Author
Listed:
- Laura Melissa Guzman
(University of Southern California
Simon Fraser University)
- Elizabeth Elle
(Simon Fraser University)
- Lora A. Morandin
(Pollinator Partnership)
- Neil S. Cobb
(Biodiversity Outreach Network)
- Paige R. Chesshire
(Biodiversity Outreach Network
Northern Arizona University)
- Lindsie M. McCabe
(USDA-ARS Pollinating Insects Research Unit)
- Alice Hughes
(University of Hong Kong)
- Michael Orr
(Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Stuttgart)
- Leithen K. M’Gonigle
(Simon Fraser University)
Abstract
The decline of many wild bee species has major consequences for pollination in natural and agro-ecosystems. One hypothesized cause of the declines is pesticide use; neonicotinoids and pyrethroids in particular have been shown to have pernicious effects in laboratory and field experiments, and have been linked to population declines in a few focal species. We used aggregated museum records, ecological surveys and community science data from across the contiguous United States, including 178,589 unique observations from 1,081 bee species (33% of species with records in the United States) across six families, to model species occupancy from 1995 to 2015 with linked land use data. While there are numerous causes of bee declines, we discovered that the negative effects of pesticides are widespread; the increase in neonicotinoid and pyrethroid use is a major driver of changes in occupancy across hundreds of wild bee species. In some groups, high pesticide use contributes to a 43.3% decrease in the probability that a species occurs at a site. These results suggest that mechanisms that reduce pesticide use (such as integrative pest management) can potentially facilitate pollination conservation.
Suggested Citation
Laura Melissa Guzman & Elizabeth Elle & Lora A. Morandin & Neil S. Cobb & Paige R. Chesshire & Lindsie M. McCabe & Alice Hughes & Michael Orr & Leithen K. M’Gonigle, 2024.
"Impact of pesticide use on wild bee distributions across the United States,"
Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 7(10), pages 1324-1334, October.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:natsus:v:7:y:2024:i:10:d:10.1038_s41893-024-01413-8
DOI: 10.1038/s41893-024-01413-8
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natsus:v:7:y:2024:i:10:d:10.1038_s41893-024-01413-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.