IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v424y2003i6944d10.1038_nature01761.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Melanopsin and rod–cone photoreceptive systems account for all major accessory visual functions in mice

Author

Listed:
  • S. Hattar

    (Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine)

  • R. J. Lucas

    (Imperial College London)

  • N. Mrosovsky

    (University of Toronto)

  • S. Thompson

    (Imperial College London)

  • R. H. Douglas

    (City University)

  • M. W. Hankins

    (Imperial College London)

  • J. Lem

    (Tufts University School of Medicine)

  • M. Biel

    (Lehrstuhl Pharmakologie für Naturwissenschaften, Zentrum für Pharmaforschung, Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München)

  • F. Hofmann

    (Technische Universität München)

  • R. G. Foster

    (Imperial College London)

  • K.-W. Yau

    (Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine)

Abstract

In the mammalian retina, besides the conventional rod–cone system, a melanopsin-associated photoreceptive system exists that conveys photic information for accessory visual functions such as pupillary light reflex and circadian photo-entrainment1,2,3,4,5,6,7. On ablation of the melanopsin gene, retinal ganglion cells that normally express melanopsin are no longer intrinsically photosensitive8. Furthermore, pupil reflex8, light-induced phase delays of the circadian clock9,10 and period lengthening of the circadian rhythm in constant light9,10 are all partially impaired. Here, we investigated whether additional photoreceptive systems participate in these responses. Using mice lacking rods and cones, we measured the action spectrum for phase-shifting the circadian rhythm of locomotor behaviour. This spectrum matches that for the pupillary light reflex in mice of the same genotype11, and that for the intrinsic photosensitivity of the melanopsin-expressing retinal ganglion cells7. We have also generated mice lacking melanopsin coupled with disabled rod and cone phototransduction mechanisms. These animals have an intact retina but fail to show any significant pupil reflex, to entrain to light/dark cycles, and to show any masking response to light. Thus, the rod–cone and melanopsin systems together seem to provide all of the photic input for these accessory visual functions.

Suggested Citation

  • S. Hattar & R. J. Lucas & N. Mrosovsky & S. Thompson & R. H. Douglas & M. W. Hankins & J. Lem & M. Biel & F. Hofmann & R. G. Foster & K.-W. Yau, 2003. "Melanopsin and rod–cone photoreceptive systems account for all major accessory visual functions in mice," Nature, Nature, vol. 424(6944), pages 75-81, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:424:y:2003:i:6944:d:10.1038_nature01761
    DOI: 10.1038/nature01761
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/nature01761
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/nature01761?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pei-Yu Huang & Bi-Yi Jiang & Hong-Ji Chen & Jia-Yi Xu & Kang Wang & Cheng-Yi Zhu & Xin-Yan Hu & Dong Li & Liang Zhen & Fei-Chi Zhou & Jing-Kai Qin & Cheng-Yan Xu, 2023. "Neuro-inspired optical sensor array for high-accuracy static image recognition and dynamic trace extraction," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-9, December.
    2. Michael H. Berry & Michael Moldavan & Tavita Garrett & Marc Meadows & Olga Cravetchi & Elizabeth White & Joseph Leffler & Henrique Gersdorff & Kevin M. Wright & Charles N. Allen & Benjamin Sivyer, 2023. "A melanopsin ganglion cell subtype forms a dorsal retinal mosaic projecting to the supraoptic nucleus," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-19, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:424:y:2003:i:6944:d:10.1038_nature01761. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.