IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v558y2018i7711d10.1038_s41586-018-0244-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A synaptic threshold mechanism for computing escape decisions

Author

Listed:
  • Dominic A. Evans

    (MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology
    UCL Sainsbury Wellcome Centre for Neural Circuits and Behaviour)

  • A. Vanessa Stempel

    (MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology
    UCL Sainsbury Wellcome Centre for Neural Circuits and Behaviour)

  • Ruben Vale

    (MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology
    UCL Sainsbury Wellcome Centre for Neural Circuits and Behaviour)

  • Sabine Ruehle

    (MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology
    UCL Sainsbury Wellcome Centre for Neural Circuits and Behaviour)

  • Yaara Lefler

    (MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology
    UCL Sainsbury Wellcome Centre for Neural Circuits and Behaviour)

  • Tiago Branco

    (MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology
    UCL Sainsbury Wellcome Centre for Neural Circuits and Behaviour)

Abstract

Escaping from imminent danger is an instinctive behaviour that is fundamental for survival, and requires the classification of sensory stimuli as harmless or threatening. The absence of threat enables animals to forage for essential resources, but as the level of threat and potential for harm increases, they have to decide whether or not to seek safety 1 . Despite previous work on instinctive defensive behaviours in rodents2–11, little is known about how the brain computes the threat level for initiating escape. Here we show that the probability and vigour of escape in mice scale with the saliency of innate threats, and are well described by a model that computes the distance between the threat level and an escape threshold. Calcium imaging and optogenetics in the midbrain of freely behaving mice show that the activity of excitatory neurons in the deep layers of the medial superior colliculus (mSC) represents the saliency of the threat stimulus and is predictive of escape, whereas glutamatergic neurons of the dorsal periaqueductal grey (dPAG) encode exclusively the choice to escape and control escape vigour. We demonstrate a feed-forward monosynaptic excitatory connection from mSC to dPAG neurons, which is weak and unreliable—yet required for escape behaviour—and provides a synaptic threshold for dPAG activation and the initiation of escape. This threshold can be overcome by high mSC network activity because of short-term synaptic facilitation and recurrent excitation within the mSC, which amplifies and sustains synaptic drive to the dPAG. Therefore, dPAG glutamatergic neurons compute escape decisions and escape vigour using a synaptic mechanism to threshold threat information received from the mSC, and provide a biophysical model of how the brain performs a critical behavioural computation.

Suggested Citation

  • Dominic A. Evans & A. Vanessa Stempel & Ruben Vale & Sabine Ruehle & Yaara Lefler & Tiago Branco, 2018. "A synaptic threshold mechanism for computing escape decisions," Nature, Nature, vol. 558(7711), pages 590-594, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:558:y:2018:i:7711:d:10.1038_s41586-018-0244-6
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0244-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-018-0244-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-018-0244-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alyse Thomas & Weiguo Yang & Catherine Wang & Sri Laasya Tipparaju & Guang Chen & Brennan Sullivan & Kylie Swiekatowski & Mahima Tatam & Charles Gerfen & Nuo Li, 2023. "Superior colliculus bidirectionally modulates choice activity in frontal cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-22, December.
    2. Ami Ritter & Shlomi Habusha & Lior Givon & Shahaf Edut & Oded Klavir, 2024. "Prefrontal control of superior colliculus modulates innate escape behavior following adversity," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Suma Chinta & Scott R. Pluta, 2023. "Neural mechanisms for the localization of unexpected external motion," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
    4. Wei Shang & Shuangyi Xie & Wenbo Feng & Zhuangzhuang Li & Jingyan Jia & Xiaoxiao Cao & Yanting Shen & Jing Li & Haibo Shi & Yiran Gu & Shi-Jun Weng & Longnian Lin & Yi-Hsuan Pan & Xiao-Bing Yuan, 2024. "A non-image-forming visual circuit mediates the innate fear of heights in male mice," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.
    5. Clément Solié & Alessandro Contestabile & Pedro Espinosa & Stefano Musardo & Sebastiano Bariselli & Chieko Huber & Alan Carleton & Camilla Bellone, 2022. "Superior Colliculus to VTA pathway controls orienting response and influences social interaction in mice," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    6. Fernando M. C. V. Reis & Sandra Maesta-Pereira & Matthias Ollivier & Peter J. Schuette & Ekayana Sethi & Blake A. Miranda & Emily Iniguez & Meghmik Chakerian & Eric Vaughn & Megha Sehgal & Darren C. T, 2024. "Control of feeding by a bottom-up midbrain-subthalamic pathway," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-20, December.
    7. Jacob D Davidson & Ahmed El Hady, 2019. "Foraging as an evidence accumulation process," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-25, July.
    8. Takashi Nagashima & Suguru Tohyama & Kaori Mikami & Masashi Nagase & Mieko Morishima & Atsushi Kasai & Hitoshi Hashimoto & Ayako M. Watabe, 2022. "Parabrachial-to-parasubthalamic nucleus pathway mediates fear-induced suppression of feeding in male mice," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:558:y:2018:i:7711:d:10.1038_s41586-018-0244-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.