its magnitude was independent of local land-use intensity. However, sites embedded in landscapes with a higher cover of agricultural land showed a stronger temporal decline. In 30 forest sites with annual inventories, biomass and species number—but not abundance—decreased by 41% and 36%, respectively. This was supported by analyses of all forest sites sampled in three-year intervals. The decline affected rare and abundant species, and trends differed across trophic levels. Our results show that there are widespread declines in arthropod biomass, abundance and the number of species across trophic levels. Arthropod declines in forests demonstrate that loss is not restricted to open habitats. Our results suggest that major drivers of arthropod decline act at larger spatial scales, and are (at least for grasslands) associated with agriculture at the landscape level. This implies that policies need to address the landscape scale to mitigate the negative effects of land-use practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Sebastian Seibold & Martin M. Gossner & Nadja K. Simons & Nico Blüthgen & Jörg Müller & Didem Ambarlı & Christian Ammer & Jürgen Bauhus & Markus Fischer & Jan C. Habel & Karl Eduard Linsenmair & Thoma, 2019. "Arthropod decline in grasslands and forests is associated with landscape-level drivers," Nature, Nature, vol. 574(7780), pages 671-674, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:574:y:2019:i:7780:d:10.1038_s41586-019-1684-3
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1684-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-019-1684-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-019-1684-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Felix Neff & Fränzi Korner-Nievergelt & Emmanuel Rey & Matthias Albrecht & Kurt Bollmann & Fabian Cahenzli & Yannick Chittaro & Martin M. Gossner & Carlos Martínez-Núñez & Eliane S. Meier & Christian , 2022. "Different roles of concurring climate and regional land-use changes in past 40 years’ insect trends," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    2. Jessika Konrad & Ralph Platen & Michael Glemnitz, 2024. "The Effects of Vegetation Structure and Timber Harvesting on Ground Beetle (Col.: Carabidae) and Arachnid Communities (Arach.: Araneae, Opiliones) in Short-Rotation Coppices," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-30, January.
    3. Johannes Uhler & Sarah Redlich & Jie Zhang & Torsten Hothorn & Cynthia Tobisch & Jörg Ewald & Simon Thorn & Sebastian Seibold & Oliver Mitesser & Jérôme Morinière & Vedran Bozicevic & Caryl S. Benjami, 2021. "Relationship of insect biomass and richness with land use along a climate gradient," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-9, December.
    4. Zheng, Liang & Wang, Ying & Li, Jiangfeng, 2023. "Quantifying the spatial impact of landscape fragmentation on habitat quality: A multi-temporal dimensional comparison between the Yangtze River Economic Belt and Yellow River Basin of China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    5. Patrick José Jeetze & Isabelle Weindl & Justin Andrew Johnson & Pasquale Borrelli & Panos Panagos & Edna J. Molina Bacca & Kristine Karstens & Florian Humpenöder & Jan Philipp Dietrich & Sara Minoli &, 2023. "Projected landscape-scale repercussions of global action for climate and biodiversity protection," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    6. Sacher, Philipp & Meyerhoff, Jürgen & Mayer, Marius, 2022. "Evidence of the association between deadwood and forest recreational site choices," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    7. Angela Turck & Wiltrud Terlau, 2023. "Hesitations and Aspirations of Farmers in Nature-Protected Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-12, February.
    8. Gackstetter, David & von Bloh, Malte & Hannus, Veronika & Meyer, Sebastian T. & Weisser, Wolfgang & Luksch, Claudia & Asseng, Senthold, 2023. "Autonomous field management – An enabler of sustainable future in agriculture," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    9. Lucie Vykydalová & Petra Martínez Barroso & Igor Děkanovský & Eva Hrudová & Yentriani Rumeta Lumbantobing & Markéta Michutová & Jan Winkler, 2024. "The Response of Insects and Weeds within the Crop to Variation in Sowing Density of Canola," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-15, September.
    10. Nan-Ji Jiang & Hetan Chang & Jerrit Weißflog & Franziska Eberl & Daniel Veit & Kerstin Weniger & Bill S. Hansson & Markus Knaden, 2023. "Ozone exposure disrupts insect sexual communication," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-7, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:574:y:2019:i:7780:d:10.1038_s41586-019-1684-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.