IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v450y2007i7168d10.1038_nature06289.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A synaptic memory trace for cortical receptive field plasticity

Author

Listed:
  • Robert C. Froemke

    (Coleman Memorial Laboratory and W. M. Keck Foundation Center for Integrative Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143, USA)

  • Michael M. Merzenich

    (Coleman Memorial Laboratory and W. M. Keck Foundation Center for Integrative Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143, USA)

  • Christoph E. Schreiner

    (Coleman Memorial Laboratory and W. M. Keck Foundation Center for Integrative Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143, USA)

Abstract

Receptive fields of sensory cortical neurons are plastic, changing in response to alterations of neural activity or sensory experience1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12. In this way, cortical representations of the sensory environment can incorporate new information about the world, depending on the relevance or value of particular stimuli1,6,9. Neuromodulation is required for cortical plasticity, but it is uncertain how subcortical neuromodulatory systems, such as the cholinergic nucleus basalis, interact with and refine cortical circuits13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24. Here we determine the dynamics of synaptic receptive field plasticity in the adult primary auditory cortex (also known as AI) using in vivo whole-cell recording. Pairing sensory stimulation with nucleus basalis activation shifted the preferred stimuli of cortical neurons by inducing a rapid reduction of synaptic inhibition within seconds, which was followed by a large increase in excitation, both specific to the paired stimulus. Although nucleus basalis was stimulated only for a few minutes, reorganization of synaptic tuning curves progressed for hours thereafter: inhibition slowly increased in an activity-dependent manner to rebalance the persistent enhancement of excitation, leading to a retuned receptive field with new preference for the paired stimulus. This restricted period of disinhibition may be a fundamental mechanism for receptive field plasticity, and could serve as a memory trace9,25 for stimuli or episodes that have acquired new behavioural significance.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert C. Froemke & Michael M. Merzenich & Christoph E. Schreiner, 2007. "A synaptic memory trace for cortical receptive field plasticity," Nature, Nature, vol. 450(7168), pages 425-429, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:450:y:2007:i:7168:d:10.1038_nature06289
    DOI: 10.1038/nature06289
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/nature06289
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/nature06289?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Margot C Bjoring & C Daniel Meliza, 2019. "A low-threshold potassium current enhances sparseness and reliability in a model of avian auditory cortex," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-20, January.
    2. Panna Hegedüs & Bálint Király & Dániel Schlingloff & Victoria Lyakhova & Anna Velencei & Írisz Szabó & Márton I. Mayer & Zsofia Zelenak & Gábor Nyiri & Balázs Hangya, 2024. "Parvalbumin-expressing basal forebrain neurons mediate learning from negative experience," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-20, December.
    3. Carina Curto & Vladimir Itskov, 2008. "Cell Groups Reveal Structure of Stimulus Space," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(10), pages 1-13, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:450:y:2007:i:7168:d:10.1038_nature06289. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.