IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v420y2002i6911d10.1038_nature01160.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Absolute comparison of simulated and experimental protein-folding dynamics

Author

Listed:
  • Christopher D. Snow

    (Stanford University)

  • Houbi Nguyen

    (University of Illinois)

  • Vijay S. Pande

    (Stanford University)

  • Martin Gruebele

    (University of Illinois)

Abstract

Protein folding is difficult to simulate with classical molecular dynamics. Secondary structure motifs such as α-helices and β-hairpins can form in 0.1–10 µs (ref. 1), whereas small proteins have been shown to fold completely in tens of microseconds2. The longest folding simulation to date is a single 1-µs simulation of the villin headpiece3; however, such single runs may miss many features of the folding process as it is a heterogeneous reaction involving an ensemble of transition states4,5. Here, we have used a distributed computing implementation to produce tens of thousands of 5–20-ns trajectories (700 µs) to simulate mutants of the designed mini-protein BBA5. The fast relaxation dynamics these predict were compared with the results of laser temperature-jump experiments. Our computational predictions are in excellent agreement with the experimentally determined mean folding times and equilibrium constants. The rapid folding of BBA5 is due to the swift formation of secondary structure. The convergence of experimentally and computationally accessible timescales will allow the comparison of absolute quantities characterizing in vitro and in silico (computed) protein folding6.

Suggested Citation

  • Christopher D. Snow & Houbi Nguyen & Vijay S. Pande & Martin Gruebele, 2002. "Absolute comparison of simulated and experimental protein-folding dynamics," Nature, Nature, vol. 420(6911), pages 102-106, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:420:y:2002:i:6911:d:10.1038_nature01160
    DOI: 10.1038/nature01160
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/nature01160
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/nature01160?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Isabella Daidone & Hannes Neuweiler & Sören Doose & Markus Sauer & Jeremy C Smith, 2010. "Hydrogen-Bond Driven Loop-Closure Kinetics in Unfolded Polypeptide Chains," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(1), pages 1-9, January.
    2. Kalyan S. Chakrabarti & Simon Olsson & Supriya Pratihar & Karin Giller & Kerstin Overkamp & Ko On Lee & Vytautas Gapsys & Kyoung-Seok Ryu & Bert L. Groot & Frank Noé & Stefan Becker & Donghan Lee & Th, 2022. "A litmus test for classifying recognition mechanisms of transiently binding proteins," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    3. John C Faver & Mark L Benson & Xiao He & Benjamin P Roberts & Bing Wang & Michael S Marshall & C David Sherrill & Kenneth M Merz Jr., 2011. "The Energy Computation Paradox and ab initio Protein Folding," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(4), pages 1-8, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:420:y:2002:i:6911:d:10.1038_nature01160. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.